Quick release skewers. Which to use, which to avoid?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Quick release skewers. Which to use, which to avoid?
I get that QR skewers can work perfectly well with a fixed gear bike. I am not looking to debate QR vs axle nuts.
Without getting into a long story, I am stuck with QR, but my issue is that I am having a hard time figuring out which QRs are best suited to fixed gear duty.
The QRs that I have in my possession and fit the axles/hubs I am using are these.

I have never used QR in this application.
I hear that enclosed cam is the way to go. I read that on SheldonBrown. Admittedly, I have never had an enclosed and open QR side by side to compare and tell what exactly the differences are. So, are these QRs in the pic the way to go? If not, what QR should be used?
Without getting into a long story, I am stuck with QR, but my issue is that I am having a hard time figuring out which QRs are best suited to fixed gear duty.
The QRs that I have in my possession and fit the axles/hubs I am using are these.

I have never used QR in this application.
I hear that enclosed cam is the way to go. I read that on SheldonBrown. Admittedly, I have never had an enclosed and open QR side by side to compare and tell what exactly the differences are. So, are these QRs in the pic the way to go? If not, what QR should be used?
Likes For mrmb:
#2
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2,510
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 2,131 Times
in
1,156 Posts
That one is internal cam, and should be ok. XT is one of the best.
The ones you need to be cautious about are external cam. I also would avoid the more expensive titanium skewers.
The best ones in my experience are steel DT Swiss skewers (which avoid the flip lever design entirely). You just crank them on like a thru-axle. A close second are Dura Ace/XT/Ultegra level internal cam quick release. Also Campy (who invented it).
The ones you need to be cautious about are external cam. I also would avoid the more expensive titanium skewers.
The best ones in my experience are steel DT Swiss skewers (which avoid the flip lever design entirely). You just crank them on like a thru-axle. A close second are Dura Ace/XT/Ultegra level internal cam quick release. Also Campy (who invented it).
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,533
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4010 Post(s)
Liked 2,889 Times
in
1,879 Posts
That QR is enclosed cam. Enclosed cam QRs have the lever coming out one side as that does, not symmetrically. Another tip - avoid non-steel skewers like aluminum or titanium. Both stretch a lot more than steel and therefor have a lot less holding power. (The manufacturers of ti and aluminum skewers could make them just as good and still lighter if they did what they do on frame tubing - increase the diameter. Of course, that would mean needing bigger axles which would require frames with bigger dropout slots (and just what we always needed; a whole new bike standard!)
The reason not to use QRs for fix gear has nothing to do with the holding power. It is simply simpler to have nuts for an easy way to get the chain slack correct and center the tire between the chainstays at the same time with just two hands. Push wheel back to approximate correct slack. Tighten right nut. Center the tire. Like the slack? Tighten left nut and done. No? Barely tighten left nut, loosen right and correct the slack. Tighten. Repeat rear. Done. Takes less time to do than to write and not brain power or coordination at all. With a QR, you have to get slack correct and center the tire and close QR simultaneously. Fast, yes, but if you are having a bad day, maybe not even possible.
I abandoned QRs for fix gear hubs 45 years ago and never looked back.
Now, if you are using a bike with dropouts, not rear facing track ends, you can use the adjusting screws common on better frames to correctly set the chain slack and wheel center. Then, with one hand, you push the wheel back 'till it hits both screws, then close the QR. I use those screws on my commuter that I never change cog size on (but I still use nuts).
Edit: On good, cheap skewers - cheap Shimanos are really good. Not light, sexy ... but simply work. Less elegant and I wouldn't run them for as many decades, the cheap QBP steel skewers. Now, old skewers, including the very best, used an older cam design that didn't lock as securely. This includes the revered Campagnolos. That $10 QBP QR is a much more secure QR than the very best NOS early '80s Campy.
The reason not to use QRs for fix gear has nothing to do with the holding power. It is simply simpler to have nuts for an easy way to get the chain slack correct and center the tire between the chainstays at the same time with just two hands. Push wheel back to approximate correct slack. Tighten right nut. Center the tire. Like the slack? Tighten left nut and done. No? Barely tighten left nut, loosen right and correct the slack. Tighten. Repeat rear. Done. Takes less time to do than to write and not brain power or coordination at all. With a QR, you have to get slack correct and center the tire and close QR simultaneously. Fast, yes, but if you are having a bad day, maybe not even possible.
I abandoned QRs for fix gear hubs 45 years ago and never looked back.
Now, if you are using a bike with dropouts, not rear facing track ends, you can use the adjusting screws common on better frames to correctly set the chain slack and wheel center. Then, with one hand, you push the wheel back 'till it hits both screws, then close the QR. I use those screws on my commuter that I never change cog size on (but I still use nuts).
