Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Fixed gear chain life

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Fixed gear chain life

Old 11-13-17, 03:58 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,646

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5755 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
Originally Posted by Scott Bontz
FB, I can move the upper run of chain up and down about 1/2 inch, more than the 1/4 inch sag you mention. But maybe you mean simply hangs down by its own weight 1/4 inch. But I think that would translate into going up and down a total of 1/2 inch. I'll put a yardstick across the sprockets and see how far the chain actually sags without me pushing it. And though DiabloScott appears with me on avoiding too much slack and slop, I'll try living with a little more of it and see what happens.
The guideline is 1/4" sag, or 1/2" total up and down (1/4" in each direction). But you can go tighter than that if you want to reduce the backlash. Slack is slack so as long as there's some slack at the tightest place, found by rotating the cranks a number of times.

Note, that both the front and rear sprockets may be eccentric, so you need to go a few times to ensure that you've confirmed slack at the tightest place which will be when both high spots are opposite each other.

My track bike has very round, non-eccentric sprockets, so I've minimized the backlash by having only about 1/16" sag at the tightest place, but every drive train is different so be cautious as you try to minimize the slack.

You can also use your ears to check if the bike is in a stand. If you don't have enough slack and the chain goes taut at any point, the sound will change and you'll both hear and feel the vibration change.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 11-13-17 at 04:07 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 05:45 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Gypsum, Kansas
Posts: 9

Bikes: Surly Steamroller with fixed wheel; LeMond Poprad

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fixed gear chain wear

FB, you write 'Slack is slack so as long as there's some slack at the tightest place.' This has been my thinking. If there is always some slack, however small, there is never really any tension. So why would it matter to add lots of slack rather than to just allow the minimum necessary? That's a mostly rhetorical question, at least for you. But in this thread I have been getting, or interpreting, conflicting messages.

1/16 of an inch of sag is very impressive. I don't try to go near that, though I do use high-end, NJS-certified cranks and rings and bottom brackets in an effort to keep things as concentric as possible.

At risk of taking this too long, I'll add one more thing from my fixed-gear chain experience. After being brought to just the right adjustment of slack, a new chain on the first ride away from home and over gravel sometimes actually begins to feel more taut. But the forward pull on the cog should be able to bring only the opposite. I wonder if particles getting between the chain parts take up the slack. Whatever the cause, I stop, get off and move the wheel forward a touch.

There actually seems much ado in the supposedly simple world of the fixed gear. But I love it, and want to get it right.

Thanks again.
Scott Bontz is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 06:09 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,646

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5755 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
Originally Posted by Scott Bontz
FB, you write 'Slack is slack so as long as there's some slack at the tightest place.' This has been my thinking. If there is always some slack, however small, there is never really any tension. So why would it matter to add lots of slack rather than to just allow the minimum necessary? That's a mostly rhetorical question, at least for you. But in this thread I have been getting, or interpreting, conflicting messages.

.
As you correctly gather there's no reason to add more slack than necessary. The standard sag guideline is only that, and based on typical eccentricity in the sprockets. But even industrial applications where there's good ability to control conditions leave generous slack.

On single speed freewheel applications, there's no reason to try to minimize backlash because it's not relevant, so it pays to err high.

But fixed wheel riders like to minimize the backlash because it feels better that way (the bike doesn't care). But dirt on the chains rollers can effectively make sprockets bigger and pull out some slack, so if that's your experience, allow for it.

BITD, this was never a big deal and nobody fretted over it, we simply pulled out the slack, leaving some in accordance with the guideline. However, when fixies became trendy some years back, newbs with no sense of history or old timers to offer guidance, misinterpreted the instruction to properly adjust chain tension to imply that was supposed to be tension.

If, some 5 years back we'd said,"be sure to properly set the chain slack", (as I do now) there probably wouldn't be any confusion, controversy or discussion.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 11-13-17 at 06:14 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 08:05 PM
  #29  
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Coeur d' Alene
Posts: 7,861

Bikes: 3 Chinese Gas Pipe Nerdcycles and 2 Chicago Electroforged Boat Anchors

Mentioned: 75 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2358 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Scott Bontz
But in this thread I have been getting, or interpreting, conflicting messages

Just to further the discussion and add more confusion, I'll expand on my experiences.

I don't know how FB gets away with such little slack.

I have some bikes where I was fortunate enough to be able to achieve perfect (measured) chain line. I installed a brand new KMC Z410. If I adjust the slack to 1/4 inch up from straight and 1/4 inch down from straight, totaling 1/2 inch of slack, it feels like hell and I can hear it making it's way around the sprockets. I can feel it in my hands in the garage and my feet when I ride it. My experience is that just because I can move the chain a half inch, that doesn't mean the chain is free to naturally relax and exploit that range on it's own. If I then adjust the chain to the point where there is visible droop, all sounds vanish (dead silent) and I can't feel anything while rotating the cranks. Huge real world difference. I've used the round shank of a screwdriver while rotating the cranks to attempt to ride the chain up and off of the front and rear sprocket and I can't, even when really trying hard to coax it off.

I'm not saying that FB (or anyone else) is wrong, I'm just saying that ALL my chains exhibit an audible and feelable state of mechanical happiness when they are allowed to be very relaxed.

I'll add this. Most chain adjustment advice runs along the lines of, "As little slack as possible, without creating tension." My approach (came from Dad) is from the opposite school, "Plenty of slack, without the possibility of derailment."

Last edited by SquidPuppet; 11-13-17 at 08:09 PM.
SquidPuppet is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 08:24 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,646

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5755 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
Just to further the discussion and add more confusion, I'll expand on my experiences.

I don't know how FB gets away with such little slack.
Excellent (non) eccentricity and good lubrication. It might also be that I never remove and clean that chain, so if dirt build up reduces the slack, I've already adjusted for that. Lastly it might be that my system is well broken in so it's more forgiving than brand new stuff may be.

Keep in mind that the upper loop is always running under tension and that's the same regardless of the amount of lower loop slack.

In any case, reducing slack to minimize backlash isn't necessary, it's just a nice thing. So my advice is to let your ears and feet guide you and go with the minimum slack needed for smooth running.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 09:41 PM
  #31  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,626

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
I gave up on adjusting my chain slack to any specific fraction of an inch. Now I just put my bike in the stand, gently spin the cranks, and adjust so that the chain still has a tiny bit of droop at its tightest point.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 11-13-17, 09:53 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,646

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5755 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
Likewise, I just use touch. I mount the wheel, push it back and slight closer to the left chainstay pulling the chain tight and tighten the right bolt, then when I center the wheel in the stay, it adds the chain slack and I'm good to go.

After mounting the wheel a few times I know just how much left chain stay bias will turn out right after centering, so I can do this in my sleep.

If that method doesn't give you enough slack, you can reverse it, pulling the wheel back and toward the right stay, and tightening the left side first, then straightening it will move the sprocket forward giving you slack.

Either way takes some trial and error at first until you learn how far off center to start with to end up rightmwhen centered. Once learned it's easy peasy from there on.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 11-13-17 at 09:58 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FastJake
Bicycle Mechanics
10
10-16-15 10:18 PM
cerealkilla
Road Cycling
32
01-05-14 11:30 PM
bikenh
Bicycle Mechanics
5
12-10-11 06:00 AM
jpsawyer
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
9
05-27-11 08:25 AM
Tabbed_Browsing
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
6
06-19-10 11:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.