Tubeless on road bikes??
#151
Junior Member
I have ‘tubeless ready’ carbon wheels and I’ve waffled back and forth on the tube vs tubeless question. For my riding style (a daily 10 mile loop on flat and known roads) I made the decision for tubes. While it’s wise to ‘never say never’, flats are just not a concern for me on these roads. I use TPU tubes so weight-wise, it’s a coin toss. And after spending a good amount of time reading the analyses on bicyclerollingresistance.com I’ve come to the conclusion that the marginal gain in lower rolling resistance for tubeless is just not worth it for me. My bicycle frame will accept a maximum width of 28mm tires, and according to the SRAM and Silca tire pressure calculators, I anticipate no significant gain in ‘comfort’ with tubeless when the tires are inflated to their ‘optimal’ pressure. So for me, it’s tubes. At least for now.
Likes For Biker Pete:
#152
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
I have ‘tubeless ready’ carbon wheels and I’ve waffled back and forth on the tube vs tubeless question. For my riding style (a daily 10 mile loop on flat and known roads) I made the decision for tubes. While it’s wise to ‘never say never’, flats are just not a concern for me on these roads. I use TPU tubes so weight-wise, it’s a coin toss. And after spending a good amount of time reading the analyses on bicyclerollingresistance.com I’ve come to the conclusion that the marginal gain in lower rolling resistance for tubeless is just not worth it for me. My bicycle frame will accept a maximum width of 28mm tires, and according to the SRAM and Silca tire pressure calculators, I anticipate no significant gain in ‘comfort’ with tubeless when the tires are inflated to their ‘optimal’ pressure. So for me, it’s tubes. At least for now.
#153
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,088
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5023 Post(s)
Liked 8,214 Times
in
3,884 Posts
A 5 mile walk in road bike shoes is not something I want to have to do. I would be calling the wife, or Uber.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#154
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,443
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,014 Times
in
1,935 Posts
1 mile in a high crime area on a public thru-way vs 10 miles safe ride to/from a local town park.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#157
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I have ‘tubeless ready’ carbon wheels and I’ve waffled back and forth on the tube vs tubeless question. For my riding style (a daily 10 mile loop on flat and known roads) I made the decision for tubes. While it’s wise to ‘never say never’, flats are just not a concern for me on these roads. I use TPU tubes so weight-wise, it’s a coin toss. And after spending a good amount of time reading the analyses on bicyclerollingresistance.com I’ve come to the conclusion that the marginal gain in lower rolling resistance for tubeless is just not worth it for me. My bicycle frame will accept a maximum width of 28mm tires, and according to the SRAM and Silca tire pressure calculators, I anticipate no significant gain in ‘comfort’ with tubeless when the tires are inflated to their ‘optimal’ pressure. So for me, it’s tubes. At least for now.
Likes For 3speedcliff:
#158
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
Agreed. The dramatic reduction in ride stopping/pausing punctures is the biggest draw. We do also have a lot of potholes around here. Rural roads, nice to ride but terrible surfaces so less than 90psi is risky with tubes.
#159
Junior Member
#161
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,585
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4482 Post(s)
Liked 4,953 Times
in
3,062 Posts
Some will vehemently disagree but I believe the "ability to run lower pressures with tubeless" claim is marketing B.S. First off, the pressures I see recommended are not in what I consider to be pinch flat territory, unless you ride on pot hole riddled roads and make no effort to avoid them or lessen the impact. Secondly, the idea that you can find the magic pressure that results in the occasional bottoming out that would be hard enough to cause a pinch flat but soft enough to not damage the rim is quite a stretch for me. The only exception I can see is the hookless rims that don't have the thinned out hook part of the rim sidewall, but even that's a stretch.
