Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

new crank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-07, 01:02 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
new crank?

I have a giant bowery and i have decided to go with a smaller chain wheel ( i live in the blueridge mtns and 48t is a lill much for me) I was thinkn about something like a 35t but i dont know what cranks i need for a bike like this, as i have come from a bmx back ground. Could i use bmx cranks on this and if i do what do i need to as far as the bottum bracket. I guess i am clueless about this so any help would be great.
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:06 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A bmx, mtb or compact road crankset would work. with 35t clearence shouldn't be an issue.
Pick a crankset then a bb to match.
dutret is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:07 PM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just change the rear cog and/or buy a smaller chainring. Much cheaper and less hassle.

What is the current gearing on your bike now?
BostonFixed is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:07 PM
  #4  
dutret has a posse
 
ryand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: washington dc
Posts: 3,155

Bikes: IRO Angus 53, Marinoni Special 54, LMNO Custom Road Bike, Guerciotti TT, Late 60s Bottechia Road, Univega Via Montega beater/polo/rain bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't think anything else can really be said. Those are the two options you have. Any they will both work.
ryand is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:09 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you are running the stock 48x18 gearing, I'd reccomend you buy a 42 or 44 T chainring if you really want to gear down.
BostonFixed is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:12 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
would a 42 be a big differnce? and i am not sure if it will fit on the current crank cause of the crank arm has the spider looking thing that attaches to the chainwheel.
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:17 PM
  #7  
or tarckeemoon, depending
 
marqueemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the pesto of cities
Posts: 7,017

Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
42x18 should be plenty low for street gearing. It's probably a 130mm bolt circle crank and 42 tooth rings are readily available. So are 39 tooth rings but I think that's overkill. I don't see any reason to go down to 36x18. That's seriously low for the street - more like singlespeed MTB gearing.
marqueemoon is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:20 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for everyones help i will try out a 42 tooth and see if that helps.
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 01:23 PM
  #9  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You don't need to buy a new crank- the chainring unbolts and you can bolt your new 42t ring on.
BostonFixed is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 02:10 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Let me second Bostonfixed's first suggestion. Leave the crank and chainring alone and just get a bigger cog...much cheaper and simpler to change. A smaller change in the number of teeth on the cog will result in a more dramatic gear change than changing the same number of teeth on the chainring. I would go with a cog that has maybe two more teeth than what you have now, that will lower your gearing as much as about 6 less teeth on your chainring.

If you only change the cog, rather than changing the cranks and chainring...
1. you probably won't have to add or remove links from the chain
2. you won't have to worry about messing up your chainline
3. its cheaper
4. cog thread sizes are pretty standard. Chainring bolt circle diameter is not. Thats one less thing to worry about with a cog change.
5. The whole idea of the track cog is to change it depending on the situation. Chainrings, on the other hand are not as readily swappable.
6. Big chainrings look better than small chainrings.

Last edited by mihlbach; 01-08-07 at 02:17 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 02:31 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so if i have a 48 X 18 setup now i should either move to a 42 X 18 and have to take out links on the chain
or if i understand the correctly you suggest adding 2 more t the cog thus meaning i would need to ask for a 20t cog. Making my setup a 48X 20?
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:09 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by noremedy
so if i have a 48 X 18 setup now i should either move to a 42 X 18 and have to take out links on the chain
or if i understand the correctly you suggest adding 2 more t the cog thus meaning i would need to ask for a 20t cog. Making my setup a 48X 20?

If you move to a 42 tooth chain ring, you will have probably have to remove at least one link in the chain and possibly two. Dropping 6 teeth will move your axle back 3/4 of an inch. Removing one link from the chain will bring it forward 1/2".

On the other hand if you add two teeth to the cog you will move the axle forward only 1/4". Your present chain length and rear dropout will probably accomodate that. Look at the position of your axle right now..is there some room for it to move forward?

Your present gear (48/18) is 70.1 gear inches. Thats a pretty standard gear for urban fixed gear riding.
If you move to 48/20, you will be pedaling 63.1 gear inches...thats pretty low for road fixed gear.
42/18 will give you 61.3 gear inches...thats slightly lower but about that the same as 48/20.

You might also consider 48/19 - thats about 66.4 gear inches...sort of intermediate.

If you have the money to burn, buy a 19 and 20 tooth cog and swap between the 18-19-20 tooth cogs as needed. As you ride more and get stronger and develope better technique, you may find that 48/20 is too low. That all depends on how steep your hills are of course....

Last edited by mihlbach; 01-08-07 at 03:18 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:11 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
dabern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 334

Bikes: Rock Lobster track, Colnago Dream, Ti Paramount, Litespeed Vortex compact, Santa Cruz Blur, Bianchi cyclocross...always wanting more...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not trying to add to your confusion, but I live in Asheville NC and ride these mountains on my fixed...by "mountains" I mean the 6-9% grades, not the 15-20% ones. Right now I'm on a 45x20 and it's about right for here as long as I don't try the really steep stuff...I don't know where in the BR you live, though. Generally speaking, 3 teeth on a chainring is about equal to 1 tooth on a cog...42x18 that you're talking about would be roughly equivalent to a 48x20 but with the 48x20 you'd really have no lower to go so I'd say get the 42 tooth CR and then see how it goes...if you need lower then try a 19 or 20 cog with the 42...your results may vary, of course. Anyway, good luck!
__________________
Rock Lobster
dabern is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:18 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the 1=3 thing only works if the gear ratio is around 1:3(48/16 or 42/14 for example). At 42/18 you are much closer to one tooth in back being two up front.

one tooth in the back or front is approximately 1/8" of axle movement or half a chainlink difference. That will be more or less true for any reasonable gearing.(I was wrong and have changed this to keep people from getting confused.)

