Titanium Longevity
#26
Senior Member
I am sure they could. I could. It is anecdotal. Just like every other post on this bike forum is an opinion, from saddle preferences to tire choices.
This is not statiticianforums.com.
This is not statiticianforums.com.
Last edited by rgconner; 06-27-18 at 10:48 AM.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
You are much more likely to see your BB tube come loose in a Trek OCLV or your aluminum dropouts galvanically corrode in a Colnago than get a bad weld in a quality Ti frame. The failure rate is low.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
The material isn't temperamental, and the failure rate from the occasional bad weld is quite low. Do you think Litespeed or the Lynskeys would be around 31 years later if they were building that many warranty replacement frames?
You are much more likely to see your BB tube come loose in a Trek OCLV or your aluminum dropouts galvanically corrode in a Colnago than get a bad weld in a quality Ti frame. The failure rate is low.
You are much more likely to see your BB tube come loose in a Trek OCLV or your aluminum dropouts galvanically corrode in a Colnago than get a bad weld in a quality Ti frame. The failure rate is low.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
Airplanes are full of welded titanium hydraulic lines. How often do you think those welds fail?
#30
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
For anyone actually interested in some real discussion of the topic, this was a very interesting article from over at ST:
https://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/The_...bate_6881.html
Tom A actually posts here. This was the best article/ column on frame material I've ever read, and the real outcome is "stop fretting about it". This also means "stop telling other people they're doing it wrong".
https://www.slowtwitch.com/Tech/The_...bate_6881.html
Tom A actually posts here. This was the best article/ column on frame material I've ever read, and the real outcome is "stop fretting about it". This also means "stop telling other people they're doing it wrong".
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
Hardly ever. There's 26,000 pounds of titanium in one 747 - how many inflight hydraulic failures with resulting emergency landings do you hear of, despite there being more than 30 million flights a year?
The bike industry is constantly pushing boundaries, and doesn't necessarily do things the way more professional industries do. Merlin was started by guys used to welding steel MTBs at Fat Chance, not aerospace welders bored with hydraulic lines. There was likely an industry learning curve as all those bike people realized that they weren't welding steel anymore.
The bike industry is constantly pushing boundaries, and doesn't necessarily do things the way more professional industries do. Merlin was started by guys used to welding steel MTBs at Fat Chance, not aerospace welders bored with hydraulic lines. There was likely an industry learning curve as all those bike people realized that they weren't welding steel anymore.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 534 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
227 Posts
my current road ride is Ti. I also have steel ride for Touring bike and CF ride for Fat Bike. I used to have CF ride as my road bike/commuter but ended up replacing it for my Titanium ride. Why? Curiosity was the main factor, then the resistance to rust was the next factor. Observation of my CF frame made me slightly nervous. I have a hockey background and when CF hockey sticks replaced wooden sticks I saw CF sticks explode almost every time I was at a hockey game. All it takes is a little ding during scuffles along the boards and next time you wind up for a shot, the extreme flex of the stick and the ding combine in a shattering display of breakage.
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
my current road ride is Ti. I also have steel ride for Touring bike and CF ride for Fat Bike. I used to have CF ride as my road bike/commuter but ended up replacing it for my Titanium ride. Why? Curiosity was the main factor, then the resistance to rust was the next factor. Observation of my CF frame made me slightly nervous. I have a hockey background and when CF hockey sticks replaced wooden sticks I saw CF sticks explode almost every time I was at a hockey game. All it takes is a little ding during scuffles along the boards and next time you wind up for a shot, the extreme flex of the stick and the ding combine in a shattering display of breakage.
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 534 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
227 Posts
hahaha lol - you got me on that one. :-) Truth be told I bought my Ti frame used on Ebay and it came with <gasp> a carbon fiber fork. So there it is now but so far no dings on it as there were on my CF fork on my CF bike.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,955
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4845 Post(s)
Liked 3,972 Times
in
2,580 Posts
...
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
How does it relate to biking? I noticed a few chips on my front fork that were probably from rocks that ricocheted from passing cars and I thought all it would take is some extreme event when the fork is under extreme flex and then perhaps it will too explode just like the hockey stick ...
Edit: I love the ride of steel forks on ti bikes. The Merlin I rode almost 20 years ago had "the ride". I had TiCycles build my custom with a steel fork. Rode it yesterday. After 10 years, still love that ride. My 2nd ti custom and another steel fork.
To me. a steel fork on a ti bike makes sense from a ride standpoint. It is the titanium tubing that makes those bikes come alive. Now all of those tubes are in some variation of beam bending or torsion with both ends supported, at least to a degree. Forks are different. They behave much closer to a pure cantilever. To bring response frequency up to the order of the rest of the tubes, making that fork from a material that is roughly twice the bending modulus (ie twice as stiff) makes sense, at least to my both mind and observation.
