On spinning vintage hubs... How smooth is “smooth?”
#26
Full Member
Does anyone else have insights on this? I used to believe that it doesn’t matter very much. But I rebuilt a pair of 600 hubs with Wolber rims. I used a plastic abrasive wheel on the cones to a mirror finish. Reused the balls but I cleaned everything beyond thoroughly. Now I am in shock because I went from being the one who had to pedal in the paceline to coasting and braking not to hit the guy up front. No other changes. Is Sheldon correct?
Sheldon Brown:
“Do not be fooled because your hub may seem to have "just a little" friction. Frictional drag depends on the load on the bearing. When you are holding the wheel and turning the axle by hand, the only load is the weight of the axle set and the viscosity of the lubricant. When you are riding your bike, the load is the weight of you and your machine, and the frictional drag is increased by many times. You can feel the difference.”
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tooltips/hubs.html
Sheldon Brown:
“Do not be fooled because your hub may seem to have "just a little" friction. Frictional drag depends on the load on the bearing. When you are holding the wheel and turning the axle by hand, the only load is the weight of the axle set and the viscosity of the lubricant. When you are riding your bike, the load is the weight of you and your machine, and the frictional drag is increased by many times. You can feel the difference.”
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tooltips/hubs.html
#27
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,648
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 514 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7411 Post(s)
Liked 2,610 Times
in
1,523 Posts
OK so according to Sheldon, I'm wrong. Thanks.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#28
Strong Walker
a bicycle wheel has a diameter of ~650mm and the hub bearing radius is ~12mm. This also is the lever ratio with which your system mass (bike+rider) of a rolling bicycle acts against a maybe not perfectly smooth bearing. You'll need very expensive equipment indeed to measure any differences for this.
#29
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,106
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Does anyone else have insights on this? I used to believe that it doesn’t matter very much. But I rebuilt a pair of 600 hubs with Wolber rims. I used a plastic abrasive wheel on the cones to a mirror finish. Reused the balls but I cleaned everything beyond thoroughly. Now I am in shock because I went from being the one who had to pedal in the paceline to coasting and braking not to hit the guy up front. No other changes. Is Sheldon correct?
Sheldon Brown:
“Do not be fooled because your hub may seem to have "just a little" friction. Frictional drag depends on the load on the bearing. When you are holding the wheel and turning the axle by hand, the only load is the weight of the axle set and the viscosity of the lubricant. When you are riding your bike, the load is the weight of you and your machine, and the frictional drag is increased by many times. You can feel the difference.”
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tooltips/hubs.html
Sheldon Brown:
“Do not be fooled because your hub may seem to have "just a little" friction. Frictional drag depends on the load on the bearing. When you are holding the wheel and turning the axle by hand, the only load is the weight of the axle set and the viscosity of the lubricant. When you are riding your bike, the load is the weight of you and your machine, and the frictional drag is increased by many times. You can feel the difference.”
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tooltips/hubs.html
Here is what I do... see if this rings true for anyone.
1) Adjust the cone till it binds, then back off a smidge.
2) Check the axle for up and down play by rocking it with my hand. Some play is expected and good.
3) Mount the wheel into the bike and tighten the QR skewer
4) Try to rock the rim side to side to see if the extra play in the axle is gone.
5) Adjust, readjust, readjust, swear, repeat.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
Likes For mkeller234:
#30
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,669
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2612 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times
in
948 Posts
Both my old Avocet hubs and new Phil hubs both spin like greased Teflon butter sticks.
I just figured I must not know what “smooth” is.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,217
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
231 Posts
Maybe? I get that the bearing load is greater when they are in use under full weight... but there is not really much you can do about that, is there?
Here is what I do... see if this rings true for anyone.
1) Adjust the cone till it binds, then back off a smidge.
2) Check the axle for up and down play by rocking it with my hand. Some play is expected and good.
3) Mount the wheel into the bike and tighten the QR skewer
4) Try to rock the rim side to side to see if the extra play in the axle is gone.
5) Adjust, readjust, readjust, swear, repeat.
Here is what I do... see if this rings true for anyone.
1) Adjust the cone till it binds, then back off a smidge.
2) Check the axle for up and down play by rocking it with my hand. Some play is expected and good.
3) Mount the wheel into the bike and tighten the QR skewer
4) Try to rock the rim side to side to see if the extra play in the axle is gone.
5) Adjust, readjust, readjust, swear, repeat.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,217
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
231 Posts
a bicycle wheel has a diameter of ~650mm and the hub bearing radius is ~12mm. This also is the lever ratio with which your system mass (bike+rider) of a rolling bicycle acts against a maybe not perfectly smooth bearing. You'll need very expensive equipment indeed to measure any differences for this.
