Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Rear Brake with Fixed?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Rear Brake with Fixed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-15 | 08:34 PM
  #26  
thedapperest's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: Chicago

Bikes: KHS Flite 100 Road Track Fissie Biek

A rear brake is somewhat redundant on a fixed but it sure wouldn't do you any harm.
thedapperest is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:14 AM
  #27  
Ratzinger's Avatar
Buddy
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: Toronto

Bikes: 80s Gardin. Green fixed-gear. POS mountain bike.

I use drop bars. I basically need two brake levers, might as well have two brakes.
Ratzinger is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:20 AM
  #28  
Camplex's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon

Bikes: Vitus 979, 1981 Peugeot Super Competition PXN10E, Peugeot P18T, Crescent Pepita Special 318 Rando, 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, Soma Grand Randonneur V.2

How come someone riding a freewheel needs a rear brake? Can't he make due with just a powerful front?
Camplex is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:24 AM
  #29  
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
Señor Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,070
Likes: 306
Originally Posted by Camplex
How come someone riding a freewheel needs a rear brake? Can't he make due with just a powerful front?
MOst of the time, yes, but bicycles almost always have two brakes. A fixie has legs for a rear brake and should have a front caliper for use on streets; a freewheel SS does not have legs for rear brakes so should have two calipers.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:38 AM
  #30  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

Originally Posted by Camplex
How come someone riding a freewheel needs a rear brake? Can't he make due with just a powerful front?
Under normal conditions, yes, but if the road is slippery then a front brake becomes dangerous and the only safe way to slow down is with a rear brake.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:39 AM
  #31  
prooftheory's Avatar
pro in someone's theory
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 3
From: Las Cruces, NM

Bikes: FTP

Also, end-overs. In a stop-as-fast-as-possible situation, someone with two brakes can release the front slightly if the rear is coming up while continuing to slow down.
prooftheory is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 10:45 AM
  #32  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,159
Likes: 5,282
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

If you ride serious hills, you will find that brake hoods are really nice for climbing. If you are going to put on hoods. it isn't much extra weight, etc. to run cables and a rear caliper. (Especially since hoods are usually sold in sets and include levers. Likewise calipers are usually sold in pairs.)

And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.

Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.

As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 11:23 AM
  #33  
bmwjoe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 37
From: Telford, PA

Bikes: Pinarello FP Due, Cesare track bike modified for the street.

I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.

Memorial to Matthew R. Dille
bmwjoe is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 11:43 AM
  #34  
~>~
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
Originally Posted by Camplex
How come someone riding a freewheel needs a rear brake? Can't he make due with just a powerful front?
Traction limits what a single contact patch will support in braking: loose/broken/wet surfaces can require the use of F&R to avoid a lock-up and maximize control.
For experienced riders the application of front or rear brakes can have different functions other than just short stopping distances.
Setting up for corners, keeping the correct distance in a paceline, covering a brake while reaching for a drink or descending at pace require different modulations.

FW bikes require properly set-up brakes F&R.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 11:55 AM
  #35  
prooftheory's Avatar
pro in someone's theory
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 3
From: Las Cruces, NM

Bikes: FTP

[MENTION=393034]bmwjoe[/MENTION], sorry about your son.
prooftheory is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 11:57 AM
  #36  
himespau's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,765
Likes: 3,937
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by bmwjoe
I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.

Memorial to Matthew R. Dille
That is a very attractive seat lug cluster. You did a hell of a job modifying that bike and made a great choice of one to start with.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 01:25 PM
  #37  
jlafitte's Avatar
Pirate/Smuggler
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 7
From: Marigny/Leucadia
Originally Posted by prooftheory
@bmwjoe, sorry about your son.
Yep and a super thoughtful page documenting his bike and its importance.
jlafitte is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-15 | 01:32 PM
  #38  
Thread Starter
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 14,779
Likes: 743
From: Northwest Georgia

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Originally Posted by bmwjoe
I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.

Memorial to Matthew R. Dille
I appreciate what you did with the bike and as a memorial to your son. My 4 1/2 year old daughter was lost to leukemia in 1996.

I hope you are at peace.


-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Reply
Old 09-11-15 | 12:01 PM
  #39  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the long thought out replies in this thread. I had the same question! You guys are awesome.
chowtownsfinest is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-15 | 09:03 AM
  #40  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
If you ride serious hills, you will find that brake hoods are really nice for climbing. If you are going to put on hoods. it isn't much extra weight, etc. to run cables and a rear caliper. (Especially since hoods are usually sold in sets and include levers. Likewise calipers are usually sold in pairs.)

