Rear Brake with Fixed?
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Bikes: Vitus 979, 1981 Peugeot Super Competition PXN10E, Peugeot P18T, Crescent Pepita Special 318 Rando, 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney, 1974 Schwinn Le Tour, Soma Grand Randonneur V.2
How come someone riding a freewheel needs a rear brake? Can't he make due with just a powerful front?
#29
MOst of the time, yes, but bicycles almost always have two brakes. A fixie has legs for a rear brake and should have a front caliper for use on streets; a freewheel SS does not have legs for rear brakes so should have two calipers.
#30
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels
Under normal conditions, yes, but if the road is slippery then a front brake becomes dangerous and the only safe way to slow down is with a rear brake.
#32
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,159
Likes: 5,282
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
If you ride serious hills, you will find that brake hoods are really nice for climbing. If you are going to put on hoods. it isn't much extra weight, etc. to run cables and a rear caliper. (Especially since hoods are usually sold in sets and include levers. Likewise calipers are usually sold in pairs.)
And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.
Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.
As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.
Ben
And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.
Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.
As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.
Ben
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 37
From: Telford, PA
Bikes: Pinarello FP Due, Cesare track bike modified for the street.
I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.
Memorial to Matthew R. Dille
Memorial to Matthew R. Dille
#34
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
For experienced riders the application of front or rear brakes can have different functions other than just short stopping distances.
Setting up for corners, keeping the correct distance in a paceline, covering a brake while reaching for a drink or descending at pace require different modulations.
FW bikes require properly set-up brakes F&R.
-Bandera
#36
I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.
Memorial to Matthew R. Dille

Memorial to Matthew R. Dille

__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#38
Thread Starter
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 14,779
Likes: 743
From: Northwest Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
I have ridden with and w/o the rear brake and I find it much better to have the rear brake on the bike. I find the rear brake allows more control when you are slowing during a decent. At the very least, it is nice to have two brake levers for symmetry.
Memorial to Matthew R. Dille

Memorial to Matthew R. Dille

I hope you are at peace.
-Tim-
#40
If you ride serious hills, you will find that brake hoods are really nice for climbing. If you are going to put on hoods. it isn't much extra weight, etc. to run cables and a rear caliper. (Especially since hoods are usually sold in sets and include levers. Likewise calipers are usually sold in pairs.)
And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.
Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.
As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.
Ben
And downhill at high speed, the rear brake is really nice for bleeding off speed and keeping your RPM under control. We can be talking RPMs that the rest of the world will say cannot be done. I've done close to 50 mph (many years ago when I was young, recently post racing, riding my post accident years for my sanity and descending Oakland, CA's Juaquin Miller on a 42-17. That's well over 200 RPM.
Plus, when it comes to real downhills, redundancy in stopping is never a bad thing. And once you hit 40 mph, forget about using your legs! Suppose anything happens to your front brake.
As far as problems of a rear brake on a fix gear? Well they have not shown up for me in my first 94,000 miles. Not saying there aren't any. I'll keep riding fixed and report back when I see them.
Ben
#41
#42
No less an authority than Sheldon Brown writes:
There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.
If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.
If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
#43
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
I don't run a rear brake, but have a front brake. If you have plans to run it as either, a rear brake can be beneficial. I've instructed people where I live who are starting to ride fixed gears to have a front and rear brake until you get used to the motions and remember to not try to coast and stress that once used to it, it is their own decision to remove the rear brake.
[MENTION=393034]bmwjoe[/MENTION] , sorry about your son. I think it is awesome that you built that bike up in memoriam.
[MENTION=393034]bmwjoe[/MENTION] , sorry about your son. I think it is awesome that you built that bike up in memoriam.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Last edited by Dannihilator; 09-14-15 at 11:17 PM.
#44
Member
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: south Florida
Bikes: Dawes, Jamis, Gardin, Can-o-ale
No less an authority than Sheldon Brown writes:
There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.
If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
There is really no need for a rear brake on a fixed-gear bicycle. By applying back-pressure on the pedals, you can supply all the braking that the rear wheel really needs. In fact, it is fairly easy to lock up the rear wheel and make it skid, unless you are running a rather high gear.
If it's good enough for Sheldon, then it's good enough for me.
#45
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 516
Likes: 12
^ Hard to tell how hard it is to skid on a 16t rear cog without knowing what you got up front. Lean forward to initiate the skid, then lean back to put pressure over the real wheel. Probably easier, hop the rear wheel and lean back on it
#46
Clark W. Griswold




Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,248
Likes: 6,624
From: ,location, location
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
I prefer having front and rear brakes. I ride in all conditions and don't want to have bum knees and ankles when I am much much older. Plus I suck at skidding unless it is an emergency situation in which case my legs somehow know what to do. At the worst having two brakes is a little extra weight and a lot of extra security.
I also like the symmetry since I run TT levers on my bars and only having one would look silly.
I also like the symmetry since I run TT levers on my bars and only having one would look silly.
#47
I use a front brake, but only to make skidding easier.
Rip the brake so your rear wheel loses weight, lock out that skid and look sick.
Rip the brake so your rear wheel loses weight, lock out that skid and look sick.
#48
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Where I live I have got to have two brakes due to the hoards of terrible bicycle riders.
I have had my fixed gear for about a month now and am planning to make it a SS because running a noisy freewheel is the only thing that gets attention. My former road bike with a Campagnolo free hub used to clear a path for me when I’d spin it backward.
This bike is for fitness and maybe going to a bar every now and then. So if I am running two brakes anyway, is there a point to keeping it fixed? (fitness wise)
I have had my fixed gear for about a month now and am planning to make it a SS because running a noisy freewheel is the only thing that gets attention. My former road bike with a Campagnolo free hub used to clear a path for me when I’d spin it backward.
This bike is for fitness and maybe going to a bar every now and then. So if I am running two brakes anyway, is there a point to keeping it fixed? (fitness wise)
#49
Your cog is slipping.



Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA
Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle
Get a bell. All the cool kids have bells on their bikes.
#50
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels



