View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#3726
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
Oh yeah, something else- manufacturers generally tend not to make claims that their helmets are "safer" (though again, with new technologies such as Wavecell, some have begun to make such claims). Doing so would open them up to litigation. So typically they tell you that all of the helmets sold meet federal standards and therefore are equally safe. However, objective testing (i.e., Virginia Tech) shows that that isn't precisely true.
A problem with this legalistic approach is that if all they will say is "meets federal standards", then there is no motivation for the manufacturers to innovate and improve helmet safety. But again, with MIPS and other newer technologies, this logjam seems to have broken and manufacturers do now strive to improve safety.
Also, I think the existence of independent safety tests has put some pressure on them to improve. The "safest" scores on the Virginia Tech site have diminished in the last few years.
A problem with this legalistic approach is that if all they will say is "meets federal standards", then there is no motivation for the manufacturers to innovate and improve helmet safety. But again, with MIPS and other newer technologies, this logjam seems to have broken and manufacturers do now strive to improve safety.
Also, I think the existence of independent safety tests has put some pressure on them to improve. The "safest" scores on the Virginia Tech site have diminished in the last few years.
The rating list proves the point we were discussing, higher cost is not an indication of better protection, even with incorporation of newer technologies. Giant #10 costs $65 (score 9.13) and Specialized #15 costs $50 (score 9.55) whereas Bontrager XXX Wavecell costs $300 and appears at #68 in the list (score 11.6). One has to wonder if makers of helmets are missing the point of objective tests and focusing more on the design elements for marketing or the testing itself is not fully representative of safety of human head in motion.
#3727
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
The logjam that appears to be broken is the reluctance of some manufacturers to make claims that their "new helmet technology" allegedly makes their helmets ( or the helmets that incorporate the technology that they are licensing/marketing) safer than those helmets without such "newer technology" and therefore justify a higher selling price.
When we analyzed the data based on impact velocity and angular momentum clusters, we found that the bicycle helmets that used rotation damping based technology, namely MIPS, had significantly lower peak rotational acceleration (PRA) and Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold (GAMBIT) as compared to the conventional EPS liner helmets (p < 0.01).
#3728
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
Three cycling helmets with identical construction were included in this study. One helmet with no rotational technology, an established, commercial technology [MIPS] and a novel helmet rotational technology designed and assembled by the authors were tested. ....The results revealed both rotational helmet technologies resulted in lower peak rotational acceleration and brain strain.
#3729
Senior Member
A visit to the ER is going to cost me $3500 before I see a doctor or have an x-ray performed. A $100 bike helmet represents a smart investment in avoiding going to the hospital or becoming brain damaged.
When California enacted a mandatory helmet law there was one group that suffered, the recipients of donor organs. When young men were killed in a motorcycle accident there was usually massive head trauma but their internal organs were intact and good for donating to others.
My concerns over the years was keeping my head cool, and the first Bell helmets were very hot and not healthy to wear, and the forward visibility. Many helmets I have had to trim the forward brim to allow me to see the road ahead while bent over the handlebars. Thankfully the newer helmets are much better designed and do not block my view of the road.
A white helmet (based on motorcycle accident data) is significantly safer than a black one in terms of motorists driving over a bicyclist, but this is seldom mentioned.
When California enacted a mandatory helmet law there was one group that suffered, the recipients of donor organs. When young men were killed in a motorcycle accident there was usually massive head trauma but their internal organs were intact and good for donating to others.
My concerns over the years was keeping my head cool, and the first Bell helmets were very hot and not healthy to wear, and the forward visibility. Many helmets I have had to trim the forward brim to allow me to see the road ahead while bent over the handlebars. Thankfully the newer helmets are much better designed and do not block my view of the road.
A white helmet (based on motorcycle accident data) is significantly safer than a black one in terms of motorists driving over a bicyclist, but this is seldom mentioned.