#33
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,222
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
877 Posts
One consideration about bearing surface smoothness is that as the loading increases, the steel surfaces elastically conform to one another, essentially squashing down surface defects (i.e. high spots) toward the level of the low spots.
At the same time, flex in the balls forces them into a slightly oblong shape, which increases the interference contact force between balls in the loaded zone along perhaps one-third of the circumference of the bearing races. Contact here is between surfaces moving in opposite directions, so makes an argument for the use of flexible retainers which can reduce ball-to-cage contact forces and eliminate direct contact between adjacent balls.
I think we tend to view steel bearings as being hard and rigid, but under loading, all materials are elastic.
I think that when someone says that it's "how the bike rolls" that matters, it's not to say you can necessarily feel any difference while riding, but rather that it's the as-installed condition of adjustment that matters, after considering the QR's compression of the axle and the slight bending of the axle which (theoretically at least further shortens the axle and also rocks the bearing cones slightly off-axis, both of which could make the bearing turn tighter).
Often the well-used balls are still smooth and round, but this is hard to confirm quantitatively. Chromium balls tend to be "tougher" than the races they roll in.
Yet I find that using new Gr25 balls does occasionally solve a rough-turning axle even when the old ones still looked perfect.
Puzzling to me is how everybody's cup/cone hubs are shipped out with snug bearing adjustment that becomes VERY tight as the QR lever is applied. This applies to new hubs and the new bikes that they are spec'd on. I am certain that this greatly reduces the working life of the bearing surfaces. It seems unrealistic to expect finely-finished bearing surfaces to break in sufficiently over time so as to offset the shortening of the QR axle.
At the same time, flex in the balls forces them into a slightly oblong shape, which increases the interference contact force between balls in the loaded zone along perhaps one-third of the circumference of the bearing races. Contact here is between surfaces moving in opposite directions, so makes an argument for the use of flexible retainers which can reduce ball-to-cage contact forces and eliminate direct contact between adjacent balls.
I think we tend to view steel bearings as being hard and rigid, but under loading, all materials are elastic.
I think that when someone says that it's "how the bike rolls" that matters, it's not to say you can necessarily feel any difference while riding, but rather that it's the as-installed condition of adjustment that matters, after considering the QR's compression of the axle and the slight bending of the axle which (theoretically at least further shortens the axle and also rocks the bearing cones slightly off-axis, both of which could make the bearing turn tighter).
Often the well-used balls are still smooth and round, but this is hard to confirm quantitatively. Chromium balls tend to be "tougher" than the races they roll in.
Yet I find that using new Gr25 balls does occasionally solve a rough-turning axle even when the old ones still looked perfect.
Puzzling to me is how everybody's cup/cone hubs are shipped out with snug bearing adjustment that becomes VERY tight as the QR lever is applied. This applies to new hubs and the new bikes that they are spec'd on. I am certain that this greatly reduces the working life of the bearing surfaces. It seems unrealistic to expect finely-finished bearing surfaces to break in sufficiently over time so as to offset the shortening of the QR axle.
Last edited by dddd; 08-23-19 at 12:40 PM.
#34
Senior Member
I get that. You spin them on the bike on the stand and they spin and spin til the cows come home. But you hold the wheel and spin it- and you can feel... "grinding."
The smoothest cup and cone hubs I have are the Maillard 700 hubs.
It's a hard call as to which sealed bearing hubs seem the smoothest...
The smoothest cup and cone hubs I have are the Maillard 700 hubs.
It's a hard call as to which sealed bearing hubs seem the smoothest...
As are my Ultegra hubs on the SOMA and the Neuvation hubs on my Ridley.
I could not spin them by hand and tell you which one was smoother. I just know the Phil hubs and the Neuvation hubs will never need cleaned and repacked.
i can’t say that for my Campy or Shimano hubs of any flavor .
#35
mycocyclist
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,262
Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 916 Post(s)
Liked 871 Times
in
473 Posts
Balderdash
The G25 bearing balls I use have a Rockwell hardness in the 60s, while the races in my hubs are hardened into the 70s.
(Replacing the races is not only often not possible, when it is possible it is a pain in the b***s.)
(Replacing the races is not only often not possible, when it is possible it is a pain in the b***s.)
#36
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,648
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 514 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7411 Post(s)
Liked 2,610 Times
in
1,523 Posts
Puzzling to me is how everybody's cup/cone hubs are shipped out with snug bearing adjustment that becomes VERY tight as the QR lever is applied. This applies to new hubs and the new bikes that they are spec'd on. I am certain that this greatly reduces the working life of the bearing surfaces. It seems unrealistic to expect finely-finished bearing surfaces to break in sufficiently over time so as to offset the shortening of the QR axle.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#37
~>~
Puzzling to me is how everybody's cup/cone hubs are shipped out with snug bearing adjustment that becomes VERY tight as the QR lever is applied. This applies to new hubs and the new bikes that they are spec'd on. I am certain that this greatly reduces the working life of the bearing surfaces. It seems unrealistic to expect finely-finished bearing surfaces to break in sufficiently over time so as to offset the shortening of the QR axle.
