Explain to me, gear inches
#1
Traffic shark
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California
Posts: 4,612
Bikes: 2 fixies, 1 road, 29er in the works.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A really stupid thread, it would seem.
I'm the last man out of the cave.
Last edited by SD Fixed; 03-22-07 at 11:15 PM.
#2
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because tires and wheels are different sizes so simple ratio doesn't provide as much information. Some would argue that gear inches don't provide enough information either.
#3
Banned
makes it easier to compare bikes with different sized wheels without having to do very much math
#5
Traffic shark
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: California
Posts: 4,612
Bikes: 2 fixies, 1 road, 29er in the works.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.
right, I think you are.
#7
current member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cph
Posts: 414
Bikes: some- variety is good..
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How else to make a schematic comparison of ,say 44x17 and 50x19. Which is bigger? How would you measure if not in distance travelled?
#8
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cphfxt
How else to make a schematic comparison of ,say 44x17 and 50x19. Which is bigger? How would you measure if not in distance travelled?
well if the wheel size is the same it's easy
2.58 vs 2.63
#9
domestique
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: off the back
Posts: 2,005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by William Karsten
Perhaps I'm getting old an onerous, like 165.
But really, why do gear inches matter to people? I can't for the life of me understand why it @#$@# matters. It seems people obsess over it. I started 42x16. It got easy. I bumped up once to 44x16. Things weren't hard. I built some stamina, some speed, got comfy and went 48x15. Which seems plenty. How would gear inches play into this? It seems to me that it really superflous information.
Or, I'm the last man out of the cave.
But really, why do gear inches matter to people? I can't for the life of me understand why it @#$@# matters. It seems people obsess over it. I started 42x16. It got easy. I bumped up once to 44x16. Things weren't hard. I built some stamina, some speed, got comfy and went 48x15. Which seems plenty. How would gear inches play into this? It seems to me that it really superflous information.
Or, I'm the last man out of the cave.
#10
Senior Member
Its a way of expressing how easy or hard a gear is. Since there are many equivalent gears, for example a 51/17 is exactly the same as a 48/16, its easier to talk about gear inches, which is the number of inches the bike travels with one revolution of the pedals, than it is to talk about specific CR/cog combinations.
In general, a 70 inch gear is a pretty easy around town gear for the flats. The 42/16 gear you started with is about 70 inches. Track racers usually ride something in the 88-92 inch range. Your 48/15 is about 86 inches, so you are getting up there with the track racers.
Easy to calculate, Cr teeth divided by cog teeth times 27 gives you gear inches.
In general, a 70 inch gear is a pretty easy around town gear for the flats. The 42/16 gear you started with is about 70 inches. Track racers usually ride something in the 88-92 inch range. Your 48/15 is about 86 inches, so you are getting up there with the track racers.
Easy to calculate, Cr teeth divided by cog teeth times 27 gives you gear inches.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#11
lunatic fringe
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miles from Nowhere, Columbia County, OR
Posts: 1,111
Bikes: 1980 Schwinn World Sport, 1982 Schwinn Super Le Tour, 1984 (?) Univega Single Speed/Fixed conversion, Kogswell G58 fixed gear, 1987 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by William Karsten
I started 42x16. It got easy. I bumped up once to 44x16. Things weren't hard. I built some stamina, some speed, got comfy and went 48x15.
and some will say that gear inches is useless without taking crank length into account. hence sheldon's gain ratios.
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
#14
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
#15
Banned
except gear inches doesnt equal distance traveled per crank revolution
circumference= Pi * diameter
gear inches = gear ratio * wheel diameter
actual distance traveled per crank revolution is gear ratio times circumference
circumference= Pi * diameter
gear inches = gear ratio * wheel diameter
actual distance traveled per crank revolution is gear ratio times circumference
#17
blah
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 5,573
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
read this: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gain.html
#18
nothing but a gnab gib
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Rock City
Posts: 222
Bikes: The Heart of Gold starship bicycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dogbait
There's nothing vague about a system that measures exactly how far down the road your particular set-up will carry your butt for each turn of the crank.
#19
jack of one or two trades
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by William Karsten
But really, why do gear inches matter to people?
I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
#20
Run What 'Ya Brung
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by moe sizlack
it's another way for people to be vague.
right?
#21
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Totally OT, but you know that you spelled "Szyslak" wrong,
right?
right?
Sleestaks
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
One valid reason I can think of is going between offroad 26" and 29" wheeled bikes. In order to keep your gearing consistent, you figure out the gear inches and keep that the same.
I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 698
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
Since there are many equivalent gears, for example a 51/17 is exactly the same as a 48/16,
can someone sum up the advantage/disadvantage (if any) of 2 different combinations that have the same gear inches?
#25
hateful little monkey
Join Date: May 2003
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 5,274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
I agree with you for on-road stuff though, not many folks go between 650c, 650B, and 700c at all.