Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Explain to me, gear inches

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Explain to me, gear inches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-07 | 01:55 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Traffic shark
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
From: California

Bikes: 2 fixies, 1 road, 29er in the works.

A really stupid thread, it would seem.

I'm the last man out of the cave.

Last edited by SD Fixed; 03-22-07 at 11:15 PM.
SD Fixed is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 01:58 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,317
Likes: 0
From: GA
Because tires and wheels are different sizes so simple ratio doesn't provide as much information. Some would argue that gear inches don't provide enough information either.
dutret is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:00 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,402
Likes: 501
From: under bridge in cardboard box
makes it easier to compare bikes with different sized wheels without having to do very much math
pedex is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:02 PM
  #4  
nothing but a gnab gib
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Rock City

Bikes: The Heart of Gold starship bicycle

it's another way for people to be vague.
moe sizlack is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:03 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Traffic shark
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
From: California

Bikes: 2 fixies, 1 road, 29er in the works.

Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.

right, I think you are.
SD Fixed is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:26 PM
  #6  
Oh god it hurts!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
why do thermometers have numbers on them?
j-lie is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:42 PM
  #7  
current member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Cph

Bikes: some- variety is good..

How else to make a schematic comparison of ,say 44x17 and 50x19. Which is bigger? How would you measure if not in distance travelled?
cphfxt is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:44 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,317
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by cphfxt
How else to make a schematic comparison of ,say 44x17 and 50x19. Which is bigger? How would you measure if not in distance travelled?

well if the wheel size is the same it's easy
2.58 vs 2.63
dutret is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
squeakywheel's Avatar
domestique
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 1
From: off the back
Originally Posted by William Karsten
Perhaps I'm getting old an onerous, like 165.

But really, why do gear inches matter to people? I can't for the life of me understand why it @#$@# matters. It seems people obsess over it. I started 42x16. It got easy. I bumped up once to 44x16. Things weren't hard. I built some stamina, some speed, got comfy and went 48x15. Which seems plenty. How would gear inches play into this? It seems to me that it really superflous information.

Or, I'm the last man out of the cave.
Other people obsess over it? Seems you're the one changing your gearing all the time.
squeakywheel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:46 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Likes: 133
Its a way of expressing how easy or hard a gear is. Since there are many equivalent gears, for example a 51/17 is exactly the same as a 48/16, its easier to talk about gear inches, which is the number of inches the bike travels with one revolution of the pedals, than it is to talk about specific CR/cog combinations.

In general, a 70 inch gear is a pretty easy around town gear for the flats. The 42/16 gear you started with is about 70 inches. Track racers usually ride something in the 88-92 inch range. Your 48/15 is about 86 inches, so you are getting up there with the track racers.

Easy to calculate, Cr teeth divided by cog teeth times 27 gives you gear inches.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:46 PM
  #11  
Dogbait's Avatar
lunatic fringe
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 1
From: Miles from Nowhere, Columbia County, OR

Bikes: 1980 Schwinn World Sport, 1982 Schwinn Super Le Tour, 1984 (?) Univega Single Speed/Fixed conversion, Kogswell G58 fixed gear, 1987 Schwinn Super Sport

Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
Dogbait is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:49 PM
  #12  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by William Karsten
I started 42x16. It got easy. I bumped up once to 44x16. Things weren't hard. I built some stamina, some speed, got comfy and went 48x15.
All this means nothing without tyre/wheel size factored in. hence gear inches.

and some will say that gear inches is useless without taking crank length into account. hence sheldon's gain ratios.
goldener is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:49 PM
  #13  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
you=wrong.
goldener is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:49 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,317
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
That's not exactly how gear inches work and it is still vague compared to gain.
dutret is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:50 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,402
Likes: 501
From: under bridge in cardboard box
except gear inches doesnt equal distance traveled per crank revolution

circumference= Pi * diameter

gear inches = gear ratio * wheel diameter

actual distance traveled per crank revolution is gear ratio times circumference
pedex is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:52 PM
  #16  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
a 72 inche gear is equivalent to riding a highweel bike with a 72" front wheel.
goldener is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:54 PM
  #17  
onetwentyeight's Avatar
blah
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,573
Likes: 6
From: Oakland, CA
read this: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gain.html
onetwentyeight is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 02:54 PM
  #18  
nothing but a gnab gib
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Rock City

Bikes: The Heart of Gold starship bicycle

Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
oh sorry, was i being vague?
moe sizlack is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 03:06 PM
  #19  
Aeroplane's Avatar
jack of one or two trades
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CT

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Originally Posted by William Karsten
But really, why do gear inches matter to people?
One valid reason I can think of is going between offroad 26" and 29" wheeled bikes. In order to keep your gearing consistent, you figure out the gear inches and keep that the same.

I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
Aeroplane is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 03:15 PM
  #20  
bonechilling's Avatar
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.
Totally OT, but you know that you spelled "Szyslak" wrong,
right?
bonechilling is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 03:53 PM
  #21  
dobber's Avatar
Perineal Pressurized
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 2
From: In Ebritated
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Totally OT, but you know that you spelled "Szyslak" wrong,
right?
You're both wrong



Sleestaks
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
dobber is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 04:02 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
One valid reason I can think of is going between offroad 26" and 29" wheeled bikes. In order to keep your gearing consistent, you figure out the gear inches and keep that the same.

I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
But people do go between different tires often enough. When it snows I put a 32C xcross tire on my rear wheel, which increases the gear inches of my bike.
Yoshi is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 04:10 PM
  #23  
roadfix's Avatar
hello
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,710
Likes: 136
From: Los Angeles
I need at least 80 inches to stay with my Sat morning geared group ride.
roadfix is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 04:18 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Since there are many equivalent gears, for example a 51/17 is exactly the same as a 48/16,
while we're on the topic:

can someone sum up the advantage/disadvantage (if any) of 2 different combinations that have the same gear inches?
Aves is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-07 | 04:47 PM
  #25  
jim-bob's Avatar
hateful little monkey
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,274
Likes: 0
From: oakland, ca
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
Ahem.
jim-bob is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.