A discussion of budget fixed-specific frames/complete bikes
#226
Volume Track...under six.
VOTE YES
VOTE YES
__________________
Originally Posted by dutret
trackosaurusrex.com is just about the best thing ever!
#227
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Originally Posted by joshua_boston
Hi people,
Well, I am not allowed to talk prices. Cause, my friend who has a small shop, almost lost his account with a major bike brand cause he was charging less money then everyone else. Basically the big stores complained with the bike manufacturer and they almost stopped selling there bikes to him. Well, this means to me that there is PRICE FIXING with the bikes... what do you think. That means we the consumer are paying to much money$$$$. This is a sad day in the bike world.
Well, I am not allowed to talk prices. Cause, my friend who has a small shop, almost lost his account with a major bike brand cause he was charging less money then everyone else. Basically the big stores complained with the bike manufacturer and they almost stopped selling there bikes to him. Well, this means to me that there is PRICE FIXING with the bikes... what do you think. That means we the consumer are paying to much money$$$$. This is a sad day in the bike world.
Price fixing would be if Trek, Giant, Felt, Specialized, Cannondale, Bianchi, et al, got together and agreed on prices for their bikes.
#228
on a steel horse I ride
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia PA
Bikes: 2007 Raleigh Rush Hour
After months of exhaustive research on which budget bike to buy (conclusion: there's very little difference, buy what feels good to you), I just bought an '07 Raleigh Rush Hour today (my first SS/FG; I'm a BMX convert). Unless I'm mistaken, the decals now appear to be under the clearcoat. I guess Raleigh got tired of people making it look like a no-name. Not sure if that makes a difference to anyone, but that seemed to be a selling point of the '06.
#229
the new 2007 frames are up
#230
Originally Posted by LeaderBike
#232
Sheldon Brown's posse
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: Oz-tray-lee-ah
Bikes: BMC SL01, XtC, Rhythm GX and a frankenstein avalanche 2.0
Originally Posted by LeaderBike
#234
i like bikes.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: 614, Ohio
Bikes: iro rob roy - ss cross, iro mark v pro - fixed, bianchi via nirone 7 - road, trek 1000 - 1x9 city bike w/ rack
i bought one off ebay to get in to riding fixed, and so far i like it. it's nothing special, but it holds up.
#235
Originally Posted by LeaderBike
you might want to double check the geometry for that frame....something is off. According to whats posted, the headtube of the 57 cm frame is shorter than the headtube for the 54 cm. That can't be right.
#236
Bye Bye
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 2
From: Gone gone gone
Just built a CrossCheck as a FG/SS (had I to do it over it would be FG/FG).
$1095
xc frame
cane creek brakes and levers
salsa rims (delgado's? cross rims)
surly 32 hole hubs
salsa bell lap bars
sugino crank (low end)
surly dingle cog
not as cheap as some... previous i had a redline 925 that i never got into.
the redline cost me something like $495
$1095
xc frame
cane creek brakes and levers
salsa rims (delgado's? cross rims)
surly 32 hole hubs
salsa bell lap bars
sugino crank (low end)
surly dingle cog
not as cheap as some... previous i had a redline 925 that i never got into.
the redline cost me something like $495
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
#237
Dime Piece
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi PUSS, Bianchi PISTA, 3Rensho, Redline 925 (repainted with pink sparkle coat)
Hi! My best friend is looking to build up a bike or buy a complete bike that she can ride single speed and later convert to fixed gear. She is petite, light, 5'3-5'4, probably looking at 49cm frames. Her inseam is 29 inches, so we're looking at a standover height around there. Anything bigger than a 50cm frame is too big for her.
She's looking to spend no more than $300, which seems impossible. Is it?!
She's not picky about condition/color, as long as it is rideable and we can work on it.
We've been checking out Craigslist and Ebay and looking at new track frames like Pake, etc. but after frame and fork price, we've still got a lot of buying to do for all the parts to build it up, and we'd be taking it to a shop here in Boston for them to do it.
Any suggestions?
She's looking to spend no more than $300, which seems impossible. Is it?!
She's not picky about condition/color, as long as it is rideable and we can work on it.
We've been checking out Craigslist and Ebay and looking at new track frames like Pake, etc. but after frame and fork price, we've still got a lot of buying to do for all the parts to build it up, and we'd be taking it to a shop here in Boston for them to do it.
Any suggestions?
#238
Originally Posted by xmcdonaldx
Hi! My best friend is looking to build up a bike or buy a complete bike that she can ride single speed and later convert to fixed gear. She is petite, light, 5'3-5'4, probably looking at 49cm frames. Her inseam is 29 inches, so we're looking at a standover height around there. Anything bigger than a 50cm frame is too big for her.
She's looking to spend no more than $300, which seems impossible. Is it?!
She's not picky about condition/color, as long as it is rideable and we can work on it.
We've been checking out Craigslist and Ebay and looking at new track frames like Pake, etc. but after frame and fork price, we've still got a lot of buying to do for all the parts to build it up, and we'd be taking it to a shop here in Boston for them to do it.
