Helmets Lose Effectiveness?
#26
Senior Member
It is interesting that styrofoam, which is notorious for its ability to resist degradation, when used in a helmet goes bad in a few years😳
Likes For waters60:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,501
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 855 Times
in
442 Posts
2 to 3 years is instituted by bike shops so they can make more money, even the 5 year rule could be the same thing. I replace my helmet when one of three things happens first, assuming no crash; one is, something breaks; two is, the padding gets worn out; and the third reason is, as the foam first starts to disintegrate it will leave tiny particles stuck onto your sweating head, that's what UV damage and or bodily oils will do eventually, and that's how you now you got to that starting point and it's time to buy another helmet. All long that will take depends on the person and the quality of the helmet, my helmets last an average of 10 years, and I buy helmets around the $80 range (on sale), I think between $70 and $100 is the sweat spot money wise for a helmet.
How long a helmet stays effective and comfortable depends on how much it is used, and how it is treated. The scenario below is pretty typical of how my helmets have been used over the last 15 years.
The helmet on the left meets all of your criteria. It is 5 years old and was the same color when new as the helmet on the right. During that time it was used for long bike tours totalling 9558 miles or 9.5 months. A typical day touring is from 5 to 8 hours on the bike, not including stops. That is a lot of sun. It was also used for over 4,000 additional miles of utility, and recreational riding during that 5-year period.
The adjusting mechanism is starting to wear and needs replacing. It is possible to replace it but it is a hassle. The pads are compressed and are coming lose. It has also been treated pretty rough at times, packed in our airline and train luggage, dropped several times, and one crash on an icy patch where I slid along the road on the ice. I could have justified replacing that helmet last year.
I believe the recommendation to replace every 5 years is conservative for a lightly used helmet, but the manufacturers probably err on the conservative side. I think it more for safety, and legal protection rather that greed.
I've had 3 of the same model Giro helmets as the one on the left. They are excellent helmets, but I wanted to go with the MIPS technology this time
Last edited by Doug64; 06-10-20 at 10:43 PM.
Likes For Doug64:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
I'm sorely tempted to start a gofundme, have anyone retiring a 'good' helmet send it to me, and pay for a couple labs to do all the same testing they do on new helmets as a comparison.
I typically replace my helmets every 5-7 years.Mine are stored inside (at the very least in a garage, and it doesn't get that hot or cold here) and not left in the sun. If I drop it or do something that I know might have damage the EPS inside, I will replace it, but I really don't know that a good modern helmet ages out these days.
I'd like to really know, but I'm going out of pocket for it. :/
No sooner did I post this, than I discovered this post.
So there you go.
I typically replace my helmets every 5-7 years.Mine are stored inside (at the very least in a garage, and it doesn't get that hot or cold here) and not left in the sun. If I drop it or do something that I know might have damage the EPS inside, I will replace it, but I really don't know that a good modern helmet ages out these days.
I'd like to really know, but I'm going out of pocket for it. :/
No sooner did I post this, than I discovered this post.
So there you go.
Last edited by Notso_fastLane; 06-01-20 at 12:06 PM.
#30
Banned.
On a semi-related note, there's a video review comparing a budget and hi end Giro. The hi end helmet cost hundreds of dollars. The budget helmet well under $50. Both CPSC certified. The difference in weight was 3 grams. Make of that what you will.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,036
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
I generally go about 6 years before I replace my helmet. You can get a good helmet for $100 to $150. That's a lot, sort of. But, pick up a decent pair of fingerless gloves and you'll spend $30 to $45. So compare 3 pairs of gloves to a helmet and then the price of the helmet looks pretty good.
If you said shorts, I go through those a lot quicker. But then, I can’t wear the same pair of shorts for 3 rides on consecutive days.
#32
Senior Member
If a helmet sits in a box for 10 years, I'd have full confidence its fidelity. A 10-year old helmet, even if never wrecked, has likely been seen its share of bumps and scrapes. My wife, who has ridden with me dozen times or so this year has probably dropped or banged around her helmet about a half-dozen times. I am obsessive with my gear but I know that it sees its share of abuse in luggage, in the back of the vehicle, etc. I'm willing to drop $150 or so every handful of years to protect my head even if I don't need to.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 174 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times
in
99 Posts
Let's look at a different item entirely: Trailer tires.
