are you being serious?

I don't know.. but should you start shaving??

4:20 duuuuude!

yes. the silly frame sizes and fit choices in this forum are just that: silly.

But what if i have spent time on smaller and larger sizes and happen to find the smaller sizes more comfortable, and like the handling and the look, thus making more likely to ride. is it still silly?

yes... everywhere.

to be honest- i don't know.. but the range from a 54-58cm bike is huge... thats like roughly a 6-8" differentce in body height..

What ever happened to personal preference? Different strokes for different folks? ect, ect?

I was about to make some crack about shoe sizes being like bike sizes and proper shoe size being unrelated to preference. Then I remembered last year's bike was a 54 cm, and this year's is a 63 cm. So yeah.
Which is to say if you prefer to cram size 12 feet into size 7 shoes, go hog wild, man.

699! pshhhhhhhh i got one of those for 300! hahah get it.

man blue?? i wouldnt get it red bikes are alot faster. Does it have risers? Is the front wheel radially laced?

yes infact

the thread should have died at this point.............

Bikes?

C'mon, people, you can get the exact same position on a 54 and a 58, bars and saddle relative to each other and the BB down to a mm, quite easily as well.
They may handle differently, but one is not necessarily worse than the other.

You guys ride track bikes on the street, often brakeless, so pls stfu about bike fit.

As to the question, WHERE THE HELL ARE THE PICTURES???
:)

Agreed. Pictars nowz!