#3730
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
There is more to it then just that simple
for starters, the type of high speed accidents on motorcycles that cause massive trauma leading to instant or delayed death, are not helped by the presence or absence of helmet. Human body is quite frail and at high speed accidents, helmet only serves as a brain bucket
saving some effort for the cleaning crew. The accidents where life-saving differences are made by the use of helmet are relatively low speed accidents, which are far more numerous in number. And this why effect of helmets on donor organ count. High speed accidents can often do, damage internal organs to the degree that they are not useable.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
Likes For MinnMan:
#3731
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
I dislike blanket generalizations not backed up by research. Motorcycle fatalities are not eliminated by helmet use, but they are diminished.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
etc.
https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-go...ichigan-adults
#3732
Senior Member
I dislike blanket generalizations not backed up by research. Motorcycle fatalities are not eliminated by helmet use, but they are diminished.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
My comment was addressing high speed accidents and I specifically stated that the difference in fatalities comes into play in accidents at lower speed.
By the way, quoting CDC hardly qualifies for research; and lately, they have not even been reliably credible. But then everyone has their likes and dislikes, and that’s what makes life interesting. 😉
Last edited by Alan K; 11-27-23 at 06:02 PM.
#3733
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
And yet, you chose to cite the broadest generalization of all, representing information from all motorcycle accidents and fatalities!
My comment was addressing high speed accidents and I specifically stated that the difference in fatalities comes into play in accidents at lower speed.
By the way, quoting CDC hardly qualifies for research since they do no such thing, and lately, they have not even been reliably credible. But then everyone has their likes and dislikes, and that’s what makes life interesting. 😉
My comment was addressing high speed accidents and I specifically stated that the difference in fatalities comes into play in accidents at lower speed.
By the way, quoting CDC hardly qualifies for research since they do no such thing, and lately, they have not even been reliably credible. But then everyone has their likes and dislikes, and that’s what makes life interesting. 😉
And had you bothered to dig a little, you'd have noticed that the info on the cdc site was simply quoting a study from the NHTSA.
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api...ication/813112
Last edited by MinnMan; 11-27-23 at 06:07 PM.
#3734
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
I dislike blanket generalizations not backed up by research. Motorcycle fatalities are not eliminated by helmet use, but they are diminished.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
People like to make the perfect the enemy of the good. Why this tendency comes out so prominently during disagreements is not clear to me, but it's a general human failing as far as I can tell.
And yet, you chose to cite the broadest generalization of all, representing information from all motorcycle accidents and fatalities!
My comment was addressing high speed accidents and I specifically stated that the difference in fatalities comes into play in accidents at lower speed.
By the way, quoting CDC hardly qualifies for research since they do no such thing, and lately, they have not even been reliably credible. But then everyone has their likes and dislikes, and thats what makes life interesting. 😉
My comment was addressing high speed accidents and I specifically stated that the difference in fatalities comes into play in accidents at lower speed.
By the way, quoting CDC hardly qualifies for research since they do no such thing, and lately, they have not even been reliably credible. But then everyone has their likes and dislikes, and thats what makes life interesting. 😉
The cited CDC report and its methodology is no better at proving anything about the effect of helmet wear or helmet capability at preventing motorcyclists death at any speed.
The CDC methodology of estimating the lives and costs saved estimates, as well as injury details, is derived from the same set of data cited in the NHTSA document. As Alan K points out the CDC did no "research" on the subject, and its report just made a lot of assumptions about potential benefits from helmet wear that cannot be substantiated from the fatality statistics provided by NHSTA or FARS
#3735
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
Well, Alan, you have I-Like-To.... on your side. Apparently, he rejects the entire premise of epidemiology. Lucky you.
#3736
Senior Member
Then again, may be someone changed the definitions - I can barely keep up with made-up terms and reinvented sciency gobbledegook.
Rather than claiming what I reject or accept, without knowing it, please read carefully what I stated originally.
#3737
Senior Member
Not sure from where did you get that!
#3738
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,995
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,546 Times
in
1,052 Posts
The same epidemiologist can use the same analysis method to gaze at the NHSTA data set to determine the prophylactic power of reducing engine size of motorcycles again without knowing anything about percentages of riders who ride bikes with big engines.
