flip-flop mismatch
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
flip-flop mismatch
if i have a 16t cog on one side, can i put a 14t freewheel on the other without messing up the chainline or having to make any adjustments?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 187 Times
in
118 Posts
I can't find the source right now but IIRC every tooth difference in the cog/freewheel is a 1/4" difference in the placement of the axle in the dropout.
1 bigger tooth moves the axle up 1/4"
Right?
1 bigger tooth moves the axle up 1/4"
Right?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It won't mess up your chainline at all, but you may not have enough room. Spoonrobot is right, each tooth move 1/4 inch. So if you are making a two tooth differenece your wheel will move 1/2". As long as you have track ends, or horizontal drop outs you will most likely have enough room, but you may need to play around with your chain length.
#8
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
Well, you have to get the chain tension right and the wheel straight whenever you flip the wheel whether you have a 16/16 or 14/16, assuming no chain tugs or similar device is in use, it'll be the same amount of "adjusting things".
If it's close to the backend of the dropouts with the 16T you might have to pull a chain link, but that probably only has to be done once.
If it's close to the backend of the dropouts with the 16T you might have to pull a chain link, but that probably only has to be done once.
#9
Brown Jersey Winner
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Bad Woods.
Posts: 8,797
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
you wont be adjusting anything more than you would be by taking your wheel off and putting it back on, its just a matter of chain tension
Last edited by Mumonkan; 07-10-12 at 01:47 PM. Reason: beat me to it
#10
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
I might add, if you have these in your dropouts then you'll want to remove them:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: central Ohio
Posts: 926
Bikes: Schwinn Madison, Windsor Dover
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
pro in someone's theory
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236
Bikes: FTP
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It isn't much, whatever it is and it certainly shouldn't require a change in the chain unless the wheel is seated right all the way at the back or all the way at the front of the dropout anyway.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 187 Times
in
118 Posts
#15
You gonna eat that?
EDIT: ACK... half that? I gotta read Sheldon's writeup on that.
#17
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Adding or subtracting a link in the chain will move the axle 1/2". Changing either sprocket size by one tooth is the equivalent of moving the axle 1/8" (4 mm).
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 07-10-12 at 04:16 PM.
#18
You gonna eat that?
ON EDIT: Think I figured it out -- one extra tooth increases the circumference of the cog by one half-link. Half of that is on the inside of the chain loop and doesn't contribute to the chain length. The other half contributes equally to the top and bottom of the chain.
#19
Senior Member
While you are pondering it, and imaging things, don't think of circumference at all. Picture the link coming out of the horizontal portion of the chain.
#20
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
One full link is two half-links -- the half-links are 1/2" each.
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not really a bad idea to have two different chainrings. If you prefer riding fixed and 16t is the best for your normal riding area keep that, and if you need less or more for certain hills or routes, go ahead and put that ring on your freewheel side. This is the beauty of a flip flop. It's almost like predestined gearing but still a lot less cumbersome.