Go to Lower Gear?
#1
Standard Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 3,635
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1058 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
255 Posts
Go to Lower Gear?
I just started riding single-speed, and still have my 4-speed Atom freewheel on my C&V. I am using the 14T cog in conjunction with the 40T inner chainring (I took the 46T off). I want to select a proper single-speed freewheel.
What I was unaware of, was that most (all?) single-speed riders ride with both a lower-geared freewheel and a higher-geared chainring.
I know that switching to a single-speed freewheel will reduce weight, which is good.
I've read the single-speed advice article over at Surly, and have taken note of the important factors in efficiency; chain line, chain tension, chain selection and lubrication etc, but have yet to have-explained why a relatively high-geared freewheel, in combination with a lower-geared chainring, such as mine, is undesirable.
I love the gearing of my bike as it is, and don't want to change it at all.
Do freewheel gears larger than what I am using now translate into easier pedaling and/or less wear and tear on the drivetrain?
I found a high-quality freewheel (White Industries Eno) that is 16T, and if I use that and put the 46T back on the crank and take the 40T off, is that inherently better? How would 46/16 feel as compared to 40/14?
What I was unaware of, was that most (all?) single-speed riders ride with both a lower-geared freewheel and a higher-geared chainring.
I know that switching to a single-speed freewheel will reduce weight, which is good.
I've read the single-speed advice article over at Surly, and have taken note of the important factors in efficiency; chain line, chain tension, chain selection and lubrication etc, but have yet to have-explained why a relatively high-geared freewheel, in combination with a lower-geared chainring, such as mine, is undesirable.
I love the gearing of my bike as it is, and don't want to change it at all.
Do freewheel gears larger than what I am using now translate into easier pedaling and/or less wear and tear on the drivetrain?
I found a high-quality freewheel (White Industries Eno) that is 16T, and if I use that and put the 46T back on the crank and take the 40T off, is that inherently better? How would 46/16 feel as compared to 40/14?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,859
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2950 Post(s)
Liked 3,090 Times
in
1,409 Posts
40x14 and 46x16 are identical (75-ish gear inches, depending on tire size), so your legs won't feel a difference. However, 40x14 will wear faster than 46x16 because there are 8 fewer teeth to spread the load. On the other hand, depending on your frame, you might have an issue with a 46t chainring clearing the chainstays.
#3
Standard Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 3,635
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1058 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
255 Posts
Thanks, cal. That's good news about the gear/inches. The bolts on the chainwheel will clear the chainstay if I leave them where they are, but I'll have to put spacers behind the s.s. freewheel to push it outboard and give me a straight chain line. I use 700 x 28 tires.
I should note that the teeth on both my freewheel and crank are steel.
I should note that the teeth on both my freewheel and crank are steel.
Last edited by 1989Pre; 11-09-16 at 07:48 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The most congested city in the world.
Posts: 95
Bikes: Celt Steel Frame
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Go with the big gear inches man, to feel that tension in your legs, its a good workout

#5
Senior Member
Thanks, cal. That's good news about the gear/inches. The bolts on the chainwheel will clear the chainstay if I leave them where they are, but I'll have to put spacers behind the s.s. freewheel to push it outboard and give me a straight chain line. I use 700 x 28 tires.
I should note that the teeth on both my freewheel and crank are steel.
I should note that the teeth on both my freewheel and crank are steel.
As long as its straight, not too tight, not too loose, keep clean every after ride, well lube and change chain every approximate 3000km
Your drivetrain will be in good shape for a long long long time til you (probably) decided to change or buy a new bike

#6
Standard Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 3,635
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1058 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
255 Posts
Thanks, Alt. I'll follow your advice. I noticed that on the afore-mentioned article at Surly, they indicated that "too tight" meant being able to feel any resistance when you back-pedal. I had to pull my rear wheel a bit forward, this morning, and now it is much better.