-Bandera
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
Also as an aside heavy wheels are going to tend to spin for a long time because of the flywheel effect.
Last edited by Kuromori; 08-23-19 at 04:17 PM.
#39
Senior Member
That's a pretty good description. First time I ever saw a Phil hub, it was described as smooth as campy. That was the perspective of the times. Nowadays we're spoiled by all these cheap cartridge sealed hubs.
Never heard that cup and cones were supposed to be smoother. I'd say campy vs Phil when new was a tie AFA buttery smooth. Phil axles don't break though. If you do trash the bearing, you have to send 'em back to Phil. BTW, Phil don't necessarily last forever with no servicing, but they can be rebuilt. The original flavor always got rusty middles, but that was just aesthetics.
Of course the hub friction is basically irrelevant. Practically speaking, people bought campy or phil quality because they lasted a long time. If you bought cheap hubs and rode say 15k or more miles a year, they aren't going to hold up.
Never heard that cup and cones were supposed to be smoother. I'd say campy vs Phil when new was a tie AFA buttery smooth. Phil axles don't break though. If you do trash the bearing, you have to send 'em back to Phil. BTW, Phil don't necessarily last forever with no servicing, but they can be rebuilt. The original flavor always got rusty middles, but that was just aesthetics.
Of course the hub friction is basically irrelevant. Practically speaking, people bought campy or phil quality because they lasted a long time. If you bought cheap hubs and rode say 15k or more miles a year, they aren't going to hold up.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
It's not really smoother, but some people get the impression that cartridge bearings don't spin as easily when comparing cartridge bearings with contact seals to cup and cone without contact seals.
#41
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,222
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
877 Posts
The old truing stands with "cone" locators by now being pretty far off in the rear-view mirror...
The odd thing is how so much effort in terms of material quality, precision, polishing and sealing features is consumed, and then for the component AND bike manufacturers to leave them tight all the way to the customer.
(MANY Atom hubs were damaged during the first few hundred miles, not just because their races were of lower quality. They were left bloody tight as installed on millions of 1980's Schwinns, and that's just for starters. But they usually do ok in the long run if readjusted before much use.)
It's as if the attitude is that the customer only looks at the market-rated quality level of the components and cares not if the bike is assembled properly, i.e. "what they don't know won't hurt them".
I sound naive saying that, right?
I will say that it is impressive how long that an over-tight hub from Shimano can last!
.....And for anyone who has never done the QR axle-tightness test using a pair of thick washers or actual dropouts that aren't connected to a frame, this can/will be a real eye-opener(!!!) (thinking back to the first shop I worked in ca. 1978, the owner showed me this, and also how the Sunshine Gyromaster hubs shipped with the Fujis seemed immune to it).
Last edited by dddd; 08-23-19 at 05:46 PM.
Likes For dddd:
#42
Senior Member
No bike I ever assembled in my LBS days ever came with hubs adjusted. It was assumed that a professional mechanic would adjust them properly in the shop during assembly. It's time consuming. Not worth doing at the factory if it drives up cost. Put the parts together, snug 'em up and ship 'em.
If you bought a set of hubs a la carte, those never came adjusted either. If you can build a set of wheels, you should know how to adjust your own hubs, right?
If you bought a set of hubs a la carte, those never came adjusted either. If you can build a set of wheels, you should know how to adjust your own hubs, right?
Likes For Salamandrine:
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,321
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
889 Posts
I think about the consumer market as a whole, and would agree that most people don't know or even consider things like bearing adjustment, or lubrication. From a manufacturing standpoint, too tight may be better than too loose. Time is money. Wobble or slop is instantly noticeable, but binding may not be when the whole mass of the object is pedaled down the road. Or, maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Likes For BFisher:
#44
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,222
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
877 Posts
But consider that when buying a motorcycle, this would be like having the final drive chain set up too tight, such that the chain severely over-stressed the chain and output shaft bearings every time that the rear suspension moved through it's travel arc.
But with motorcycles leaving a shop, such an oversight is extremely rare. I've seen it, but it is quite rare!
So with bikes often costing as much as motorcycles, and with each carrying comparable warranties, what is it about the bicycle industry that allows bikes out the door with over-tight hub bearings?
Like I said, I find this puzzling, and have for many years.
#45
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,222
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
877 Posts
I think about the consumer market as a whole, and would agree that most people don't know or even consider things like bearing adjustment, or lubrication. From a manufacturing standpoint, too tight may be better than too loose. Time is money. Wobble or slop is instantly noticeable, but binding may not be when the whole mass of the object is pedaled down the road. Or, maybe I'm misunderstanding.
