Rear mount a Cyclocomputer?
#1
Rear mount a Cyclocomputer?
Hi all,
First time post here, hope this forum is the right one.
My Question> Can a Cyclocomputer be mounted on the rear for trainer use?
Just getting into riding and a buddy kind of laughed at my vintage Puegoet that i was riding at a "Coffe ride" (almost killed me) and offered his Cinelli to try. So i thought i would put mine on a trainer and was wondering if i can rear mount it.
thanks,
DD
First time post here, hope this forum is the right one.
My Question> Can a Cyclocomputer be mounted on the rear for trainer use?
Just getting into riding and a buddy kind of laughed at my vintage Puegoet that i was riding at a "Coffe ride" (almost killed me) and offered his Cinelli to try. So i thought i would put mine on a trainer and was wondering if i can rear mount it.
thanks,
DD
#3
Long cable as mentioned or wireless that has the range, I use VDO CD3 DS on our tandem rear wheel running 2 computers with no problems the VDO wireless has a 15' range so no problem from any rear wheel.
__________________
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
It may not be fancy but it gets me were I need to go.
https://www.jtgraphics.net/cyclist_bicycles.htm
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Cat Eye's Astrale is a wired cyclometer with a rear wheel pickup and cadence so it is particularly suited for trainer use.
#5
Enjoying the ride
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Bikes: Trek 850, Giant OCR2, Scattante Race, Giant TCR Advanced Pro 1
I've been using the Astrale for several years and it's always been mounted to the rear tire. Back when I first got it I had read somewhere that cyclometers were supposed to be mounted to the rear wheel. I've learned since then that this is not as important as I once thought.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
One low cost possibility is to use a regular "front wheel pickup" cyclometer and mount the handlebar bracket on the top tube a few inches ahead of the saddle. That way, a regular length wire will reach the rear wheel and the pickup switch can be mounted on the chainstay or seatstay.
Yes, you will have to read it sideways and, yes, you will have to look straight down to see it but, on a trainer, so what?
Yes, you will have to read it sideways and, yes, you will have to look straight down to see it but, on a trainer, so what?
#7
Um...just for the record, I spliced in some extra wire, soldered connections with heat shrink over them, to reach the rear wheel for my wife's recumbent. No problems.
__________________
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
This can be done but the splices have to be carefully made and very well sealed against dirt and moisture. The pickup "signal" is very weak and any additional resistance will cause faulty or erratic readings.
#11
Thanks everyone! i'll give it a shot this weekend, I put a wireless on the Cinelli and my buddy gave me another computer that has a long enough wire so i can mount it in the rear.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Caruso
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
If you want cadence, rear pickup cyclometers are more common since the wires are going there anyway. Other than that, you are right, there is no advantage and it makes the wires more vulnerable.
#16
Broom Wagon Fodder
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 64
From: Minnesota
Bikes: Fuji Supreme; Kona Wo; Nashbar road frame custom build; Schwinn Varsity; Nishiki International; Schwinn Premis, Falcon Merckx, American Flyer muscle bike, Motobecane Mulekick
Last winter I mounted a $9.99 Target bike computer on the rear wheel of my trainer-bike. I cut the wire between the pickup and the computer, spliced in a 4 foot section and installed the 'puter on the bars. The hardest part was getting the correct spacing from the chainstay to the spoke-mounted magnet. I put a section of hose over the chainstay and zip-tied my pickup to that. Super easy to do and everything worked just great first time.
#17
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
#18
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 5
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
#20
Old Fogy
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 1
From: Murray, Utah
I have a 1985 Schwinn Sprint on my trainer. No trick at all to mount the pickup for a cheap Schwinn cyclocomputer on the chain stay. Wires were long enough.
Incidentally, if you do have to lengthen the wire, don't worry about signal strenght. It is not some magical, mysterious electronic signal, it is simply an on/off switch on the sensor.
Incidentally, if you do have to lengthen the wire, don't worry about signal strenght. It is not some magical, mysterious electronic signal, it is simply an on/off switch on the sensor.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
I just put a Cateye Astrale on my road bike, mainly because my olde Sigma 500 was showing some anomalies, and partly because it was time to spend some money on cycling
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.
Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.
. The Astrale has the wheel pickup on the rear, the SIgma on the front.Today I rode with both computers. For the most part the speeds were identical, occasionally + or - 1 kph. What I found interesting was that the distance was off by .50 km: 30.36km from the front/Sigma and 29.86km from the rear/Astrale. Both computers are set to values published in their respective manuals for my tire size (same front and rear). I can see where, when turning, particularly when turning tight, the rear wheel would track a shorter distance than the front, but I don't know that it would amount to 0.5km over that distance on this course.
Could it be just a calibration issue? Or maybe it's the way my front wheel spins when I come off the ground at the top of the hills
.Al
Last edited by Al1943; 10-26-07 at 08:48 AM.
#22
Sister Annie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 2
From: Hauraki Plains District, New Zealand
Bikes: Retro Hercules adult tricycle, 1953 Hercules ladies roadster, 1950s Wearwell fixed gear 'Club' pathracer, 1980s Malvern Star 'Super Star', 1980s Healing GTX-105 Arabesque, 1980's Morrison Concorde & etc & etc.......
__________________
OMNIPOTENS aeterne Deus, qui nos secundum imaginem Tuam plasmasti, et omnia bona, vera, pulchra, praesertim in divina persona Unigeniti Filii Tui Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quaerere iussisti, praesta quaesumus ut, per intercessionem Sancti Isidori, Episcopi et Doctoris, in peregrinationibus per interrete factis et manus oculosque ad quae Tibi sunt placita intendamus et omnes quos convenimus cum caritate ac patientia accipiamus. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
OMNIPOTENS aeterne Deus, qui nos secundum imaginem Tuam plasmasti, et omnia bona, vera, pulchra, praesertim in divina persona Unigeniti Filii Tui Domini nostri Iesu Christi, quaerere iussisti, praesta quaesumus ut, per intercessionem Sancti Isidori, Episcopi et Doctoris, in peregrinationibus per interrete factis et manus oculosque ad quae Tibi sunt placita intendamus et omnes quos convenimus cum caritate ac patientia accipiamus. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
#24
Wouldn't that tend to make the rear computer OVER estimate distance, since the rear wheel, being smaller, would have to go round and round more times to cover the same distance? That would be just the opposite of what I observed.
#25
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
I know I am replying late to this thread, but I too have a front mount sensor that i want to mount to the rear wheel so that i can get a speed readout while on my wind trainer. I followed the advice above, but to no avail...splicing the wires did not work. After a few hours a swearing and cursing I went to the local Cyclepath shop for help. Apparently, for some cyclecomputers, there is an invisible coating on the copper wires that must be burned off prior to splicing. If you peel away the protective plastic casing, then hit the wires with a cirgarette lighter you will be able to splice in an extension wire no problemo. They also said that old headphone wire works the best. Hope this helps you and saves you some aggrivation. I wish this solution had been posted somewhere before I wasted a few hours "discovering" it the hard way. To think, I almost went out and spent $100 on a new rear mount speedo...
Cheers.
Cheers.







