Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

No one makes 50/34 replacement chainrings?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

No one makes 50/34 replacement chainrings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-05 | 12:34 PM
  #1  
jrennie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Race to train
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: suffering on the back
No one makes 50/34 replacement chainrings?

I was looking at getting a compact crankset and was just wondering why nobody makes a replacement chainring for standard shimano cranks? any insight?
jrennie is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 12:39 PM
  #2  
zakk's Avatar
106 kg of Pure Power
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Off the front

Bikes: 03 Fuji, 04 Cervelo Dual

130mm v 110mm chain rings
zakk is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 12:40 PM
  #3  
hmai18's Avatar
Cannondale Shill
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: Kingston, ON, CAN.

Bikes: '06 CAAD8, SRAM Rival/Force and fixie of unknown origin

Because the bolt-circle diameter is different. The standard is 130mm and will only let you go down to a ring with a certain number of teeth (38 I think?) whereas compact uses a 110mm BCD and will let you go smaller.
hmai18 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
jrennie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Race to train
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: suffering on the back
I realize the 130 vs 110 size descrepancy but didn't know the 20mm difference is what the limiting factor is, thanks.
jrennie is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
ggg300's Avatar
Burnin' and Lootin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,713
Likes: 0
From: SoCA
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/123238-compact-crank-overload.html read up!
ggg300 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 03:34 PM
  #6  
jrennie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Race to train
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 1
From: suffering on the back
Originally Posted by ggg300
i have read the post on compact cranks, thats what peaked my interest, I was just wondering why you couldn't simply bolt a 50 tooth and a 34 to existing cranks for the same effect and why no companys made any.
jrennie is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 03:45 PM
  #7  
dno
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Burlingame, CA
The 50 tooth could be done, but the 34 tooth is physically impossible to do because of the 130mm BCD, thus the compact crank size of 110m BCD. SO the limiting factor actually is the 20mm difference between the BCD's.
dno is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 03:58 PM
  #8  
meb's Avatar
meb
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 5
From: arlington, VA
Originally Posted by hmai18
Because the bolt-circle diameter is different. The standard is 130mm and will only let you go down to a ring with a certain number of teeth (38 I think?) whereas compact uses a 110mm BCD and will let you go smaller.
Warhawk makes a 37/130 by placing the bolt circle diameter up in the teeth.

It used to be available by order from their site at www. chainrings.com, but it seems to have dropped off.

Since 35 is a multiple of 5, I would think that same approach would work for well for a 35 on a 5 bolt 130 bcd pattern, but nobody else makes anything smaller than 38T in 130 bcd. Maybe the folks at Warhawk already tried it. I work fairly close to them and sometime this year I'm going to custom order something from them, maybe I'll get some insight when I stop in.

If one has a 35T 110 or 94, maybe one could give it a try drilling 5 holes.
If not one could obtain or make a spider to mount a 110 BCD ring on 130 bcd cranks.
meb is offline  
Reply
Old 07-22-05 | 04:20 PM
  #9  
ggg300's Avatar
Burnin' and Lootin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,713
Likes: 0
From: SoCA
Originally Posted by jrennie
i have read the post on compact cranks, thats what peaked my interest, I was just wondering why you couldn't simply bolt a 50 tooth and a 34 to existing cranks for the same effect and why no companys made any.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=123238

3rd paragraph sets out size, not busting your balls or anything here You could put a 50 on and a 38 w/o too much trouble but other than that...it just is not practical (i.e finding it/ordering it/and the price for it) with the standard cranks of today. A compact could go both ways, however. All of this is in that thread or in a link there. enjoy.
ggg300 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.