'06 specialized langster - what fork?
#4
Banned.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 1
IMO, carbon forks are overrated- you won't see much of an improvement in performance for the money that you drop on one..the money would be better off spent on wheels/drivetrain or contact points (seat,pedals,handlebars/tape/grips). Carbon forks really don't give that much bling for the buck..
They are also more fragile and susceptible to damage.
They are also more fragile and susceptible to damage.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: 06' Giant Rincon, Vintage Marfiled Admiral Road Bike (SS Conversion), Bianchi Campione Del Mondo
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Don't know the general ride of the langster, but in general a carbon fork should be softening the blows from the road (potholes, cracks, etc.), while not compromising lateral stability - this definitely applies to my LeMond Filmore, and I think your bike may benefit in a similar way.
#7
moar wine!!!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: NY
Bikes: Brigdestone RB-2 : Gunnar Roadie : Masi Gran Corsa : Gunnar Crosshairs : Specialized Stumpjumper (overseas)
I just picked up a new Time 'Composite Advanced Technology" fork from the old shop for my project SS bike. I got it so cheap I could not resist.


#9
Originally Posted by BostonFixed
IMO, carbon forks are overrated- you won't see much of an improvement in performance for the money that you drop on one..the money would be better off spent on wheels/drivetrain or contact points (seat,pedals,handlebars/tape/grips). Carbon forks really don't give that much bling for the buck..
They are also more fragile and susceptible to damage.
They are also more fragile and susceptible to damage.
#12
Sheldon Brown's posse
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
From: Oz-tray-lee-ah
Bikes: BMC SL01, XtC, Rhythm GX and a frankenstein avalanche 2.0
Originally Posted by eddiebrannan
29" = 700c









