Swapping cogs vs swapping chainrings
#1
Thread Starter
Blue Light Special
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
Swapping cogs vs swapping chainrings
I have a fixed-free Formula hub so if I want to change the gearing by changing cogs it's this whole ordeal to get the lockring and cog off (I would imagine. I have not done this yet..) Plus DA cogs are not cheap ($26). It seems like a much easier proposition to swap chainrings instead. It's quick and easy to get chainring bolts off and chainrings can be had for cheap.
Just in case though, I thought I would ask: Is there anything wrong with swapping chainrings instead of cogs?
Just in case though, I thought I would ask: Is there anything wrong with swapping chainrings instead of cogs?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: portland, or
Bikes: Bridgestone Grand Velo Track
I've been kind of going through this dillema myself. I think it's actually cheaper to swap cogs. you'd be hard pressed to fine a $26 track chainring. that is, unless you're using a 3/32" chain in which case you probably have a bunch of chainrings lying around already.
If you have a lockring tool then it's a piece of cake to change your cog. you can just do a reverse rotafixa to get it off. or if you're chummy with your LBS just make them do it for you (or show you how).
If you have a lockring tool then it's a piece of cake to change your cog. you can just do a reverse rotafixa to get it off. or if you're chummy with your LBS just make them do it for you (or show you how).
#6
Thread Starter
Blue Light Special
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
I'd be going from 42x16 to 46x16. The chain and cog are 3/32" so I was thinking of getting one of these.
Edit: Also I can't really go down to a 15t cog since that is not enough, and a 14t cog is too much. 46 seems like the sweespot since it is halfway between 42 and 53 (which I both have) so with only one chainring purchase I have all the gearing I will want to play with for a long time, all without buying new cogs.
Edit: Also I can't really go down to a 15t cog since that is not enough, and a 14t cog is too much. 46 seems like the sweespot since it is halfway between 42 and 53 (which I both have) so with only one chainring purchase I have all the gearing I will want to play with for a long time, all without buying new cogs.
#8
i ride a bicycle
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by barba
Good quality cogs are much cheaper than quality rings.
Chainring: Stamp out of plate
Cog: forge (?) and cut threads
Mac
#9
I pedal what I ride
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
I would suggest that you actually try both methods. Keep in mind that to change a chainring and make sure that the chainring bolts are on tight enough you need to remove the crank as well. To me it seems like too much additional effort (to change the chainring) to gain an additional 2 gear inches
#10
Thread Starter
Blue Light Special
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, Sunny Cali
Bikes: '05 Felt F55, Schwinn Prologue road bike, '86 Centurion DS Iron Man, Sette Flite AM MTB
42x16 -> 46x16 is a gain of ~6.7 gear inches, not 2 (says https://www.panix.com/~jbarrm/cycal/cycal.30f.html)
I don't see the need to remove the crank to get the bolts on tight.
Anyways, I bit the bullet and bought a 46 ring. Thanks for the advice.
I don't see the need to remove the crank to get the bolts on tight.
Anyways, I bit the bullet and bought a 46 ring. Thanks for the advice.
#12
Since we are on the topic and I don't see the need to start another thread...
1) I'm after a 130bcd,48t,3/32", chainring in silver (high shine/polished) that has cutouts in it. I know I can get a Salsa or Surly, but those are solid (without cutouts). Point me towards one if you know of one.
2) I'm after a 3/32", 17t, silver cog. Does EAI make one in this size in silver? I know they make black. I know I can get a Phil Wood, Shimano DA, Surly or others in this size and tooth count and color.
Thanks for the leads.
1) I'm after a 130bcd,48t,3/32", chainring in silver (high shine/polished) that has cutouts in it. I know I can get a Salsa or Surly, but those are solid (without cutouts). Point me towards one if you know of one.
2) I'm after a 3/32", 17t, silver cog. Does EAI make one in this size in silver? I know they make black. I know I can get a Phil Wood, Shimano DA, Surly or others in this size and tooth count and color.
Thanks for the leads.
#14
a quality cog is cheaper than a quality chainring, but the bad possibilities of using a less-than-quality chainring are way less than the bad possibilities of using a cheap cog. pretty much the worst you're dealing with when it comes to cheaper chainrings is a little bit out of roundness, which is fine for many people. a bad cog on the other hand will chew up your threads.
anyway, sac02, manufacturing a chainring is a little bit more complex than stamping out a plate, especially for the high end stuff that costs more than your house. maybe 11.4 will weigh in?
anyway, sac02, manufacturing a chainring is a little bit more complex than stamping out a plate, especially for the high end stuff that costs more than your house. maybe 11.4 will weigh in?
#18
asleep at the wheel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Bikes: Custom Richie Ditta Track Bike, Eddie Merckx Corsa, Marioni Custom Pista, Dolan Cyclocross
Originally Posted by nayr497
Since we are on the topic and I don't see the need to start another thread...
1) I'm after a 130bcd,48t,3/32", chainring in silver (high shine/polished) that has cutouts in it.
1) I'm after a 130bcd,48t,3/32", chainring in silver (high shine/polished) that has cutouts in it.
Originally Posted by nayr497
2) I'm after a 3/32", 17t, silver cog. Does EAI make one in this size in silver?