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 06-27-18 at 02:27 PM.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612
Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 534 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
227 Posts
If you find someone who makes good TI forks please let me know ... I am also interested to eventually replace my current CF fork on my Salsa Warbird Ti.
I lived through a catastrophic fork failure. (Barely) Now I am rather picky about what forks I will ride. I choose to ride only steel forks with brazed crowns. If you do not push the materials and weight, very forgiving of even rather poor workmanship. I will never run aluminum again anywhere on a fork again. Now if my builder gets his hands on the right tapered tube to make a sweet ti fork, I'm in. These would be his welds and he had been doing them for 30 years.
Ben
Ben
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
#42
Senior Member
The only way I've seen anyone kill a Ti frame is weld failure, which is getting increasingly rare these days.
Ti has a couple of advantages beyond resistance to work hardening and high strength-to-weight ratio:
1. It's really difficult to dent or deform Ti tubing due to the toughness and resilience of the material.
2. It's extremely resistant to oxidation. It will always look new, doesn't need paint and if it's brushed finish you can touch it up with some ScotchPads. Also, it's less prone to seizing BBs and seatpost than other materials.
All frame materials have unique advantages. Steel gets you the majority of Ti's qualities without the cost or availability issues. It's easy to make light and stiff frames out of aluminum and you can hydroform it into cool shapes. Carbon fiber is both lightest and stiffest and allows you to tailor every aspect of the ride. IMO, TI is best if you value ease of maintenance, durability and toughness above other factors.
Ti has a couple of advantages beyond resistance to work hardening and high strength-to-weight ratio:
1. It's really difficult to dent or deform Ti tubing due to the toughness and resilience of the material.
2. It's extremely resistant to oxidation. It will always look new, doesn't need paint and if it's brushed finish you can touch it up with some ScotchPads. Also, it's less prone to seizing BBs and seatpost than other materials.
All frame materials have unique advantages. Steel gets you the majority of Ti's qualities without the cost or availability issues. It's easy to make light and stiff frames out of aluminum and you can hydroform it into cool shapes. Carbon fiber is both lightest and stiffest and allows you to tailor every aspect of the ride. IMO, TI is best if you value ease of maintenance, durability and toughness above other factors.
#43
Senior Member
Ti will last a long time if done the way its supposed to be done.
You need shielding gas on both sides and usually a trailing sled with shielding gas.
Needs to be clean, rods have to be degreased, tubes too. Needs to grab new unused gloves for every job when welding. Hardmetal tools for chamfering (no sandpaper drums etc), stainless/better brushes to not contaminate and so on. All this has been known for at least 50 years. You want to avoid skin fat on the tubes and rods, and avoid oxygen/nitrogen in the material, because then it turns brittle.
The good builders does all of this for steel too. Thats why a good custom steel frame cost just as much (or very close to it) as a ti one. It takes just as long to build it to the same quality.
I think the reason we see complaints about ti durability is because some makers sometimes cut corners to save time. And you cant do that with ti. Then it will only last for maybe a few years or less.
Also some makers do weird "fashion" designs that would have failed even if it was made out of unobtainium. But you can hardly blame the material for this.
Also everything built as light as possible will fail sooner than beefier stuff. Surprise surprise.
Only like 10 years ago most people understood that. Those were race day machines, used for racing only. Race day machines last a season or 2. And then you get a new one.
I have 2 lynskeys and these are from the cheap end of the spectrum for ti. But I bought models with sane construction, tried and proven. Not anything weird dropouts or similar. I kinda doubt they will fail anytime soon.
You need shielding gas on both sides and usually a trailing sled with shielding gas.
Needs to be clean, rods have to be degreased, tubes too. Needs to grab new unused gloves for every job when welding. Hardmetal tools for chamfering (no sandpaper drums etc), stainless/better brushes to not contaminate and so on. All this has been known for at least 50 years. You want to avoid skin fat on the tubes and rods, and avoid oxygen/nitrogen in the material, because then it turns brittle.
The good builders does all of this for steel too. Thats why a good custom steel frame cost just as much (or very close to it) as a ti one. It takes just as long to build it to the same quality.
I think the reason we see complaints about ti durability is because some makers sometimes cut corners to save time. And you cant do that with ti. Then it will only last for maybe a few years or less.
Also some makers do weird "fashion" designs that would have failed even if it was made out of unobtainium. But you can hardly blame the material for this.
Also everything built as light as possible will fail sooner than beefier stuff. Surprise surprise.
Only like 10 years ago most people understood that. Those were race day machines, used for racing only. Race day machines last a season or 2. And then you get a new one.
I have 2 lynskeys and these are from the cheap end of the spectrum for ti. But I bought models with sane construction, tried and proven. Not anything weird dropouts or similar. I kinda doubt they will fail anytime soon.