Have you ever been driving down the Interstate and seen a trailer sitting on the shoulder of the road with one blown out tire? Why are trailers more susceptible to this phenomenon than automobile tires? If you go strictly by the numbers, there are a lot more cars on the road than trailers; you should see cars off to the side with blowouts far more often than trailers. What's the difference?
The difference is that cars tend to wear down their tires long before the rubber has time to age out. Popup campers get used a few times a year at best. The tires are going to age out before their tread is gone. What happens when the tires age out? The sidewalls begin to crack and get brittle. Then one day the owner is heading down the highway at 65 or 70, and pow; they're in a really dangerous situation with a blowout on a thing that only has two tires in the first place.
Ok, now for helmets: Unless you crash, or ride through rain and mud every day, your helmet will look mostly new for years to come. It's like the trailer tire with lots of tread left. But the foam, plastic, and glue are all deteriorating, possibly at different rates, and due to different environmental factors. So over time, that helmet will not behave as it did the day it was purchased. And that could put the rider at greater risk should the worst happen. One document I read asserts that the foam itself deteriorates very, very slowly, but that the resins and glues can be susceptible to environmental factors that even include oils from the rider's body.
This article is excellent: https://off.road.cc/content/feature/...le-helmet-1280
I'm guilty too. I don't love paying $100+ for a new helmet when the old one seems to be working just fine. I don't even like the process of trying to find a new one that I like. Helmets become a bit like gloves, where years of use make us comfortable with the fit. But the truth is it's the right thing to do, to replace based on age. My last helmet I kept for ten years, which was way too long. My current helmet is only a few months old. Let's see if I can force myself to replace it at the 5-year mark.
Have you ever been driving down the Interstate and seen a trailer sitting on the shoulder of the road with one blown out tire? Why are trailers more susceptible to this phenomenon than automobile tires? If you go strictly by the numbers, there are a lot more cars on the road than trailers; you should see cars off to the side with blowouts far more often than trailers. What's the difference?
The difference is that cars tend to wear down their tires long before the rubber has time to age out. Popup campers get used a few times a year at best. The tires are going to age out before their tread is gone. What happens when the tires age out? The sidewalls begin to crack and get brittle. Then one day the owner is heading down the highway at 65 or 70, and pow; they're in a really dangerous situation with a blowout on a thing that only has two tires in the first place.
Ok, now for helmets: Unless you crash, or ride through rain and mud every day, your helmet will look mostly new for years to come. It's like the trailer tire with lots of tread left. But the foam, plastic, and glue are all deteriorating, possibly at different rates, and due to different environmental factors. So over time, that helmet will not behave as it did the day it was purchased. And that could put the rider at greater risk should the worst happen. One document I read asserts that the foam itself deteriorates very, very slowly, but that the resins and glues can be susceptible to environmental factors that even include oils from the rider's body.
This article is excellent: https://off.road.cc/content/feature/...le-helmet-1280
I'm guilty too. I don't love paying $100+ for a new helmet when the old one seems to be working just fine. I don't even like the process of trying to find a new one that I like. Helmets become a bit like gloves, where years of use make us comfortable with the fit. But the truth is it's the right thing to do, to replace based on age. My last helmet I kept for ten years, which was way too long. My current helmet is only a few months old. Let's see if I can force myself to replace it at the 5-year mark.
#34
Senior Member
UV degradation is a non-issue, and will have little effect on a bicycle helmet. The main component of bicycle helmets is simple styrofoam, which, as we know, can endure years of sun on a beach before begins to disintegrate. Most helmets already feature treatments to filter out UV effects, Specialized has done so since the 80's. The main cause of deterioration is chemical degradation, as the solvents and such used in the construction evaporate or break down over time, this is accelerated when exposure to sweat, sunscreen, and such.
I recently bought a new, old-stock Briko Twinnter helmet from 1998 or so, and the materials and structure are in perfect order. I wouldn't worry about wearing it today.
I recently bought a new, old-stock Briko Twinnter helmet from 1998 or so, and the materials and structure are in perfect order. I wouldn't worry about wearing it today.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
To those claiming that UV degradation isn't an issue, can you post some Scientific references please.