More importantly such "analysis" ignores all other variables at play including that riders of big bikes or riders without helmets may ride differently than riders who ride ride small bikes or wear helmets.
#3739
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,955
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4847 Post(s)
Liked 3,980 Times
in
2,584 Posts
Three cycling helmets with identical construction were included in this study. One helmet with no rotational technology, an established, commercial technology [MIPS] and a novel helmet rotational technology designed and assembled by the authors were tested. ....The results revealed both rotational helmet technologies resulted in lower peak rotational acceleration and brain strain.
So, the damage to me. Broken collarbone, ribs. An acre or two of road rash (both sides). Scrape and blood from my glasses being knocked off. The helmet spun a lot and also cut my ear with the strap. But no concussion.
And an aside - I had a TBI 35 years before this when I crashed that famous Lambert fork. Lived only because I was wearing Bell #1. (Well, not #1, but year two of the original Biker.) 5 day coma. And after that, concussions happened easily. I've received concussions from hard body-slam crashes where my head and helmet never hit. To do this last crash, hit that hard and not have a concussion - big, big surprise.
3 weeks later I read about the new MIPS technology being developed in Sweden. Got thinking. That loose strap. Helmet spun 30? degrees, nearly taking my ear off and violently knocking my glasses off. Was that spin why I had no concussion? Something had to be going on for this NFL lineman's abuse brain to come through unscathed.
I was sold on the MIPS technology right then. Bought the first white MIPS helmet I saw, the MTB POC Trabec. 6 years later, the POC closest to that one. New name and a slightly nicer helmet. (Both are built to very high standards and are very comfortable. Yes, MTB weight, not road weight but I don't notice that riding.)
With time, it seems that the MIPS concept works and does often improve outcomes. I don't expect it to save my hide. I didn't expect that original Bell to either but without it, I wouldn't be here. So far, I have not tested either of those POCs. May it stay that way, please.
#3740
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,783
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4422 Post(s)
Liked 3,051 Times
in
1,888 Posts
What does epidemiology has to do with motorcycle, is riding it a disease?
Then again, may be someone changed the definitions - I can barely keep up with made-up terms and reinvented sciency gobbledegook.
Rather than claiming what I reject or accept, without knowing it, please read carefully what I stated originally.
Then again, may be someone changed the definitions - I can barely keep up with made-up terms and reinvented sciency gobbledegook.
Rather than claiming what I reject or accept, without knowing it, please read carefully what I stated originally.
#3741
Senior Member
Epidemiology has its roots in disease, but has been the basis of vehicular safety studies for more than 50 years. If you want any kind of understanding of risk assessment based on objective data, maybe catching up a little wouldn't be a bad idea. Cause otherwise, like The Dude said, then that's just your opinion, man.
I’m beginning to understand the reason for your poor understanding of scientific principles - if you want to understand science, stop paying attention to Dude!
Dude has no concept of cause and effect - he is easily convinced if someone throws a bunch of numbers at him and make it seem sciency. Example:
Ownership of a Lexus LS460 is statistically significantly associated with lower infant mortality.
You and your Dude must think about cause and effect to grasp the reality.
Last edited by Alan K; 11-28-23 at 02:20 PM. Reason: Clarity
#3742
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,714
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1537 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
923 Posts
Old Man Petersen has some things to say about helmets
Thought you all might find this interesting. It's his latest blog, so there will be some scrolling to get to the helmet stuff. I found myself nodding a lot.
#3743
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 189
Bikes: 1995 Trek 990 (configured for road), Hotrodded Dahon folder, Trek 1400 (not ridden any more), Iron Horse 3.0 homebrew e-bike, 1984 Trek 770 (trying to resurrect)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
80 Posts
Thought you all might find this interesting. It's his latest blog, so there will be some scrolling to get to the helmet stuff. I found myself nodding a lot.
My general take on helmets is that they provide useful protection for bike crashes. In particular, they reduce your chances of injury from hitting your head on the ground from a fall. The cost is low. the inconvenience is low. So why not?