And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.

Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.

As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.

Ben
As my post earlier says, I like to ride a lot of the canyons here. It is very easy to reach 30+ mph on the descents. Your legs are moving so fast they're useless as your rear brake, you'd probably crash if you tried and scrwed up. Using too much front brake when your legs are spinning fast can cause some scary front end shimmy which is then difficult to recover from because your legs are spinning so fast. For most riding I don't use the read but it is very useful on descents.
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-15 | 08:01 PM
  #41  
jlafitte's Avatar
Pirate/Smuggler
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 7
From: Marigny/Leucadia
Originally Posted by hairnet
Using too much front brake when your legs are spinning fast can cause some scary front end shimmy which is then difficult to recover from because your legs are spinning so fast. For most riding I don't use the read but it is very useful on descents.
Key information.
jlafitte is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-15 | 10:35 PM
  #42  
velofinds's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 8
From: NYC
No less an authority than Sheldon Brown writes:

There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.

If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
velofinds is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-15 | 11:13 PM
  #43  
Dannihilator's Avatar
Still kicking.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Registered
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

I don't run a rear brake, but have a front brake. If you have plans to run it as either, a rear brake can be beneficial. I've instructed people where I live who are starting to ride fixed gears to have a front and rear brake until you get used to the motions and remember to not try to coast and stress that once used to it, it is their own decision to remove the rear brake.
[MENTION=393034]bmwjoe[/MENTION] , sorry about your son. I think it is awesome that you built that bike up in memoriam.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.

Last edited by Dannihilator; 09-14-15 at 11:17 PM.
Dannihilator is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-15 | 06:32 PM
  #44  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: south Florida

Bikes: Dawes, Jamis, Gardin, Can-o-ale

Originally Posted by leegf
No less an authority than Sheldon Brown writes:

There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.

If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
I have yet been able to make my 16 tooth rear cog skid while at speed - but if I did I have a feeling that I would be leaning so far over the front wheel for leverage that the rear would be unweighted too much to even be a brake.
Mambo Dave is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-15 | 08:16 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 516
Likes: 12
^ Hard to tell how hard it is to skid on a 16t rear cog without knowing what you got up front. Lean forward to initiate the skid, then lean back to put pressure over the real wheel. Probably easier, hop the rear wheel and lean back on it
hardboiled718 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-15 | 08:50 PM
  #46  
Clark W. Griswold
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,248
Likes: 6,624
From: ,location, location

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

I prefer having front and rear brakes. I ride in all conditions and don't want to have bum knees and ankles when I am much much older. Plus I suck at skidding unless it is an emergency situation in which case my legs somehow know what to do. At the worst having two brakes is a little extra weight and a lot of extra security.

I also like the symmetry since I run TT levers on my bars and only having one would look silly.
veganbikes is offline  
Reply
Old 09-15-15 | 09:05 PM
  #47  
Nagrom_'s Avatar
Fixie Infamous
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,480
Likes: 28
I use a front brake, but only to make skidding easier.

Rip the brake so your rear wheel loses weight, lock out that skid and look sick.
__________________
Originally Posted by seau grateau
No offense but you're an idiot.
PedalRoom
Nagrom_ is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-15 | 08:13 AM
  #48  
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Where I live I have got to have two brakes due to the hoards of terrible bicycle riders.


I have had my fixed gear for about a month now and am planning to make it a SS because running a noisy freewheel is the only thing that gets attention. My former road bike with a Campagnolo free hub used to clear a path for me when I’d spin it backward.


This bike is for fitness and maybe going to a bar every now and then. So if I am running two brakes anyway, is there a point to keeping it fixed? (fitness wise)
alfmil is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-15 | 08:55 AM
  #49  
Scrodzilla's Avatar
Your cog is slipping.
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA

Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle

Originally Posted by alfmil
I have had my fixed gear for about a month now and am planning to make it a SS because running a noisy freewheel is the only thing that gets attention. My former road bike with a Campagnolo free hub used to clear a path for me when I’d spin it backward.
Get a bell. All the cool kids have bells on their bikes.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-15 | 08:57 AM
  #50  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
Get a bell. All the cool kids have bells on their bikes.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.