Fairing/Pannier System
#26
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,728
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11063 Post(s)
Liked 7,629 Times
in
4,253 Posts
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,956
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2387 Post(s)
Liked 2,934 Times
in
1,599 Posts
hotbike As always, your well thought out and advanced designs are not appreciated as they should be.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
One recent technology in this arena (in case you are not already familiar with it), is the pair of wheel fairings by https://nullwinds.com/pages/aerodefender. Your daughter's picture shows upper wheel fairings which are similar, at least in concept.
Two really good points, at least in my opinion:
> They have a design and have published some of their technical work to develop and test the designs - I can learn something from that!
> When I worked to develop similarly new ideas in an automotive corporate environment, I was to show a competitive analysis including at least a personal patent search if not a downtown job done by a consultant. Food for thought.
Two really good points, at least in my opinion:
> They have a design and have published some of their technical work to develop and test the designs - I can learn something from that!
> When I worked to develop similarly new ideas in an automotive corporate environment, I was to show a competitive analysis including at least a personal patent search if not a downtown job done by a consultant. Food for thought.
Fairings cover the upper part of the wheel. The upper part of the wheel is moving twice the velocity of the bike, so it is twice as important. (You realize, no matter how fast you are moving, the contact-patch of your tire, in contact with the ground, at any given moment, is Not moving?).
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
University of Toronto provided this cgi image
I also think bike choice would help. Perhaps a soft ride design would eliminate turbulence from the seat post/stays and make a rear wheel fairing similar to the nullwind possible.
Last edited by Happy Feet; 07-13-21 at 08:21 AM.
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Focusing on the THEORETICAL LIMITS in the lower left of the chart. It really drives home the concept that aerodynamic drag is the only reason bicyclists don’t get speeding tickets...
I’m starting with a new upright design, I realize the corners need to be rounded, but that has to wait for a molded version, and the molded version has to wait for a mass produced frame, or else the fairing won’t fit the frame. Experiments with flat, angled plates show the front fairing needs to be angled no more than 54° to the horizontal, and the rear Tailbox should have an 11° taper.
The chart the IHPVA published in 1983 © Douglas Malewicki
The BUY-CYCLE . Part of the economy.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
This wouldn't even be that hard to make. Apparently the nullwinds link posted earlier has the front wheel fairing, an integrated teardrop shaped seat bag would not be that hard to make/source and that just leaves the front handlebar fairing, of which I know I've seen several plexiglass models.Add tri spoke and disc wheels and there you go.
I also think bike choice would help. Perhaps a soft ride design would eliminate turbulence from the seat post/stays and make a rear wheel fairing similar to the nullwind possible.
I also think bike choice would help. Perhaps a soft ride design would eliminate turbulence from the seat post/stays and make a rear wheel fairing similar to the nullwind possible.
The touring bike would need a large 3rd chainring, but I believe such a touring bike could out-sprint a time-trial bike. It would limit the available pannier space, but I believe it could be done.
The main hinderance to production of a fairing/pannier System setup would be incompatibility issues with different frames, and sizes of frames. Would make a custom bike cost an astronomical fee (but isn’t that the point of a custom bike?)
I see similarities between fairings and the cargo carriers on bike share systems, and it also points to the conclusion that injection molded plastic fairings would be economical if all the bikes were identical.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Newest directional signals test
Likes For RChung:
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I don’t have a wind tunnel.
Im much older now, I’ve had a couple of injuries and a couple of medical conditions.
I can say that the fairings help with headwinds, definitely. But I haven’t been able to obtain an 84t chainring, which would allow the aerodynamic advantage to be demonstrated on flat ground.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
This bike, which was the seventeenth prototype, but is now reworked into the twenty-fourth prototype, is very bulky, to maximize the carrying capacity, and the weather protection for the rider.
I enjoy riding my creations, I have more creature-comforts than most bikers. I see a big difference with the number of lights leading more drivers to pass with more distance.
I could make a faster bicycle, but it would be near fully enclosed, requiring a pit crew to seal the hatch, and it would be only useful for 200 meter sprints.