#44
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,572
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3908 Post(s)
Liked 1,958 Times
in
1,397 Posts
I ride with several 10+ y.o. ti frames which are fine, and one on which a downtube weld failed with bad results. That rider is now back on his even older custom steel bike. Almost all of us now ride carbon, no failures even in crashes.
No, there's pretty much no proof of anything w/r to bike frames, though the above frame testing link is very interesting. That said, the carbon/epoxy matrix used in bike frames has technically by far the greatest fatigue resistance. See: https://calfeedesign.com/tech-papers/...l-white-paper/
Left out of most discussions are wood/epoxy frames, which offer all the fatigue resistance of and stiffness carbon fiber without the fragility. Wood is the original composite material. For instance: https://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear...d-bike-review/ There are trees swaying in the forest which are thousands of years old.
No, there's pretty much no proof of anything w/r to bike frames, though the above frame testing link is very interesting. That said, the carbon/epoxy matrix used in bike frames has technically by far the greatest fatigue resistance. See: https://calfeedesign.com/tech-papers/...l-white-paper/
Left out of most discussions are wood/epoxy frames, which offer all the fatigue resistance of and stiffness carbon fiber without the fragility. Wood is the original composite material. For instance: https://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear...d-bike-review/ There are trees swaying in the forest which are thousands of years old.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
The only way I've seen anyone kill a Ti frame is weld failure, which is getting increasingly rare these days.
Ti has a couple of advantages beyond resistance to work hardening and high strength-to-weight ratio:
1. It's really difficult to dent or deform Ti tubing due to the toughness and resilience of the material.
2. It's extremely resistant to oxidation. It will always look new, doesn't need paint and if it's brushed finish you can touch it up with some ScotchPads. Also, it's less prone to seizing BBs and seatpost than other materials.
All frame materials have unique advantages. Steel gets you the majority of Ti's qualities without the cost or availability issues. It's easy to make light and stiff frames out of aluminum and you can hydroform it into cool shapes. Carbon fiber is both lightest and stiffest and allows you to tailor every aspect of the ride. IMO, TI is best if you value ease of maintenance, durability and toughness above other factors.
Ti has a couple of advantages beyond resistance to work hardening and high strength-to-weight ratio:
1. It's really difficult to dent or deform Ti tubing due to the toughness and resilience of the material.
2. It's extremely resistant to oxidation. It will always look new, doesn't need paint and if it's brushed finish you can touch it up with some ScotchPads. Also, it's less prone to seizing BBs and seatpost than other materials.
All frame materials have unique advantages. Steel gets you the majority of Ti's qualities without the cost or availability issues. It's easy to make light and stiff frames out of aluminum and you can hydroform it into cool shapes. Carbon fiber is both lightest and stiffest and allows you to tailor every aspect of the ride. IMO, TI is best if you value ease of maintenance, durability and toughness above other factors.
Ultimately, steel is the stiffest bike material by volume, even more so than CF.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
I ride with several 10+ y.o. ti frames which are fine, and one on which a downtube weld failed with bad results. That rider is now back on his even older custom steel bike. Almost all of us now ride carbon, no failures even in crashes.
No, there's pretty much no proof of anything w/r to bike frames, though the above frame testing link is very interesting. That said, the carbon/epoxy matrix used in bike frames has technically by far the greatest fatigue resistance. See: https://calfeedesign.com/tech-papers/...l-white-paper/
Left out of most discussions are wood/epoxy frames, which offer all the fatigue resistance of and stiffness carbon fiber without the fragility. Wood is the original composite material. For instance: https://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear...d-bike-review/ There are trees swaying in the forest which are thousands of years old.
No, there's pretty much no proof of anything w/r to bike frames, though the above frame testing link is very interesting. That said, the carbon/epoxy matrix used in bike frames has technically by far the greatest fatigue resistance. See: https://calfeedesign.com/tech-papers/...l-white-paper/
Left out of most discussions are wood/epoxy frames, which offer all the fatigue resistance of and stiffness carbon fiber without the fragility. Wood is the original composite material. For instance: https://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear...d-bike-review/ There are trees swaying in the forest which are thousands of years old.
#47
Senior Member
I have a 30 year old steel frame, 23 year old Ti frame and a 11 year old carbon frame. All in great working order.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,240
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4516 Post(s)
Liked 1,650 Times
in
1,085 Posts
#50
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,658
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4759 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
1,007 Posts
Left out of most discussions are wood/epoxy frames, which offer all the fatigue resistance of and stiffness carbon fiber without the fragility. Wood is the original composite material. For instance: https://www.bicycling.com/bikes-gear...d-bike-review/ There are trees swaying in the forest which are thousands of years old.