larger cog & chainring vs smaller
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
From: Salem, MA
Bikes: Land Shark, Level Professional, Tsunami singlespeed, Giant Reign 1
larger cog & chainring vs smaller
Is there any advantage using a large chainring + large cog over a smaller chainring + smaller cog when setting up a given gearing?
#2
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Bikes: Custom Columbus Steel 18spd w/ Nashbar & Ultegra Parts / Mercier Kilo TT / Fixed Conversion with all Nashbar Parts
The only advantage I can think of is with the bigger chainring / bigger cog would be that the chain has MORE teeth to engage on, which might make you feel more secure knowing it has less of a chance to fall off. Another advantage perhaps is weight for the weight weenies.
Chad
Chad
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
a small set-up will be lighter but will wear out quicker. a big set-up also makes you tougher even if it is the same ratio. I used to ride 39x15 (69") and never got any action. now that I ride 52x20 (69") I get more action than Ice-T.
#5
coasterbrakelockup
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: parts unknown
Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
Bigger chainrings/cogs will spread out the wear over more teeth theoretically.
But mostly big chainrings just look cool.
But mostly big chainrings just look cool.
#6
Originally Posted by potus
a small set-up will be lighter but will wear out quicker. a big set-up also makes you tougher even if it is the same ratio. I used to ride 39x15 (69") and never got any action. now that I ride 52x20 (69") I get more action than Ice-T.
#7
Jim Shapiro
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Colorado
Bikes: Bianchi Imola (road), Bianchi Axis (general), Centurion Elite RS (fixed gear), Centurion Elite GS (lunch rides at work), Miyata (work in progress), Trek 7000 (mountain biking)
Originally Posted by lz4005
Bigger chainrings/cogs will spread out the wear over more teeth theoretically. ...
Jim
#8
Originally Posted by jimshapiro
I don't think so. Each time the back wheel makes a complete revolution all of the teeth on the cog have "done their job" once, whether there are 15, 17, or even 25 teeth (same logic holds for the chainring, with a factor for the gear ratio). It seems to me that the chain is what gets a bigger workout with larger gears. You've engaged and disengaged one revolution's worth of teeth and that could be 15, 17, or even 25 chain links. No?
Jim
Jim
#9
Beausage is Beautiful

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 13
From: Saitama, Japan
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
Aren't smaller cog's technically less efficient? I think I remember reading something to that effect...
__________________
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
Last edited by Fugazi Dave; 12-29-05 at 05:37 PM.
#13
coasterbrakelockup
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: parts unknown
Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
Originally Posted by Fugazi Dave
Aren't smaller cog's technically less efficient? I think I remember reading something to that effect...
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by lz4005
Very small cogs can start introducing more drag from bending the chain around a smaller diameter. Not to mention that it is easier to throw the chain with fewer teeth engaged at any one time.