I rushed this bike out the door as soon as the last signal light was soldered in, and there was a concert in progress when I got to Glen Cove.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
I don't want to dissuade anyone from experimenting, but I'm guessing that the OP's design will probably cause more drag than riding without it. And frankly, I want the wind while riding on hot days as it keeps me cooled off. If there's no wind on me evaporating my sweat then I'm going to overheat really quickly.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I don't want to dissuade anyone from experimenting, but I'm guessing that the OP's design will probably cause more drag than riding without it. And frankly, I want the wind while riding on hot days as it keeps me cooled off. If there's no wind on me evaporating my sweat then I'm going to overheat really quickly.
But you will learn to appreciate the fairing on cold days, I recommend studded tires account of black ice.
These latest designs btw, are based on my touring bike design of 1987. My daughter designed the ladies version/cargo bike in 1991, but it requires an expensive monocoque to be built. It’s going to be expensive to do it over again. I want to have a cheaper alternative available for people who can’t afford the cargo bike, hence the touring bike.
Keep in mind, I’m using Coroplast ©, and it’s going to yield a boxier result than fiberglass or carbon. I can’t settle on a final design account of the variations in bike designs available on the market, this is no one-size-fits-all device.
I may have to have the frames welded in China or Viet Nam. I see a similarity in the design of the CitiBike, which has something on the handlebars, a protective shield and cargo carrier, very similar to a fairing (and the aerodynamics are not of prime importance considering the speed limit in New York is 25MPH).
It is important to have the frame and fairing matching at the design stage, and the templates must fit exactly to ensure successful manufacture.
I want to provide a resource guide and database to other experimenters.
#38
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,854
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3784 Post(s)
Liked 5,774 Times
in
2,913 Posts
These are cool looking and someone has already done the heavy thinking.
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Not sure how you might make a fairing or front basket with those buckets.
I’d like to compare dimensions.
My panniers are one piece, left and right together, and the sides are higher than the rack. The rear pannier/tailbox is easier to mount on the bike account of the rear rack, which is pretty much standard, while the fairing for the handlebars requires custom made hardware...
Mounting hardware for handlebars
Likes For hotbike:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
I do admit to being amused at how these homemade bike attachments have model numbers.
#41
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,854
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3784 Post(s)
Liked 5,774 Times
in
2,913 Posts
I can see that it might be hard to tell one white plastic box from another. I expect the model numbers will be needed when they go into production.
#43
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I’m trying to lay the groundwork for a possible business, and I don’t want a monopoly. I expect and encourage others to make their own version. I do in fact have a competitor- CitiBike.
CitiBike has most of the features, the plastic shield on the handlebars perhaps the most noticeable...
Likes For hotbike:
#44
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,429
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,303 Times
in
650 Posts
320 puts all the weight too far up IMHO, the idea is the get the weight as close to the axle's as possible
#45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
M320 Pannier/Tailbox
The M320 is 21” deep overall, 14” above the rack shelf, 7” below. Heavy items should be placed in the pannier wells.
If the panniers are any deeper, there then needs to be a cutout to prevent heel-strike.
The M320 is tapered, narrower at the rear, and is overall more aerodynamic because it’s in the riders wake.
#46
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,429
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,303 Times
in
650 Posts
M320 Pannier/Tailbox
The M320 is 21” deep overall, 14” above the rack shelf, 7” below. Heavy items should be placed in the pannier wells.
If the panniers are any deeper, there then needs to be a cutout to prevent heel-strike.
The M320 is tapered, narrower at the rear, and is overall more aerodynamic because it’s in the riders wake.
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#48
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You could write a letter to CitiBike, tell them the carrier on the handlebars should be a bag...
#49
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,429
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, Karate Monkey, Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,303 Times
in
650 Posts
So we're going to ignore weight distribution of a rider on a bike, even more so on and upright bike?
I have no real problem with what you're doing but please make honest arguments.
I have no real problem with what you're doing but please make honest arguments.
#50
Senior Member
Thread Starter