28mm tire to replace 23mm
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 44 Times
in
41 Posts
i would not focus on running a larger tire because it says its larger , but take measurements of your rim and internal width , to run a 28 you need at least a 17mm internal , other wise i fell you wont see much benefit , you could also run a 23 on a rim with 20 to 22 mm internal width and get a tire that measures from 26mm to 28 depending on the tire , and you will get the size with less weight penalty , and maybe an aero and cornering boost as well !
#27
Member
Thread Starter
The rims are Fir 2000. I measured the internal width of the rim at 13mm. Again I will go with 25mm tires and see how it does. It now seems likely that 28mm would have had clearance problems on the frame aside from the rim fit question.
Last edited by solman; 05-12-20 at 08:15 AM. Reason: spelling
Likes For solman:
#28
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3744 Post(s)
Liked 5,638 Times
in
2,847 Posts
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,467
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4252 Post(s)
Liked 2,966 Times
in
1,822 Posts
Do you have calipers that you can measure your current clearance?
#30
Member
Thread Starter
I stated in my original post that I have no experience in dealing with tire size swaps This is why I started the thread in the first place.. Initially I measured clearance with a calipers for the brake pad width and can do the 28mm. I did not consider the tire would grow in circumference as well. Please Forgive the ignorance of a novice...
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
#31
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3744 Post(s)
Liked 5,638 Times
in
2,847 Posts
Larger size will be larger in both dimensions but you can't generalize how much. It will depend on the specific tire and rim combo. IME, the fork crown and chainstays are usually where you will have issues with older bikes.
#32
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times
in
1,434 Posts
I stated in my original post that I have no experience in dealing with tire size swaps This is why I started the thread in the first place.. Initially I measured clearance with a calipers for the brake pad width and can do the 28mm. I did not consider the tire would grow in circumference as well. Please Forgive the ignorance of a novice...
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
#33
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,638
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 2,574 Times
in
1,581 Posts
i would not focus on running a larger tire because it says its larger , but take measurements of your rim and internal width , to run a 28 you need at least a 17mm internal , other wise i fell you wont see much benefit , you could also run a 23 on a rim with 20 to 22 mm internal width and get a tire that measures from 26mm to 28 depending on the tire , and you will get the size with less weight penalty , and maybe an aero and cornering boost as well !
I personally have no interest in ever running a tire smaller than 28mm on any bike if clearance allows.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#34
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,199
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 890 Post(s)
Liked 929 Times
in
542 Posts
I stated in my original post that I have no experience in dealing with tire size swaps This is why I started the thread in the first place.. Initially I measured clearance with a calipers for the brake pad width and can do the 28mm. I did not consider the tire would grow in circumference as well. Please Forgive the ignorance of a novice...
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
After reading so many kind responses about tires and brake bridge and fork interference I realize I might have been too optimistic in the first place.
Does a bigger tire grow in height and width in the same numbers?
The tire will get ‘taller’ as the size gets bigger, generally by the same amount it gets wider. How much exactly depends on the make and model of the tire, and the specific rim you’re mounting it on.
Also, if you’re going from a slick ‘racing’ tire, to a commuter/touring tire with a built-up tread, it’ll be taller, as well, even if the nominal size is the same.
I wouldn’t get hung up on the rim width. All it means is that the tire profile will be more ‘lightbulb’ than ‘horseshoe’ As it’s been mentioned, MTBs have run much, much wider tires on the same size rims for a long time.
As far as what fits on your bike, I wouldn’t be surprised if it only takes 25mm. It’s just that that was the fashion for sporty road bikes in the 1990s; skinny tires and tight clearances.
That was the boom era for MTBs and about the time of the rise of the flat-bar hybrid, so road bikes tended to be targeted to the ‘racer’ set.
Likes For Ironfish653:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 727
Bikes: Current: 2016 Bianchi Volpe; 1973 Peugeot UO-8. Past: 1974 Fuji S-10-S with custom black Imron paint by Stinsman Racing of PA.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
142 Posts
My wife has a Bianchi road bike of that era. It came with 23mm tires. I mounted 25s on it and it fits, but is a PITA if you want the brakes to be close to the rim, since the brake caliper QRs do not open enough for the inflated tire to slip right through. As it also has horizontal dropouts it is more difficult removing the rear wheel. I tried the front wheel of my bike with 28s and it will fit between the fork blades, but absolutely will not clear the crown or brake bridge.
#36
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times
in
1,434 Posts
My wife has a Bianchi road bike of that era. It came with 23mm tires. I mounted 25s on it and it fits, but is a PITA if you want the brakes to be close to the rim, since the brake caliper QRs do not open enough for the inflated tire to slip right through. As it also has horizontal dropouts it is more difficult removing the rear wheel. I tried the front wheel of my bike with 28s and it will fit between the fork blades, but absolutely will not clear the crown or brake bridge.
That’s a shame. A frame that could not clear a 28 would be out the door in my stable.
#37
Junior Member
My Fenix currently has Fulcrum Racing 5 wheels and Conti 4000 25mm tires. When it is time for new tires I will stay with Conti but the newer 5000 GP. What are the advantages of 25mm to 28mm? If they make the ride more comfortable then I am all for it.
#38
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,530
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,059 Times
in
633 Posts
Thats a shame. A frame that could not clear a 28 would be out the door in my stable.
Still, I'm keeping it, I don't care if it won't do gravel. There should always be a place in every road bike stable for a no-compromise, smooth-roads-only, steep-angled, "twitchy" (it's not) classic steel race machine.
Likes For Lemond1985:
#39
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times
in
1,434 Posts
My Battaglin has some of the tightest geometry I have ever seen, and there's no way you'd ever be able to fit anything larger than a 23 mm tire in the back, you'd hit the seat tube! It's got vertical dropouts, so there's only one place you can put the rear wheel.
Still, I'm keeping it, I don't care if it won't do gravel. There should always be a place in every road bike stable for a no-compromise, smooth-roads-only, steep-angled, "twitchy" (it's not) classic steel race machine.
Still, I'm keeping it, I don't care if it won't do gravel. There should always be a place in every road bike stable for a no-compromise, smooth-roads-only, steep-angled, "twitchy" (it's not) classic steel race machine.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 727
Bikes: Current: 2016 Bianchi Volpe; 1973 Peugeot UO-8. Past: 1974 Fuji S-10-S with custom black Imron paint by Stinsman Racing of PA.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
142 Posts
I was the one who wanted her to try 25s or 28s, primarily to make it easier to get tires locally when we got back into regular riding or were on the road. The 25s are fine with her, and we do minimal gravel (at least intentionally ). She likes a classic diamond frame drop bar bike and is NOT a fan of the matte paints or black components that are now the fashion. Her comment to bigger tires was if she wanted fatter tires, she would ride the 1973 Peugeot, which she surrendered reluctantly (at my request and offer to buy her a new bike of her choice) to avoid French parts and threading. That frame has the room for 32s (27") and if we went for hook bead 700C rims could probably fit 35s, but why? I have ridden 28s and 1 1/8 tires long before the fatter supple tire benefits became popular, and moved up to Rene Herse (Compass) 28s and now 32s and am curious about their 35s with the Endurance casing.
When the day comes that we can no longer ride, the Peugeot will be wall art in the rec room, along with my early 1960s Telecaster guitar.