Better new frameset than IRO?
#26
dances with bicycle
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 1,683
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rikardi151
HRRRM... 59?well, if you are comfortable on a 62, and Im about 2 inches shorter, Id think the 59 would work for me... Youd think with the number of them I see around here there would be a dealer.
#27
...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SF
Posts: 3
Bikes: '76 mixte Bertin (Durifort), IRO Angus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just want to echo that IRO's quoted stand-over will be better for determining fit than the measurement they term "size." My friend, 5'10", recently bought a "53cm" Angus (granted, that's the lower end of his size range), and the frame ended up becoming mine (I'm 5'2" - yes, it's at the high end of my size range, but still). It's definitely a good idea to try one in person, if you can make it happen.
#28
redonkulous
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Philly
Posts: 837
Bikes: 2001 GT GTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, I ended up buying a 56 cm GTB... Heres hoping itl work for me when it arrives on Wed!
#29
greatest man alive
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: oneco
Posts: 224
Bikes: basso track, rossin track, diamond and ruby studded pocket bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
why not save up for a little bit longer and get a debernardi. arent those things like 500? or atleast a eai bareknuckle frame