Edit: On good, cheap skewers - cheap Shimanos are really good. Not light, sexy ... but simply work. Less elegant and I wouldn't run them for as many decades, the cheap QBP steel skewers. Now, old skewers, including the very best, used an older cam design that didn't lock as securely. This includes the revered Campagnolos. That $10 QBP QR is a much more secure QR than the very best NOS early '80s Campy.
Last edited by 79pmooney; 12-31-22 at 12:55 PM.
#4
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2,510
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 2,131 Times
in
1,156 Posts
Another cheap but solid option is hex-key-lock skewers. Get the ones that are all steel, including the nuts. You can crank them down really hard, and they won't move around at all.
#5
Full Member
Thread Starter
Got a part number, or product name or anything? Looking around, manufacturers tend not to list the shaft and nut material on retailers sites, not where I have looked anyways.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
So with a QR set up, what’s more important….shaft material or nut material? Or are they equally important?
Last edited by mrmb; 12-31-22 at 02:06 PM.
#7
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2,510
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 2,131 Times
in
1,156 Posts
Probably shaft, but if you really want to crank it down, you could strip aluminum threads, so find a steel nut.
I bought these in 2019
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...TF8&th=1&psc=1
but had to change out the aluminum nut on the drive side for steel.
I bought these in 2019
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...TF8&th=1&psc=1
but had to change out the aluminum nut on the drive side for steel.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,135
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3589 Post(s)
Liked 2,052 Times
in
1,047 Posts
Personally I prefer solid nutted axles but quick release axles can be made to work....Make sure to use chain tugs with your quick release...They prevent slippage, help adjust chain tension and help to center a wheel...I use chain tugs on my nutted axles just for some extra security.
#9
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 11,462
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3553 Post(s)
Liked 2,881 Times
in
1,927 Posts
I would definitely not use external cam skewers and look for good internal cam. My favorite is the Stainless Steel RWS Levers from DT Swiss. However Shimano, Campagnolo and Paul make some good ones as well. The Pauls are nice but I think I like the DTs a little better but Paul stuff always looks nice and is well made.
Also agreed, no aluminum or titanium, great metals poor for QRs.
However like others have said a nutted axle is the way to go when you can. For the front wheel QR is fine but the rear is made much easier with nutted wheels like 79pmooney suggested. Chain tensioners could be another good thing to have with the QR. I tend to find them a bit fiddly when I have dealt with them in the very distant past but could be handy with a QR as wolfchild suggested.
Also agreed, no aluminum or titanium, great metals poor for QRs.
However like others have said a nutted axle is the way to go when you can. For the front wheel QR is fine but the rear is made much easier with nutted wheels like 79pmooney suggested. Chain tensioners could be another good thing to have with the QR. I tend to find them a bit fiddly when I have dealt with them in the very distant past but could be handy with a QR as wolfchild suggested.
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
Looks like the skewer shaft and nut on my Shimano deore xt QR set are both steel, so that’s good. Still open to other options, but that is what is in my hands right now.
Do these tend to be made to be tightened down with a 5mm allen? Or is it 6mm?
Do these tend to be made to be tightened down with a 5mm allen? Or is it 6mm?
#11
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 2,510
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 2,131 Times
in
1,156 Posts
I think it is 5mm
#12
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,207
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 148 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3246 Post(s)
Liked 2,650 Times
in
1,541 Posts
External cam is fine on a front wheel, but not the rear. You want internal cam for the rear.
N.B. despite what @79pmooney says above, I've never had a problem with Campagnolo and other skewers from the 70s and 80s, but maybe I'm just not the animal he is.
N.B. despite what @79pmooney says above, I've never had a problem with Campagnolo and other skewers from the 70s and 80s, but maybe I'm just not the animal he is.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenwood SC USA
Posts: 2,027
Bikes: 2002 Mercian Vincitore, 1982 Mercian Colorado, 1976 Puch Royal X, 1974 Allegro No. 76, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh GS, 1971 Gitane Tour de France and others
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 996 Times
in
532 Posts
I've run vintage steel q/r skewers for fixed-gears since 1998. The last decade or so I've standardized on '70s M.M. Atom/Maillard pattern skewers, which so far have never been a problem and haven't slipped. They're all steel with an internal cam, cheap and plentiful. I have not felt the need to run chain tugs, but perhaps my pedal action and power don't require them. I've run this setup on both forward-facing "horizontal" dropouts and rear-facing track ends with no issues.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,234
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3733 Post(s)
Liked 2,544 Times
in
1,517 Posts
That's an internal cam XT. Internal cam is good. Steel is good. As far as XT, is it the correct axle length?