Standard triple or swap out for a compact double? Opinions?
#26
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Look KG 381 Jalabert, Trek Fuel ex7, Soma Doublecross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I made the switch to a compact double on one bike last year and love it. It was way cheaper than outfitting with a triple and all that would entail (part of which was lots of money to swap the 9-speed dura ace, which I wasn't about to do). The crank was a 50th birthday present and it's done what I needed, given me an easier time on the long hills, but at the cost of being able to go as fast as possible down. When not climbing or descending, the gearing changes were something to adjust to (real easy to spin out the small ring) but after adapting, I'm happy.
That being said, my daily ride has a triple and while I don't use the small ring all that much, I do use it, particularly in the winter months.
That being said, my daily ride has a triple and while I don't use the small ring all that much, I do use it, particularly in the winter months.
#27
Fat Guy in a Little Coat
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virgina
Posts: 339
Bikes: Clark-Kent Europa Ti Road; Motobecane Fantom Cyclocross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Compact double. Triple's should only be for mountain bikes.
#28
Motorvated
I went with a compact double. but then the biggest hill I encounter in South Florida is an Interstate overpass.
#29
It's ALL base...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,716
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd prefer a compact double, but not if it meant losing the Ultegra quality in favor of the Bontrager junk. If they'd let you upgrade to an Ultegra compact, that would rock it, even if it meant a few dollars more to you.
I don't get the impression that there's alot of significant climbing in Wisconnesota, or wherever you are. If that's true, the compact would be perfect.
I don't get the impression that there's alot of significant climbing in Wisconnesota, or wherever you are. If that's true, the compact would be perfect.
#30
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
I'd prefer a compact double, but not if it meant losing the Ultegra quality in favor of the Bontrager junk. If they'd let you upgrade to an Ultegra compact, that would rock it, even if it meant a few dollars more to you.
I don't get the impression that there's alot of significant climbing in Wisconnesota, or wherever you are. If that's true, the compact would be perfect.
I don't get the impression that there's alot of significant climbing in Wisconnesota, or wherever you are. If that's true, the compact would be perfect.
I would agree that if you do decide to go Compact that you $$-up for a Shimano compact crank. Besides...you know Jerry could use the $$.
EDIT: Just saw this on a re-read...
I don't get the impression that there's alot of significant climbing in Wisconnesota, or wherever you are. If that's true, the compact would be perfect
Many challenge rides in the area which use the term "Hilly" in their name. Many rides where you can clear 12,000ft of climbing....etc.
If Chicago gets the olympics () the plan is to have the road cycling course in the area of Wisconsin I am referring to.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Last edited by Psimet2001; 02-27-09 at 11:32 AM.
#31
moth -----> flame
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,916
Bikes: 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
+1 I got a sweet deal on an Ultegra SL compact on PBK. The shifting is excellent - I was expecting much worse.
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
BF, in a nutshell
#32
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 28
Bikes: Look KG 381 Jalabert, Trek Fuel ex7, Soma Doublecross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Whichever way you go, there will be some differences, though minor. I prefer the compact on my "nice" bike but get full use of the triple on my commuter/touring bike. Maybe the thing to do, as someone having mentioned the brain rewiring, is to keep consistent with your other bikes so you don't have to shift radically differently from one bike to the other. Neither choice will be a mistake though, or one that comes to haunt you. It's just that each choice has different strengths and weaknesses, but nothing so radical that you'll end up wishing you'd gone one way or the other.
#33
Senior Member
The derailler cage needs to move the same amount to shift between rings regardless of double/triple. As such, the detents in the double shifters will be exactly the same as the triple shifters. Ever notice how some Shimano shifters are spec'd for double and triple? Who knows why Shimano went away from this for certain versions.