gear ratios...again...noob
#26
MADE IN HONG KONG
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,763
Bikes: some but not enough
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LóFarkas
Haha, .
My take on the matter is that gear ratio is reciprocally proportional to d!ck size (Hey, it applies to mplsminx!)
Shame is justified if you're slow, not if you ride a low gear. Spinning a 150 cadence at 25mph with a low gear is soooo much more impressive than rolling 10 mph on 90 gear inches...
My take on the matter is that gear ratio is reciprocally proportional to d!ck size (Hey, it applies to mplsminx!)
Shame is justified if you're slow, not if you ride a low gear. Spinning a 150 cadence at 25mph with a low gear is soooo much more impressive than rolling 10 mph on 90 gear inches...
If you are slow, riding a big gear will only make you slower (on avg)
gear for the climbs and learn to spin on the flats
#29
Crapzeit!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNCLR
I started out on 48x18 in SF with a brake. Then I took off the brake. A new crank purchase sent me up to 49x18. It was plenty of gear for me. This past weekend while I was there I had loaner bike that was 51x18 or something. Definitely harder to stop, skid, slow down. I would HIGHLY recommend starting on a smaller gear and working your way up.
I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".
Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-fuck halifax.
m.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 268
Bikes: 56cm IRO Mark V
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a noob ques
so these ratios, can you compare them using gear inches?
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?
So in that case, can't u use different chainrings on two diff bikes with diff cogs that give the same ratio each and wouldn't those bikes be the same in the chainline? For instance 42x13 and 13x42. is there such a thing? no i imagine the stresses on the 13t chainring from your pedaling would bend the teeth.
See that was something that was on my noggin.
so these ratios, can you compare them using gear inches?
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?
So in that case, can't u use different chainrings on two diff bikes with diff cogs that give the same ratio each and wouldn't those bikes be the same in the chainline? For instance 42x13 and 13x42. is there such a thing? no i imagine the stresses on the 13t chainring from your pedaling would bend the teeth.
See that was something that was on my noggin.
#31
Crapzeit!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sunv
can't u use different chainrings on two diff bikes with diff cogs that give the same ratio each and wouldn't those bikes be the same in the chainline?
#32
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
<i>so these ratios, can you compare them using gear inches?
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?</i>
yes that is exactly what the number is for
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?</i>
yes that is exactly what the number is for
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760
Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride 2 to 1 on fixed and SS (I ride alot of cross and MTB and, love a fast spin vs. mashing a higher gear). I find fixed easier than SS (imo). When I spin out on SS I'm SOL. When I spin out fixed I just relax my legs and let the cranks take over. I have a good friend that is the other way around. He can rock a single and has a hard time on fixed. It all comes down to your spin style.
#34
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sfcrossrider
When I spin out on SS I'm SOL. When I spin out fixed I just relax my legs and let the cranks take over.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,290
Bikes: Sparton(custon track), Fuji
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
minutely more.
#36
Banned
Originally Posted by dutret
Good for you, you have knees of steel. Mashing is alot harder on your knees then spinning is no matter how you bike fits or how good your pedaling technique is.
#37
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
-it's not exactly spinning fast either.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
#38
Senior Member
Originally Posted by mcatano
I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".
Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.
m.
Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.
m.
#39
Crapzeit!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNCLR
I think the operative word there was "sounded". 42x16 sounds dinky. I didn't do the calculations before I posted, but yes, you are right. 42x16=71 gear inches while 49x18=73.5. My point was to start out with lower gear and work your way up.
#40
Banned
Originally Posted by dutret
-it's not exactly spinning fast either.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
my best speed vs cadence comes in at about 82-85rpm
you wanna spin at 90-100+ go right ahead, but dont complain when you find yourself unable to go much faster than 20mph LOL. me, being able to do 25-27mph when I need to is a nice tool to have, and I cant do it and hold it with a dinky little 70 inch gear
#41
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: not where i used to be
Posts: 4,847
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mcatano
I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".
Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.
m.
Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.
m.
[edit] hey! where did it go? [/edit]
Last edited by baxtefer; 09-15-06 at 04:23 PM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760
Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
huh? Isn't coasting preferable to slowing yourself down by letting the pedals drag you around?
#43
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
relaxing your legs and letting momentum pull your feet around = slowing down even faster though. Your feet can only move soo fast.
I ride around 2:1 ss and rigth below 30mph on road or a bit less on trails my feet just can't keep up anymore so I start coasting. This allows me to go alot faster on steep descents. If I was fixed instead I would not be able to coast. Sure I could get my feet going faster by letting the cranks pull them around but that would be taking energy that could be keeping the bike speed up and wasting it pulling my feet in little circles. After the point at which you spinout on a ss you are just scrubbing off speed with your legs on a fixie. You spin out on the ss because you legs are incapable of applying force to pedals at higher speeds.
Sorry, if that was a bit convoluted but the simple physics of the situation dictate that allowing the pedals to pull your feet around(even smoothly) is going to be slower then coasting unless you have the worlds worst freewheel or something.
I ride around 2:1 ss and rigth below 30mph on road or a bit less on trails my feet just can't keep up anymore so I start coasting. This allows me to go alot faster on steep descents. If I was fixed instead I would not be able to coast. Sure I could get my feet going faster by letting the cranks pull them around but that would be taking energy that could be keeping the bike speed up and wasting it pulling my feet in little circles. After the point at which you spinout on a ss you are just scrubbing off speed with your legs on a fixie. You spin out on the ss because you legs are incapable of applying force to pedals at higher speeds.
Sorry, if that was a bit convoluted but the simple physics of the situation dictate that allowing the pedals to pull your feet around(even smoothly) is going to be slower then coasting unless you have the worlds worst freewheel or something.
#44
Crapzeit!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#45
like, really sloppy
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: calipornia
Posts: 2,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
Being able to spin is a lot cooler than being able to mash. Any idiot can mash. In my mind, it's like the difference between standing and trackstanding at a red light.
spinning is the ****.. spinning is the new riser bar.. embrace it