So, unlike my analogy to the motorcycle setup, the bicycle hub maladjustment is more of a passive neglect item rather than an act of maladjustment.
Really then, the issue would seem to be simply a dereliction of duty on the part of the final point of sale, yet the fully-built and ready-to-go wheelsets with cup/cone bearings are sold this way whether at a shop or as an online purchase by the end user. At least the higher-end wheels are adjustable in-situ after installation, and with instructions (if not tools) for such typically included with the wheel package.
#46
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,573
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2451 Post(s)
Liked 4,497 Times
in
2,129 Posts
But consider that when buying a motorcycle, this would be like having the final drive chain set up too tight, such that the chain severely over-stressed the chain and output shaft bearings every time that the rear suspension moved through it's travel arc.
But with motorcycles leaving a shop, such an oversight is extremely rare. I've seen it, but it is quite rare!
So with bikes often costing as much as motorcycles, and with each carrying comparable warranties, what is it about the bicycle industry that allows bikes out the door with over-tight hub bearings?
But with motorcycles leaving a shop, such an oversight is extremely rare. I've seen it, but it is quite rare!
So with bikes often costing as much as motorcycles, and with each carrying comparable warranties, what is it about the bicycle industry that allows bikes out the door with over-tight hub bearings?
This is a guess, but from the consumer's POV, it is much easier to detect a wheel that's a tad wobbly because the automated assembly didn't get the bearing preload right, rather than one that is just a hair too tight. Thing is, the machine - unlike mkeller234 and other human mechanics - is incapable of "readjust, readjust, swear, repeat."
-Kurt
#47
Senior Member
I get what you're saying about the a-la-carte hubset, it comes with an "inspection adjustment" that lets the savvy enthusiast or mechanic get a "read" on the bearing quality, so makes sense that way.
But consider that when buying a motorcycle, this would be like having the final drive chain set up too tight, such that the chain severely over-stressed the chain and output shaft bearings every time that the rear suspension moved through it's travel arc.
But with motorcycles leaving a shop, such an oversight is extremely rare. I've seen it, but it is quite rare!
So with bikes often costing as much as motorcycles, and with each carrying comparable warranties, what is it about the bicycle industry that allows bikes out the door with over-tight hub bearings?
Like I said, I find this puzzling, and have for many years.
But consider that when buying a motorcycle, this would be like having the final drive chain set up too tight, such that the chain severely over-stressed the chain and output shaft bearings every time that the rear suspension moved through it's travel arc.
But with motorcycles leaving a shop, such an oversight is extremely rare. I've seen it, but it is quite rare!
So with bikes often costing as much as motorcycles, and with each carrying comparable warranties, what is it about the bicycle industry that allows bikes out the door with over-tight hub bearings?
Like I said, I find this puzzling, and have for many years.
Nothing on a bike when it is received by the bike shop is set up or adjusted. It isn't just the hubs. They come in a box basically just assembled enough to stay in one piece. It's a frame and some parts bolted to it. The headset and bottom bracket need adjustment. The cranks typically would often get pulled and reinstalled. Brakes had to be hooked up and adjusted. Wheels had to be trued up and get their cones adjusted. Dropouts were checked. Derailleurs set up and adjusted. Cables all pulled and greased. Etc etc.
Clearly the LBS doing the work mattered a great deal. Less scrupulous dealers would skip as many set up procedures as they could get away with.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#48
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,648
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 514 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7411 Post(s)
Liked 2,610 Times
in
1,523 Posts
I've worked in a few shops, and in only one of them were we required to adjust all bearings to the right preload, and I mean headset, BB, and wheel cones. The other shops didn't ask us to do it, and when I brought the practice to some others, after having learned it, the owners told me to stop because I was costing them time and there isn't enough reason to invest it, as problems that they prevent are rare enough. That one shop knew that it would have a few customers who ride a lot, and they'd be unhappy if things went wrong. But let's be honest. Most people don't ride many miles. So the word "duty" is a rigid one used that way. There are pluses and minuses to each approach, and it's less a question of right and wrong. I still prefer to adjust bearings, but I don't own a shop.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#49
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,855
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3619 Post(s)
Liked 3,460 Times
in
1,964 Posts
When Trek first started up back in the 70s, the frames and components would be shipped in separate boxes. Apparently enough dealers preferred getting partially assembled bikes, so by the 80s we were shipping bikes in a single box with most of the components already installed. When I was the assembly line inspector I would pull random bikes off the line and check that bottom brackets and headsets were properly adjusted, but hubs and pedals went out with their bearings as the component manufacturer sent them.
Likes For JohnDThompson: