fixed frame sizing
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Bikes: old peugeot coversion, de bernardi
fixed frame sizing
hi all, i ride a peugeot road frame that i converted into a fixed gear over a year ago. i ride it every day and love it, everything feels great. now i'm planning on buying a frame that is actually pretty nice (a debernardi thron track) and seeing as i'm laying out quite a lot of cash (at least for me) i want to make sure the sizing is right. there aren't any shops around me that carry the bike so i'm going to get it online. anyway i'm just curious about the sizing. when i measured my current frame it came out as 55 cm (CC) seat tube and 56 top tube. that seems to correspond nicely with debernardi's 55 which has the same two dimensions. so do you reckon i should go ahead with that frame or is there something specific to the geometry of this bike (or track frames in general) that should make me opt for the 53 (which is what various sizing charts, and other threads seem to indicate. i'm 5'9 and have a 31-32 inseam. keep in mind this bike will be used almost entirely on the road, i'm not a racer, but don't want to be riding a boat.
thanks
thanks
#3
crotchety young dude
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
From: SF, CA
Bikes: IRO Angus; Casati Gold Line; Redline 925; '72 Schwinn Olympic Paramount
Originally Posted by alexcm
check that. that peugeot i was talking about. it just got stolen. minutes ago. so now i definitely am getting a new bike.
#4
Plum Smuggler
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: NYC (Hells Kitchen)
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, EAI Bareknuckle
Originally Posted by alexcm
check that. that peugeot i was talking about. it just got stolen. minutes ago. so now i definitely am getting a new bike.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Bikes: Trek 520, Fuji Track, Vicini Road
OMG that sucks big time. The guy at my LBS just told me yesterday that one should get a track frame that is 2 sizes smaller than one normally rides. Is this total BS? I am wondering the same thing myself.
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Bikes: old peugeot coversion, de bernardi
left it locked outside my dining hall for like 15 minutes. came back. it's gone. ahh it's damned sad. it wasn't even that nice a bike, nothing too impressive. but still, i had built it up over time and it was my first fixie.
#9
Makeshift
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
The bottom bracket on a track frame is usually somewhat higher than on road frames, in order to prevent pedal strike. This can mean an increase in standover height, but IMO not enough to warrant sacrificing good riding position. Stick to the measurements that work for you and don't worry about it.
#10
King of the Hipsters
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 2
From: Bend, Oregon
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
I have the same inseam as alexcm (32") but I stand 6'2" tall.
So, I have short legs and a long body.
I ride a Bianchi Pista.
For stand over height I went one size smaller, 59cm, than I would have otherwise.
It helps that the Pista has a slightly sloping top tube.
In order to get the distance from handlebars to saddle that I needed, without putting too much weight on my front wheel, I got a setback seatpost (35mm) and I feel centered over the bike with a 90mm stem.
Too bad your bike got stolen, 'cause you could have taken measurements from the pedals to the saddle, from the saddle to the handlebars, and from the crank bearing to a vertical line directly under your saddle.
As kbjack notes, fixed gear bikes have higher bottom brackets.
How amazing that alexcm and I have the same inseam and such a difference in height.
So, I have short legs and a long body.
I ride a Bianchi Pista.
For stand over height I went one size smaller, 59cm, than I would have otherwise.
It helps that the Pista has a slightly sloping top tube.
In order to get the distance from handlebars to saddle that I needed, without putting too much weight on my front wheel, I got a setback seatpost (35mm) and I feel centered over the bike with a 90mm stem.
Too bad your bike got stolen, 'cause you could have taken measurements from the pedals to the saddle, from the saddle to the handlebars, and from the crank bearing to a vertical line directly under your saddle.
As kbjack notes, fixed gear bikes have higher bottom brackets.
How amazing that alexcm and I have the same inseam and such a difference in height.
#11
He drop me
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 13
From: Central PA
Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie
Talk about this sizing thing. My LBS was telling me to get one size LARGER. I currently ride a 54cm Specialized Roubaix and they have Langsters in both 54cm and 56cm. I thought I was golden as the 54 is an 05 and they would let it go for a song but then one of the guys I actually trust at this shop told me it would probably be too small. His reasoning was that the larger bike would get me in a better position to deal with the high cadances that you get on a fixie...more room for the thighs to not hit the chest (or belly) and more room for extra clothes (thinking of going fixie for the winter slop less main factor).
Thoughts?
Also my LBS does Giant, Specialized and Cannondale...so my picks from them are the Bowery, Langster and the Capo. The C'Dale is more than I want to spend and the word on the Bowery is that the frame looks like crap (really cheap welds even by Giant's standards)...which leave the Langster. I was also thinking IRO since they are only like 60 min down the road I can pick it up...but the cost will be like $100-$175 more than the Langster.
Thoughts?
Also my LBS does Giant, Specialized and Cannondale...so my picks from them are the Bowery, Langster and the Capo. The C'Dale is more than I want to spend and the word on the Bowery is that the frame looks like crap (really cheap welds even by Giant's standards)...which leave the Langster. I was also thinking IRO since they are only like 60 min down the road I can pick it up...but the cost will be like $100-$175 more than the Langster.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.