#162
Newbie
My vote is for tubeless. Lower pressure with tubeless has more benefits. Less tire pressure creates less deflection when you hit rougher pavement, significantly smoother ride, better sealing if a puncture occurs (allows the sealant more opportunity to seal instead of squirting out), and tubeless is known to have lower rolling resistance over standard tubes in general. As far as repairs and maintenance, I'd rather have scheduled tubeless maintenance in my garage over a road side repair but in the event of a repair, I keep a Stans Dart and can of GUP air/sealant on hand. 10 seconds to plug a hole and 20 seconds to inflate the tire and wait a minute to make sure it's sealed up. I run a 700x30 at 65-70 PSI depending on road conditions. I used the Silca tire pressure calculator to find my zone https://silca.cc/pages/sppc-form I'm very happy with the results but admittedly, I'm more of sport rider and not a hammerhead and I value longer rides and comfort over straight up speed.
Last edited by Parsival; 02-13-24 at 11:48 PM.
Likes For Parsival:
#163
Newbie
I had a puncture today in my tubeless tire, you can see the sealant kind of working around the nail. I was only 5 miles from home so I left the nail in and added some air. Once I got back to my garage I pulled the nail out and Stan's sealant puked everywhere. The sidewall would not have sealed without a plug or bacon strip, while the center tread was a non issue. I used my Topeak Micro pump to add air, I was surprised how well that little sucker worked.
Last edited by Parsival; 02-18-24 at 12:32 PM.
Likes For Parsival:
#164
Junior Member
Are tire liners an option for you? I know a lot of roadies frown upon them but I have only had one flat using them for like 10 years. And it was a nail, nothing would have stopped that.
just put some rhino dillos on my new Roubaix as well.
just put some rhino dillos on my new Roubaix as well.
Likes For cweb99:
#165
Newbie
I have used Mr. Tuffy a long time ago in my BMX bike, but I'm not aware of any tire liners that work with tubeless setups.
#166
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
Likes For choddo:
#167
Senior Member
I haven't read any of the previous posts, but has it already been pointed out that you can add sealant to a traditional bike tube? As in the good ones with the removable valve cores?
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
#168
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,585
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4482 Post(s)
Liked 4,953 Times
in
3,062 Posts
I haven't read any of the previous posts, but has it already been pointed out that you can add sealant to a traditional bike tube? As in the good ones with the removable valve cores?
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
Likes For PeteHski:
#169
Newbie
Dave Mayer Tubeless isn't for everyone. If you don't like it don't use it, I don't think anyone here is going to get their feelings hurt over it. I still use tubes in bikes I don't ride very often and in that use case scenario, it's maintenance free until you get a flat. But the photo of the nail I got yesterday would have definitely been unrideable with a tube and sealant, Slime tube, or any other tubed configuration. I was able to make it home without a roadside repair and I was probably down to 25-30 psi when I got home- you can't do that on a tubed tire.
Likes For Parsival:
#170
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
I haven't read any of the previous posts, but has it already been pointed out that you can add sealant to a traditional bike tube? As in the good ones with the removable valve cores?
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
If the so-called benefit of tubeless is flat reduction, you can achieve the same thing in a traditional setup with 20cc of Stan's, without having to carry a gas-powered air compressor on your backpack for reinflating the tubeless tire....
Likes For choddo:
#171
Senior Member
I've had more objects embedded in my tires over the decades than probably everyone here combined. Including nails going straight up through the tire and the rim, and through the tire from the side. Plus innumerable glass shards and staples and I once received a flat from what appeared to be a toenail. I ride long distances almost daily over gravel and get maybe one flat every 3 months.
A small amount of Stan's or Orange Seal injected into a tube will have the same flat prevention as tubeless.
I can see the usefulness of tubeless in MTB applications for the avoidance of pinch flats, but not for road bike use. On the road, you are riding with enough pressure so that unless you are aiming for potholes and curbs, you should not be getting a lot of pinch flats.
A small amount of Stan's or Orange Seal injected into a tube will have the same flat prevention as tubeless.
I can see the usefulness of tubeless in MTB applications for the avoidance of pinch flats, but not for road bike use. On the road, you are riding with enough pressure so that unless you are aiming for potholes and curbs, you should not be getting a lot of pinch flats.
