Giant Bikes...why the lack of love??
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I have been reading BF for some time and have noticed that Giant bikes get very little attention. Why is this? The bikes are very well rated (Bicycling magazine reviewed the TCR composite and Defy very well for 2011), offer a good value and have a lifetime warranty.
Is it simply because they lack "bling" and "boutique status"?
Is it simply because they lack "bling" and "boutique status"?
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 693
Bikes: CAAD 10, Cervelo P2 SL, Focus RG-700, Quintana Roo #101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Giant makes very very good bikes, both mountain and road. Considering their carbon expertise, I would be surprised to hear that any of the new bikes is lacking in performance
#30
Lost Again
Giant bikes are hard to get onto and off of.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I've put about 4000 miles on a Giant OCR1 between the 7000 miles of tandem riding this past 2-3 years. The bike offers very good value and is probably an excellent first road bike, but it's stiff and I'm dreading this Saturday's century, the first 100 miles on a single since we took up riding 3 years ago as senior citizens (we've ridden centuries on the tandem). This comfort thing is, of course, very personal and the single doesn't really fit me as well as my tandem.
#32
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
recently purchased Giant Defy advanced its my first road bike love it so far
all bontrager components, added puncture resistant tires after about 6
flats in the first 180 miles of riding.
all bontrager components, added puncture resistant tires after about 6
flats in the first 180 miles of riding.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If the bike is "ugly" or "ho-hum" looks wise, then I'll be damned if I am gonna straddle it to find out how it rides.
Human beings are very visual and tactile animals, thus the looks thing. Think of courtship/dating. You have to like the looks before approach, even if the object of your desire has the manners/goodness of a Mother Teresa.
YMMV.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
So far I love my Defy 1. What caught my eye was the beautiful paint, the tasteful badging, and the smooth welding. I've had guys ask if this is a carbon frame.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
I have been a cyclist for a while. In my view, Giant bikes are good, but like a lot of other manufacturers (US and overseas) I won't name, their bikes just don't push my button. I really think bike design can benefit tremendously from designers that are as talented as Jony Ive, the head industrial design guy at Apple. It does not matter how good a bike is, for me, the "looks" has to push my buttons, then I'll test-ride to see how it rides. In my view, nothing spectacular is happening looks-wise with Giant bikes. And I put T*** and Sp********* in the same boat.
If the bike is "ugly" or "ho-hum" looks wise, then I'll be damned if I am gonna straddle it to find out how it rides.
Human beings are very visual and tactile animals, thus the looks thing. Think of courtship/dating. You have to like the looks before approach, even if the object of your desire has the manners/goodness of a Mother Teresa.
YMMV.
If the bike is "ugly" or "ho-hum" looks wise, then I'll be damned if I am gonna straddle it to find out how it rides.
Human beings are very visual and tactile animals, thus the looks thing. Think of courtship/dating. You have to like the looks before approach, even if the object of your desire has the manners/goodness of a Mother Teresa.
YMMV.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: LOOK 595 & Cannondale CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I personally think the bikes are hideous. They pretty much have the most sloping top tube design in the industry. Their bikes look like bmx bikes with huge wheels. They also have a poor marketing and sales strategy, which is why you never see them around. They don't care though considering they are the manufacturing superpower of the carbon fiber bike industry and make their money one way or another.
#37
Senior Member
Taiwan is not China. China would love to get a hold of Taiwan, as it did Hong Kong. But the Taiwanese are a very proud and industrious bunch of people who defend their island's independence vehemently.
#38
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,870
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12790 Post(s)
Liked 7,698 Times
in
4,087 Posts
I personally think the bikes are hideous. They pretty much have the most sloping top tube design in the industry. Their bikes look like bmx bikes with huge wheels. They also have a poor marketing and sales strategy, which is why you never see them around. They don't care though considering they are the manufacturing superpower of the carbon fiber bike industry and make their money one way or another.
#39
Full Member
#40
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Maybe the UK market is different, but I see plenty of Giant bikes around and my fairly small LBS carries a pretty comprehensive range, from kids bikes through commuters to Defy advanced and TCR advanced. I have a TCR advanced myself. It's a very good bike, better in my view than the Cervelo I test-rode at the same time. Personally I like its looks, but that isn't a defining issue for me.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
#45
Senior Member
Maybe the UK market is different, but I see plenty of Giant bikes around and my fairly small LBS carries a pretty comprehensive range, from kids bikes through commuters to Defy advanced and TCR advanced. I have a TCR advanced myself. It's a very good bike, better in my view than the Cervelo I test-rode at the same time. Personally I like its looks, but that isn't a defining issue for me.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
Giant is a very popular brand across the board here in Australia. I'm not sure, but I think Giant also led the way with compact frame design.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I personally think the bikes are hideous. They pretty much have the most sloping top tube design in the industry. Their bikes look like bmx bikes with huge wheels. They also have a poor marketing and sales strategy, which is why you never see them around. They don't care though considering they are the manufacturing superpower of the carbon fiber bike industry and make their money one way or another.
There are two types of riders. One, the ones I know, understand performance and can ride different bikes and tell what the engineers had in mind. Two, the ones that go strictly for looks because they would not have a clue so they go for a cool looking bike. High performance bikes are generally not for them.
Giant's line, in aluminum is really nice considering they are building a $1,300 bike on the same frame as the mid $600 bike. Trek, for example switches frames. For the price buyer, you are getting a much nicer frame which was redesigned again for 2012. Cannondale does not offer much at that price point, only the CAAD8.
This thread is like being in a bike shop. What's totally hilarious is that a company can be this large and people can say their marketing sucks. Marketing is for people that like bright shiny things and know no better.
BTW...Giant makes every tube, be it carbon or aluminum or cro moly (kids bikes and the entry Cypress hybrid) themselves from scratch. Every metal tube extrusion, every sheet of prepeg. They have total control of everything. If I didn't have a manufacturing relationship, Giant TCR Advanced SL would be my frame of choice.
Last edited by roadwarrior; 10-21-11 at 01:44 PM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
We had one of those last year. Giant released six to shops in the US and since we are the largest dealer in the US we obviously got one. It takes about a month to manufacture that frame. Three stems come with it to assist with fit.
BTW...we sold the one we had without a problem.
Last edited by roadwarrior; 10-21-11 at 04:08 AM.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Maybe the UK market is different, but I see plenty of Giant bikes around and my fairly small LBS carries a pretty comprehensive range, from kids bikes through commuters to Defy advanced and TCR advanced. I have a TCR advanced myself. It's a very good bike, better in my view than the Cervelo I test-rode at the same time. Personally I like its looks, but that isn't a defining issue for me.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
I think the reason they aren't more popular is simple snobbery. Some people would never buy a Ford even if it were conclusively proved that the Ford was a better car than the BMW. What matters to them is the badge, not the mechanicals. And if the badge costs more, that's all to the good because it reinforces their image of themselves. Same applies with bikes, lots of people are more interested in being seen on them than in actually riding them.
Last edited by roadwarrior; 10-21-11 at 04:02 AM.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Giant has positioned itself as the cost leader, which makes them attractive for low volume shops. The problem becomes one of stock. Low volume shops don't get the higher end bikes. They cater to townie and commuter riders. If you want to ride a high end bike, you go to a high volume shop, which will frequently have Trek or Specialized. Some shops will double up with Cannondale and Giant. Why go questing for a high end bike when other models are so readily available?
Sheesh.