UV degradation isn't going to make a helmet fall apart in your hands. Sure, yet lightweight bicycle helmet design is pretty much on the edge of material capabilities from the get go. It won't take all that much degradation before the helmet fails to provide maximum performance is a crash.
Now for the record I'm not saying that you have to change helmets every 2 or 3 years, yet they certainly don't last forever and your risks increase as the helmet ages.
UV degradation isn't going to make a helmet fall apart in your hands. Sure, yet lightweight bicycle helmet design is pretty much on the edge of material capabilities from the get go. It won't take all that much degradation before the helmet fails to provide maximum performance is a crash.
Now for the record I'm not saying that you have to change helmets every 2 or 3 years, yet they certainly don't last forever and your risks increase as the helmet ages.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
To those claiming that UV degradation isn't an issue, can you post some Scientific references please.
UV degradation isn't going to make a helmet fall apart in your hands. Sure, yet lightweight bicycle helmet design is pretty much on the edge of material capabilities from the get go. It won't take all that much degradation before the helmet fails to provide maximum performance is a crash.
Now for the record I'm not saying that you have to change helmets every 2 or 3 years, yet they certainly don't last forever and your risks increase as the helmet ages.
UV degradation isn't going to make a helmet fall apart in your hands. Sure, yet lightweight bicycle helmet design is pretty much on the edge of material capabilities from the get go. It won't take all that much degradation before the helmet fails to provide maximum performance is a crash.
Now for the record I'm not saying that you have to change helmets every 2 or 3 years, yet they certainly don't last forever and your risks increase as the helmet ages.
The studies that I linked in post #10 tested helmets up to 20 years old and found no appreciable degradation.
AFAS cutting edge of material capabilities, the cheapest kid's helmets and the most exotic racing ones all conform to the same safety testing,
Cutting edge of material capabilities:
Likes For woodcraft:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 592
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Club, Suntour ARX; 2013 Lynskey Peloton, mostly 105 with Ultegra rear derailleur, Enve 2.0 fork; 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c, full Deore with TRP dual piston mech disk brakes
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 324 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times
in
71 Posts
I use similar criteria when deciding to replace a helmet, and agree with your thoughts about the price of helmets. The new one on the right was $80, and has MIPS technology.
How long a helmet stays effective and comfortable depends on how much it is used, and how it is treated. The scenario below is pretty typical of how my helmets have been used over the last 15 years.
The helmet on the left meets all of your criteria. It is 5 years old and was the same color when new as the helmet on the right. During that time it was used for long bike tours totalling 9558 miles or 9.5 months. A typical day touring is from 5 to 8 hours on the bike, not including stops. That is a lot of sun. It was also used for over 4,000 additional miles of utility, and recreational riding during that 5-year period.
The adjusting mechanism is starting to wear and needs replacing. It is possible to replace it but it is a hassle. The pads are compressed and are coming lose. It has also been treated pretty rough at times, packed in our airline and train luggage, dropped several times, and one crash on an icy patch where I slid along the road on the ice. I could have justified replacing that helmet last year.
I believe the recommendation to replace every 5 years is conservative for a lightly used helmet, but the manufacturers probably err on the conservative side. I think it more for safety, and legal protection rather that greed.
I've had 3 of the same model Giro helmets as the one on the left. They qre excellent helmets, but I wanted to go with the MIPS technology this time
How long a helmet stays effective and comfortable depends on how much it is used, and how it is treated. The scenario below is pretty typical of how my helmets have been used over the last 15 years.
The helmet on the left meets all of your criteria. It is 5 years old and was the same color when new as the helmet on the right. During that time it was used for long bike tours totalling 9558 miles or 9.5 months. A typical day touring is from 5 to 8 hours on the bike, not including stops. That is a lot of sun. It was also used for over 4,000 additional miles of utility, and recreational riding during that 5-year period.
The adjusting mechanism is starting to wear and needs replacing. It is possible to replace it but it is a hassle. The pads are compressed and are coming lose. It has also been treated pretty rough at times, packed in our airline and train luggage, dropped several times, and one crash on an icy patch where I slid along the road on the ice. I could have justified replacing that helmet last year.