#172
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
I've had more objects embedded in my tires over the decades than probably everyone here combined. Including nails going straight up through the tire and the rim, and through the tire from the side. Plus innumerable glass shards and staples and I once received a flat from what appeared to be a toenail. I ride long distances almost daily over gravel and get maybe one flat every 3 months.
A small amount of Stan's or Orange Seal injected into a tube will have the same flat prevention as tubeless.
I can see the usefulness of tubeless in MTB applications for the avoidance of pinch flats, but not for road bike use. On the road, you are riding with enough pressure so that unless you are aiming for potholes and curbs, you should not be getting a lot of pinch flats.
A small amount of Stan's or Orange Seal injected into a tube will have the same flat prevention as tubeless.
I can see the usefulness of tubeless in MTB applications for the avoidance of pinch flats, but not for road bike use. On the road, you are riding with enough pressure so that unless you are aiming for potholes and curbs, you should not be getting a lot of pinch flats.
Last edited by choddo; 02-19-24 at 12:18 PM.
Likes For choddo:
#173
Senior Member
The more efficient solution to small puncture flats is to use tires that have more flat resistance. Such as via. tread thickness and armor layers. Using irresponsibly lightweight tires and then depending on some messy slime to (temporarily) plug up holes is a suboptimal solution. Plus with the more robust normal clincher tires you don't have to deal with the mess, the special (expensive) tires with stiff (less compliant) sidewalls and the difficulty getting the beads to to seal etc.
Hey, I had tubeless on a recent gen Ultegra wheelset. Tires were impossible to install and remove without our shop-grade metal tire levers. Needed an air compressor to get any tires to seat. I tried, but it just wasn't worth the hassle.
Besides, if I need lightweight performance road gear, I'd be on tubulars. Strong, no pinch flats, and with 20cc of sealant injected, pretty much impenetrable to flats. Plus you save at least 100g per wheel, mainly in the rim.
Hey, I had tubeless on a recent gen Ultegra wheelset. Tires were impossible to install and remove without our shop-grade metal tire levers. Needed an air compressor to get any tires to seat. I tried, but it just wasn't worth the hassle.
Besides, if I need lightweight performance road gear, I'd be on tubulars. Strong, no pinch flats, and with 20cc of sealant injected, pretty much impenetrable to flats. Plus you save at least 100g per wheel, mainly in the rim.
#174
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,585
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4482 Post(s)
Liked 4,953 Times
in
3,062 Posts
The more efficient solution to small puncture flats is to use tires that have more flat resistance. Such as via. tread thickness and armor layers. Using irresponsibly lightweight tires and then depending on some messy slime to (temporarily) plug up holes is a suboptimal solution. Plus with the more robust normal clincher tires you don't have to deal with the mess, the special (expensive) tires with stiff (less compliant) sidewalls and the difficulty getting the beads to to seal etc.
Hey, I had tubeless on a recent gen Ultegra wheelset. Tires were impossible to install and remove without our shop-grade metal tire levers. Needed an air compressor to get any tires to seat. I tried, but it just wasn't worth the hassle.
Besides, if I need lightweight performance road gear, I'd be on tubulars. Strong, no pinch flats, and with 20cc of sealant injected, pretty much impenetrable to flats. Plus you save at least 100g per wheel, mainly in the rim.
Hey, I had tubeless on a recent gen Ultegra wheelset. Tires were impossible to install and remove without our shop-grade metal tire levers. Needed an air compressor to get any tires to seat. I tried, but it just wasn't worth the hassle.
Besides, if I need lightweight performance road gear, I'd be on tubulars. Strong, no pinch flats, and with 20cc of sealant injected, pretty much impenetrable to flats. Plus you save at least 100g per wheel, mainly in the rim.
#175
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 455 Times
in
339 Posts
OK so now your criticism seems more reasonable. I also had a set of tubeless at the start that were near impossible to fit and it almost put me off for life. They were GP5000TLs. Since then I have used 3 types of high quality tubeless on 3 different wheelsets (IRCs and GP5000TR) and they are pretty easy to fit and I did two tyre swaps including new sealant in less than 10 minutes last week. I've never used a compressor in my life. I don't even use CO2 canisters.