A helmet probably kept me out of a hospital and maybe even out of a grave when I went over the handlebars of my bike. Hard to say for sure what the outcome would have otherwise been. But the helmet damage suggests a hospital visit as a minimum. But I don't see how a helmet is likely to help much with the forces involved when a car hits a cyclist. As the blogger points out, they are designed with a 14mph or less collision in mind. So if a car merely knocks you down, then its more likely to help. But if it hits you with substantial force, The helmet will provide little protection.
So I think its generally a good idea to wear a helmet. Even when you aren't riding around cars. But I think the strong and even zealous advocacy I often see oversells the potential benefit. If people looked at actual risks they might be just as concerned about head injuries with other daily activities - like walking (especially after age 65) and driving.
Last edited by Jay Turberville; 12-31-23 at 11:15 AM.
#3744
Happy banana slug
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,714
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1537 Post(s)
Liked 1,538 Times
in
923 Posts
@Jay Turberville, I think Grant's main objection was to using rigid styrofoam instead of something squishier that slows your brain down before stopping it. And I agree, there's not much a foam hat can do against a Ram 1500.
#3745
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,483
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 3,021 Times
in
1,720 Posts
@Jay Turberville, I think Grant's main objection was to using rigid styrofoam instead of something squishier that slows your brain down before stopping it. And I agree, there's not much a foam hat can do against a Ram 1500.
Styrofoam hats, on the other hand, earn approval from the testing agencies because the EPS crushes on impact, thus absorbing energy and lessening the likelihood or severity of concussion.
(By the way: no, an EPS-lined helmet won't protect you from a hit from a speeding car. To argue, as some posters here are prone to do, that such a helmet is therefore useless for a bike rider is like arguing that steel and Kevlar helmets are useless for ground troops because they won't protect against a direct hit from a mortar shell.)
Instead of bloviating about bike helmets from his position of highly opinionated ignorance, Petersen should interview an engineer or two from Bell or Giro or one of the other current helmet manufacturers and learn a little about the subject.
Last edited by Trakhak; 12-31-23 at 05:29 AM.
Likes For Trakhak:
#3746
Happy With My Bikes
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,195
Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 2,324 Times
in
1,123 Posts
(By the way: no, an EPS-lined helmet won't protect you from a hit from a speeding car. To argue, as some posters here are prone to do, that such a helmet is therefore useless for a bike rider is like arguing that steel and Kevlar helmets are useless for ground troops because they won't protect against a direct hit from a mortar shell.)
It makes no sense to not wear a helmet because it can't protect against things beyond its design limits.
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
Likes For Chuck M:
#3747
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 189
Bikes: 1995 Trek 990 (configured for road), Hotrodded Dahon folder, Trek 1400 (not ridden any more), Iron Horse 3.0 homebrew e-bike, 1984 Trek 770 (trying to resurrect)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times
in
80 Posts
@Jay Turberville, I think Grant's main objection was to using rigid styrofoam instead of something squishier that slows your brain down before stopping it. And I agree, there's not much a foam hat can do against a Ram 1500.
The design problem for bicycle helmets is hard. How do you add useful protection in a lightweight design? Well, the fact is that you can't do it very well. There are some basic physics issues involved that are very hard if not impossible to get around. Automobiles manage the forces by having large crush zones and spreading impacts over larger areas of the body. (They also use EPS in their bumpers and other places for energy absorption). A large crush zone on a helmet would be unwieldy. Who would use it? And it is no wonder that football helmets don't use EPS. The helmet needs to withstand repeated impacts. EPS is useful one time. But motorcycle helmets use EPS as the primary material for impact energy absorption. He's simply wrong to assert otherwise. He also seems to think that rock climbing helmets don't use EPS, but they often do. Likewise, EPS is commonly used in horse riding helmets. I could go on.
Last edited by Jay Turberville; 12-31-23 at 11:16 AM.
Likes For Jay Turberville:
#3748
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,710
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1624 Post(s)
Liked 2,661 Times
in
1,250 Posts
#3749
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,483
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2543 Post(s)
Liked 3,021 Times
in
1,720 Posts
#3750
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,710
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1624 Post(s)
Liked 2,661 Times
in
1,250 Posts