Aluminium vs carbon frame - is carbon always better?
#27
Junior Member
The aluminum frame probably has better component. In the entry-level carbon, a lot of corners were cut to make it affordable. I would only go with carbon if i plan on upgrading the parts over time.
#28
Full Member
There is a reason why all professional cyclists use carbon bikes and why a lot of MTB riders has transitioned to carbon ones. Everyone brings up good points but I will just add that carbon simply isn't as impact resistant as metal frames and detecting cracks or delamination 100% is nearly impossible unless it's x-rayed which is really impractical or ultrasonic testing is done by a trained professional which isn't cheap or readily available.
If the thought of catastrophic carbon failure or the high cost of replacement/repair bugs you than yeah look to aluminum which is similar-ish on weight to carbon but has better impact resistance but can also fatigue. Steel can be just as light as carbon but then is insanely expensive and then rigidity comes into play. Titanium seems like the wonder bike especially for MTB but the biggest concern in my book is cost since a frame a lone can easily cost $2K-$3K.
If the thought of catastrophic carbon failure or the high cost of replacement/repair bugs you than yeah look to aluminum which is similar-ish on weight to carbon but has better impact resistance but can also fatigue. Steel can be just as light as carbon but then is insanely expensive and then rigidity comes into play. Titanium seems like the wonder bike especially for MTB but the biggest concern in my book is cost since a frame a lone can easily cost $2K-$3K.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,904
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3259 Post(s)
Liked 2,099 Times
in
1,189 Posts
There is a reason why all professional cyclists use carbon bikes and why a lot of MTB riders has transitioned to carbon ones. Everyone brings up good points but I will just add that carbon simply isn't as impact resistant as metal frames and detecting cracks or delamination 100% is nearly impossible unless it's x-rayed which is really impractical or ultrasonic testing is done by a trained professional which isn't cheap or readily available.
If the thought of catastrophic carbon failure or the high cost of replacement/repair bugs you than yeah look to aluminum which is similar-ish on weight to carbon but has better impact resistance but can also fatigue. Steel can be just as light as carbon but then is insanely expensive and then rigidity comes into play. Titanium seems like the wonder bike especially for MTB but the biggest concern in my book is cost since a frame a lone can easily cost $2K-$3K.
If the thought of catastrophic carbon failure or the high cost of replacement/repair bugs you than yeah look to aluminum which is similar-ish on weight to carbon but has better impact resistance but can also fatigue. Steel can be just as light as carbon but then is insanely expensive and then rigidity comes into play. Titanium seems like the wonder bike especially for MTB but the biggest concern in my book is cost since a frame a lone can easily cost $2K-$3K.
Its much easier though, to design in ride quality with carbon. Harder and more expensive with metal bikes, with titanium being the most expensive.