Last edited by dutret; 01-08-07 at 04:00 PM.
dutret is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:24 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dabern
Not trying to add to your confusion, but I live in Asheville NC and ride these mountains on my fixed...by "mountains" I mean the 6-9% grades, not the 15-20% ones. Right now I'm on a 45x20 and it's about right for here as long as I don't try the really steep stuff...I don't know where in the BR you live, though. Generally speaking, 3 teeth on a chainring is about equal to 1 tooth on a cog...42x18 that you're talking about would be roughly equivalent to a 48x20 but with the 48x20 you'd really have no lower to go so I'd say get the 42 tooth CR and then see how it goes...if you need lower then try a 19 or 20 cog with the 42...your results may vary, of course. Anyway, good luck!
I am In Roanoke virginia
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:26 PM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the axle is sitting almost center in the rear drop outs, I could move it up 3/4in or back a half.
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:29 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by noremedy
the axle is sitting almost center in the rear drop outs, I could move it up 3/4in or back a half.
Great...that give you several options. BTW, you can get cogs up to at least 22 teeth.

here are some examples...
https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/fixed-sprockets.html
mihlbach is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:42 PM
  #18  
Paste Taster
 
Retem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,392

Bikes: , Jury Bike, Moto Outcast 29, Spicer standard track frame and spicer custom steel sprint frame.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you get a new chainring and cog it shouldn't be more than 45 bones
Retem is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:50 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by dutret
one tooth in the back or front is approximately 1/4" of axle movement or half a chainlink difference. That will be more or less true for any reasonable gearing.
You should think this through more carefully...its more like 1/8" per tooth. I recently went from 42/15 to 45/16. I added a total of 4 teeth and I added 1 chain link and got the exact same axle position. Adding 4 teeth = 1 link = 1/2" axle movement. Therefore, adding 1 tooth = 1/8" of axle movement. Sheldon says the same somewhere on his site. The reason it only move 1/8" per tooth change, and not 1/4" is because the chain only goes roughly around half of each sprocket. Adding 1 tooth = 1/2" greater sprocket diameter. The chain only goes around about half of that, which means there is only 1/4" more contact of the chain and sprocket. Effectively that makes your chain 1/4" shorter. The chain runs both above and below the sprockets, so shortening the chain by a total of 1/4" only moves the axle 1/8".

Last edited by mihlbach; 01-08-07 at 04:04 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:55 PM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the link i ordered
i ordered the 20th phil wood
and the sugino 42t chain ring the one for the 130mm
I ll add the cog first and go from there and again thanks for all the help
noremedy is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 03:59 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mihlbach
You should think this through more carefully...its more like 1/8" per tooth. I recently went from 42/15 to 45/16. I added a total of 4 teeth and I added 1 chain link and got the exact same axle position. Adding 4 teeth = 1 link = 1/2" axle movement. Therefore, adding or removing 1 tooth = 1/8' of axle movement. Sheldon says the same somewhere on his site. The reason its 1/8" and not 1/4" is because the chain only goes roughly around half the cog and chaing ring...the other half doesn't effect the position of the axle. Adding 1 tooth = 1/2 greater sprocket diameter. Chain only goes around about half of that, which means their is only 1/4" more contact of the chain and sprocket. Now divide that in half for the top and bottom portions of the chain and you only get 1/8" axle movement.
Indeed you are right. It's been a while since I've had to worry about that and I got confused.
dutret is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 05:14 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
mihlbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,644
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by noremedy
Thanks for the link i ordered
i ordered the 20th phil wood
and the sugino 42t chain ring the one for the 130mm
I ll add the cog first and go from there and again thanks for all the help
Good luck!

I shoulda mentioned this...but you need to know whether your drive chain is 1/8" or 3/32"...that describes the width of the chain and the thickness of the cog and chainwheel. The link I provided you was for 3/32" cogs. That width will work with either a 1/8" or 3/32" chain...so you should be fine if you ordered from the page that I linked. But just for future reference, singlespeed/fixed gear chains and cogs come in two widths. 1/8" sprockets (thicker) will only work with a 1/8" chain. 3/32" sprockets (narrower) will work with either type of chain.

Last edited by mihlbach; 01-08-07 at 05:20 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Old 01-08-07, 05:34 PM
  #23  
Paste Taster
 
Retem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4,392

Bikes: , Jury Bike, Moto Outcast 29, Spicer standard track frame and spicer custom steel sprint frame.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mihlbach
Good luck!

I shoulda mentioned this...but you need to know whether your drive chain is 1/8" or 3/32"...that describes the width of the chain and the thickness of the cog and chainwheel. The link I provided you was for 3/32" cogs. That width will work with either a 1/8" or 3/32" chain...so you should be fine if you ordered from the page that I linked. But just for future reference, singlespeed/fixed gear chains and cogs come in two widths. 1/8" sprockets (thicker) will only work with a 1/8" chain. 3/32" sprockets (narrower) will work with either type of chain.

just get an 1/8" chain kmc z chain is usually 6 bucks
Retem is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.