Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

gear ratios...again...noob

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

gear ratios...again...noob

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-06, 08:37 AM
  #26  
MADE IN HONG KONG
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,763

Bikes: some but not enough

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LóFarkas
Haha, .

My take on the matter is that gear ratio is reciprocally proportional to d!ck size (Hey, it applies to mplsminx!)

Shame is justified if you're slow, not if you ride a low gear. Spinning a 150 cadence at 25mph with a low gear is soooo much more impressive than rolling 10 mph on 90 gear inches...
+++

If you are slow, riding a big gear will only make you slower (on avg)

gear for the climbs and learn to spin on the flats
poopncow is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 08:53 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
shishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,290

Bikes: Sparton(custon track), Fuji

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
w/ the big chainring up front takes more to get going
shishi is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 08:55 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
minutely more.
dutret is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:06 AM
  #29  
Crapzeit!
 
mcatano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNCLR
I started out on 48x18 in SF with a brake. Then I took off the brake. A new crank purchase sent me up to 49x18. It was plenty of gear for me. This past weekend while I was there I had loaner bike that was 51x18 or something. Definitely harder to stop, skid, slow down. I would HIGHLY recommend starting on a smaller gear and working your way up.

I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".

Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-fuck halifax.

m.
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:20 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 268

Bikes: 56cm IRO Mark V

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a noob ques
so these ratios, can you compare them using gear inches?
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?

So in that case, can't u use different chainrings on two diff bikes with diff cogs that give the same ratio each and wouldn't those bikes be the same in the chainline? For instance 42x13 and 13x42. is there such a thing? no i imagine the stresses on the 13t chainring from your pedaling would bend the teeth.

See that was something that was on my noggin.
sunv is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:26 AM
  #31  
Crapzeit!
 
mcatano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sunv
can't u use different chainrings on two diff bikes with diff cogs that give the same ratio each and wouldn't those bikes be the same in the chainline?
I'm not sure what chainline has to do with it, but yeah. You can use the different chainring/cog combinations to give you approximately equivalent gear inches. ie, 42x15 and 45x16 are both approximately 75".
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:29 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
<i>so these ratios, can you compare them using gear inches?
Like upper 80s inches means more speed on flats but total mashing up hills, and lower 60s inches means low speed on flats and spinning crazy down hills. Am I correct on this?</i>

yes that is exactly what the number is for
dutret is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:40 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
sfcrossrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760

Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride 2 to 1 on fixed and SS (I ride alot of cross and MTB and, love a fast spin vs. mashing a higher gear). I find fixed easier than SS (imo). When I spin out on SS I'm SOL. When I spin out fixed I just relax my legs and let the cranks take over. I have a good friend that is the other way around. He can rock a single and has a hard time on fixed. It all comes down to your spin style.
sfcrossrider is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 09:45 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sfcrossrider
When I spin out on SS I'm SOL. When I spin out fixed I just relax my legs and let the cranks take over.
huh? Isn't coasting preferable to slowing yourself down by letting the pedals drag you around?
dutret is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 10:37 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
shishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,290

Bikes: Sparton(custon track), Fuji

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
minutely more.
Standing start at the track it does make a diff.
shishi is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 11:13 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under bridge in cardboard box
Posts: 5,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 501 Times in 397 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
Good for you, you have knees of steel. Mashing is alot harder on your knees then spinning is no matter how you bike fits or how good your pedaling technique is.
spinning a 52/17 or 52/16 at 90 rpm isnt mashing
pedex is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 11:17 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
-it's not exactly spinning fast either.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
dutret is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 11:51 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
TNCLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 911

Bikes: Cinelli Supercorsa, Nagasawa Special, Moots Compact, Gunnar Roadie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mcatano
I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".

Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.

m.
I think the operative word there was "sounded". 42x16 sounds dinky. I didn't do the calculations before I posted, but yes, you are right. 42x16=71 gear inches while 49x18=73.5. My point was to start out with lower gear and work your way up.
TNCLR is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 12:25 PM
  #39  
Crapzeit!
 
mcatano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TNCLR
I think the operative word there was "sounded". 42x16 sounds dinky. I didn't do the calculations before I posted, but yes, you are right. 42x16=71 gear inches while 49x18=73.5. My point was to start out with lower gear and work your way up.
Totally valid.
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 04:07 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under bridge in cardboard box
Posts: 5,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 501 Times in 397 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
-it's not exactly spinning fast either.
-you've got to mash it up there.
-unless you are insanely strong you are mashing that up hills.
on the hills here you get out of the saddle and climb, which isnt tough on the knees at all really

my best speed vs cadence comes in at about 82-85rpm

you wanna spin at 90-100+ go right ahead, but dont complain when you find yourself unable to go much faster than 20mph LOL. me, being able to do 25-27mph when I need to is a nice tool to have, and I cant do it and hold it with a dinky little 70 inch gear
pedex is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 04:16 PM
  #41  
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
baxtefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: not where i used to be
Posts: 4,847
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mcatano
I think I'm confused... you said that 42x16 sounded dinky, but you ride 48/49x18? Those gearings are pretty similar. 42x16 is about 71", and 48x18 is about 72".

Anyway, I ride 46x17 and 50x19 in hilly-as-**** halifax.

m.
hey, how did you get **** past the filter?

[edit] hey! where did it go? [/edit]

Last edited by baxtefer; 09-15-06 at 04:23 PM.
baxtefer is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 05:18 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
sfcrossrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760

Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
huh? Isn't coasting preferable to slowing yourself down by letting the pedals drag you around?
Coasting with a single speed = slowing down. You don't have the fixed wheel to help keep your speed up. It's more of a spin fast, recover/coast, spin fast, recover/coast. They both offer challenges in their own way. I just find fixed easier (IMO). I also spent the better part of 13 years racing track (you learn alot like how to relax you legs with out having your peddals drag you all over the place so you can recover from a sprint or hard effort in a race) so... the idea of being locked into my rig isn't a big deal. That's why it's good to ride ALOT of different types and styles of bikes. Helps to open your eyes to how hard the other guys style of riding really is.
sfcrossrider is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 05:51 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
relaxing your legs and letting momentum pull your feet around = slowing down even faster though. Your feet can only move soo fast.

I ride around 2:1 ss and rigth below 30mph on road or a bit less on trails my feet just can't keep up anymore so I start coasting. This allows me to go alot faster on steep descents. If I was fixed instead I would not be able to coast. Sure I could get my feet going faster by letting the cranks pull them around but that would be taking energy that could be keeping the bike speed up and wasting it pulling my feet in little circles. After the point at which you spinout on a ss you are just scrubbing off speed with your legs on a fixie. You spin out on the ss because you legs are incapable of applying force to pedals at higher speeds.

Sorry, if that was a bit convoluted but the simple physics of the situation dictate that allowing the pedals to pull your feet around(even smoothly) is going to be slower then coasting unless you have the worlds worst freewheel or something.
dutret is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 07:57 PM
  #44  
Crapzeit!
 
mcatano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by baxtefer
hey, how did you get **** past the filter?

[edit] hey! where did it go? [/edit]
I have powers.
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Old 09-15-06, 08:57 PM
  #45  
like, really sloppy
 
sloppy robot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: calipornia
Posts: 2,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
Being able to spin is a lot cooler than being able to mash. Any idiot can mash. In my mind, it's like the difference between standing and trackstanding at a red light.
i concur!

spinning is the ****.. spinning is the new riser bar.. embrace it
sloppy robot is offline  
Old 09-16-06, 01:04 PM
  #46  
YOU ARE NOW TUNED IN
 
No_Minkah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The City that Works
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
trestestestes
No_Minkah is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.