I believe the recommendation to replace every 5 years is conservative for a lightly used helmet, but the manufacturers probably err on the conservative side. I think it more for safety, and legal protection rather that greed.
I've had 3 of the same model Giro helmets as the one on the left. They qre excellent helmets, but I wanted to go with the MIPS technology this time
Likes For jjafterdark:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,911
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1167 Post(s)
Liked 1,278 Times
in
813 Posts
I keep mine until the pads are worn out (and starting to rub my skin raw), or the plastic head strap or mounts break. Oh, except for the helmet where the plastic outer shell blew off the foam innards flying down a long hill. May take three years, make take eight.
The shock absorbing foam itself? I've dissected several after replacing them because of an impact. Never saw any degradation. Of course the new MIPS foam may have better rotting properties (from the point of view of the marketers who want them to be replaced more frequently).
The shock absorbing foam itself? I've dissected several after replacing them because of an impact. Never saw any degradation. Of course the new MIPS foam may have better rotting properties (from the point of view of the marketers who want them to be replaced more frequently).
1. I simply got rid of two of my original helmets after about 5 years that were styrofoam helmets with fabric covers, one a Bell and the other a Performance brand. remember these? They were the first helmets I ever owned (early 90s?) and I had two beause they were cheap and I kept one at my office for rides from there an the other one at home. They were in fine condition,and I believe were adequately protective, but difficult to fit and strap properly.
2. The next one I left outside and the neighbors dog chewed it up. (it was old and ugly so I didn't care)
3. A helmet I bought about 15 years ago, the retention system (plastic parts) broke and couldn't replace them - this was the second time they broke, I was able to replace it the first time. I was also ale to replace the worn padding. Actually I still have this one and have fixed it with strapping tape and keep it as a spare.
4. The new helmet, after just a couple of months, I ran over kit bag with car and broke the helmet that was inside. I replaced it that day with a new one of the same. That was about 10 years ago.
If and when I become convinced that a MIPS helmet is better in a meaningful way, I might get one. Frankly, understanding that helmets are only designed to protect you from a fall on the bike, not a crash from a motor vehicle, I think people put waay to much stock in this stuff. I won't call conspiracy but it's definitely to the financial benefit of bike stores (see the OP) and helmet companies that people think they are not only absolutely essential but need to be replaced for arbitrary reasons. I wear one because it keeps my wife and all the busy bodies in the cycling world happy, it's comfortable, and does provide some protection when I lower the tail gate of my car onto my head after loading up the bike, which is better than none.
Last edited by Camilo; 06-10-20 at 08:28 PM.
Likes For Camilo:
Likes For waters60:
#42
Banned.
And yet you cannot cite a single scientific study proving degradation after 2-3 years, but thanks for putting yourself out of the game.
#43
Banned
An impact crushes the beaded styrofoam, the energy to crush that foam slows down the impact velocity. and is dissipated
the EPS stays crushed, it does nor rebound..
the EPS stays crushed, it does nor rebound..
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Nor did I make that claim. If you were paying attention, you would have noticed that I posted a link to a study that says quite the opposite, so maybe you have me confused with someone else?
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Sometimes the plastic outer shell won't show much, if any damage, and the underlying EPS may be damaged. One could take a chance that there is either 1) enough energy absorption left or 2) you won't hit that same area again, but if a helmet is dropped or takes any significant impact, then I would recommend replacement.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times
in
707 Posts
This is true.
Sometimes the plastic outer shell won't show much, if any damage, and the underlying EPS may be damaged. One could take a chance that there is either 1) enough energy absorption left or 2) you won't hit that same area again, but if a helmet is dropped or takes any significant impact, then I would recommend replacement.
Sometimes the plastic outer shell won't show much, if any damage, and the underlying EPS may be damaged. One could take a chance that there is either 1) enough energy absorption left or 2) you won't hit that same area again, but if a helmet is dropped or takes any significant impact, then I would recommend replacement.
Someone else said it previously. The helmet just protects your noggin if you fall off your bike. It's not magical space technology. Just some foam between head and pavement.
#47
Banned.
#48
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,228
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 2,556 Times
in
1,440 Posts