Any suggestions?
She's looking to spend no more than $300, which seems impossible. Is it?!
She's not picky about condition/color, as long as it is rideable and we can work on it.
We've been checking out Craigslist and Ebay and looking at new track frames like Pake, etc. but after frame and fork price, we've still got a lot of buying to do for all the parts to build it up, and we'd be taking it to a shop here in Boston for them to do it.
Any suggestions?
EDIT: Oh and there's this bike from SE for $250, but it looks like poo.
#239
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
anyone here have an opinion on the new schwinn madison's?
https://bicyclesource.us/itemdetails.cfm?ID=13974
they look really nice and as a complete bike goes, it looks really nice (comparable to the track or pista).
sizing is giving me a bit of a headache as they come in S, M, L, X-L. what the **** is that? does anyone know roughly what this translates too?
https://bicyclesource.us/itemdetails.cfm?ID=13974
they look really nice and as a complete bike goes, it looks really nice (comparable to the track or pista).
sizing is giving me a bit of a headache as they come in S, M, L, X-L. what the **** is that? does anyone know roughly what this translates too?
#241
on a steel horse I ride
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia PA
Bikes: 2007 Raleigh Rush Hour
Originally Posted by Retem
eai brass knuckle frame super smooth stiff and quick great frme at three bills
Surly is making a Steamroller complete now...if this is not a new development, I apologize. Check your LBS, but JensonUSA.com is selling them for $630, shipped. I wish I knew that before I bought my Rush Hour a few months back. C'est la vie.
#243
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Bikes: 1.5 Raleighs
https://www29.instantestore.net/merch...d_ld_735tr.cfm
what do they mean by "true aero down tube" and "Made exclusively for track" is there a reason this cant be used on a bike used on the street?
what do they mean by "true aero down tube" and "Made exclusively for track" is there a reason this cant be used on a bike used on the street?
#244
Originally Posted by Hopetoditchcar
https://www29.instantestore.net/merch...d_ld_735tr.cfm
what do they mean by "true aero down tube" and "Made exclusively for track" is there a reason this cant be used on a bike used on the street?
what do they mean by "true aero down tube" and "Made exclusively for track" is there a reason this cant be used on a bike used on the street?
bike couldn't be ridden on the street, except that there
are not typically brake holes on a track frame.
#245
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Bikes: 1.5 Raleighs
sorry about that, heres the link https://www29.instantestore.net/merch...d_ld_735tr.cfm
why is this pure track geometry? and what is that "true aero down tube" for?
why is this pure track geometry? and what is that "true aero down tube" for?
#246
crotchety young dude
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
From: SF, CA
Bikes: IRO Angus; Casati Gold Line; Redline 925; '72 Schwinn Olympic Paramount
Aerofashiondynamics.
(Forget who said that originally.)
(Forget who said that originally.)
#248
Originally Posted by Hopetoditchcar
what does having "track geometry" entail
Last edited by Ken Wind; 05-09-07 at 04:24 PM.
#249
SSSSTIN
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 1
From: Lil' Beirut
Bikes: IRO angus, raliegh ss conversion.
fuji
soo, this may have been previously discussed but what is the deal with the cheap fuki track frames, besides being ugly. are they at all decent for the 250 range?
#250
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
KHS Flite 100 vs. IRO Angus
i thought i'd post my question here instead of making another "versus" thread and hopefully i'll get some help. i've been looking into buying a complete bike and have it narrowed down to the KHS Flite 100 or the IRO Angus... Used just for city commuting, probably never make it onto a track
Here's my noobie understanding of the comparison:
-Angus has more of a road geometry which will make riding more comfortable
-Angus is lighter than the Flite b/c it's made of reynolds 631 and the Flite is made of 520
-Flite comes with better quality components (or so says my LBS)
-Flite's wheels aren't good quality
It seems like the IRO is a better choice for my purposes, but I like the look of the KHS more, and it's the only one i'm able to test drive. I'm also just as concerned with quality and price as I am with geometry. So my main question is whether the KHS's geometry and weight should prevent me from getting it. Is the "road geomtery" that much more comforatble? Thanks!
i thought i'd post my question here instead of making another "versus" thread and hopefully i'll get some help. i've been looking into buying a complete bike and have it narrowed down to the KHS Flite 100 or the IRO Angus... Used just for city commuting, probably never make it onto a track
Here's my noobie understanding of the comparison:
-Angus has more of a road geometry which will make riding more comfortable
-Angus is lighter than the Flite b/c it's made of reynolds 631 and the Flite is made of 520
-Flite comes with better quality components (or so says my LBS)
-Flite's wheels aren't good quality
It seems like the IRO is a better choice for my purposes, but I like the look of the KHS more, and it's the only one i'm able to test drive. I'm also just as concerned with quality and price as I am with geometry. So my main question is whether the KHS's geometry and weight should prevent me from getting it. Is the "road geomtery" that much more comforatble? Thanks!
Last edited by ericdw; 05-13-07 at 08:09 PM.




