Gear inches mental formula?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: On the intramaweb thing.
Bikes: Steel geared. Steel Fix.
Gear inches mental formula?
I have a friend who has a 'trick'. Give him any date and he'll tell you what day of the week it is... For example if you say to him 5th of March 2001, he'll reply "Wednesday"... That example is probably not correct so don't bag me out for getting it wrong!!!
He says its easy and just a mathermatical formula...
Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone knows the mathematical fomula for gear inches. So if someone were to say "48/18" I could reply with a smartass "72". Or "50/15" - "92".
Sheldon Brown has an online calculator. I could work it out on a calculator. But I want to be able to do it mentally... Does some clever b*****d know this? It'd have to be real simple....
He says its easy and just a mathermatical formula...
Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone knows the mathematical fomula for gear inches. So if someone were to say "48/18" I could reply with a smartass "72". Or "50/15" - "92".
Sheldon Brown has an online calculator. I could work it out on a calculator. But I want to be able to do it mentally... Does some clever b*****d know this? It'd have to be real simple....
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: On the intramaweb thing.
Bikes: Steel geared. Steel Fix.
Originally Posted by thurstonboise
(Chainring/Cog) * 27 will get you close enough for road wheels.
#4
LF for the accentdeprived
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,549
Likes: 0
From: Budapest, Hungary
If you need anything simpler that that, you'll have to carry a calculator or a friend with an operating brain.
The actual formula is way more complicated, taking into account rim size, tyre and crank arm size. You can't go any simpler than Chainring/cog multiplied by something.
If you want to know how a modification changes the feel of your own bike, that's simpler. E.g. if you put on a 48 chainring instead of the 44 you have now, the gear will get 48/44 your current one, i.e. 9% higher. 18 instead of 16 cog=> 16/18, i.e. 11% lower gear
If you want to mess around with both chainring and cog, then memorize the ratio of your current combo. 44/16 is 2.75. If you go 55/20, that's also 2.75=> same gear. 48/14=3.43, which is wicked high, of course.
The actual formula is way more complicated, taking into account rim size, tyre and crank arm size. You can't go any simpler than Chainring/cog multiplied by something.
If you want to know how a modification changes the feel of your own bike, that's simpler. E.g. if you put on a 48 chainring instead of the 44 you have now, the gear will get 48/44 your current one, i.e. 9% higher. 18 instead of 16 cog=> 16/18, i.e. 11% lower gear
If you want to mess around with both chainring and cog, then memorize the ratio of your current combo. 44/16 is 2.75. If you go 55/20, that's also 2.75=> same gear. 48/14=3.43, which is wicked high, of course.
#5
jack of one or two trades
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CT
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
Originally Posted by LóFarkas
The actual formula is way more complicated, taking into account rim size, tyre and crank arm size.
#6
tried to coast once
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Benicia, CA
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Calfee Tetra Pro
on a somewhat related note, are there opinions about running larger vs smaller chainrings/cogs in the same ratio? such as a 48/18=2.667=72 inches vs a 45/17=2.65= 71.5 inches. Roughly the same, but does the larger cog in the rear (in the first example) give you better torque or is it offset by the smaller chainring in the front in the second example?
#8
Geek Extraordinaire
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
Bikes: Bianchi Advantage Fixed Conversion; Specialized Stumpjumper FS Hardtail
Originally Posted by chinnt
on a somewhat related note, are there opinions about running larger vs smaller chainrings/cogs in the same ratio? such as a 48/18=2.667=72 inches vs a 45/17=2.65= 71.5 inches. Roughly the same, but does the larger cog in the rear (in the first example) give you better torque or is it offset by the smaller chainring in the front in the second example?
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Sintesi Conversion Serotta Track
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Sintesi Conversion Serotta Track
#10
Spelling Snob
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 2
From: Plano, Texas
Bikes: Panasonic DX4000, Bianchi Pista
I dont think theres an easy way. At the track, I see the record-holding coaches reach for their gear inch chart when they need to know.
__________________

The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!

The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: On the intramaweb thing.
Bikes: Steel geared. Steel Fix.
I might have to do it the old 'repetition arithmetic' way. You know, saying out loud 2x2 is 4, 2x4 is 8 etc.
Rear cog 11 to 20, chainring 46 to 50. Thats only 50 numbers to memorise... Shouldn't be too hard... Hmmmm.
Although the brain aint what is used to be at school...
Rear cog 11 to 20, chainring 46 to 50. Thats only 50 numbers to memorise... Shouldn't be too hard... Hmmmm.
Although the brain aint what is used to be at school...
#13
Mernber
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: G'ville, FL / Rossie, MA
Bikes: '03 Dahon Speed 8 / '06 Dahon Boardwalk S1 Fixed
If you're just wanting to impress people, you could just memorize the most common ratios per wheel size. Just pretend like you're doing calculations in your head





