![]() |
when 10 people on bikes surround a car with people in it, the people in the car are going to get a bit freaked out and do something stupid
|
if you left the part about bikes out, it would be more socially relevent.
i don't think the reprecussions would be as blown out if a motorist drove into a parade route, and people in the parade swarmed the car. In fact, the motorist would be arrested, and everyone would say, "what kind of idiot drives into a parade?" |
Originally Posted by willypilgrim
them being old confused and scared isn't a saving grace for them, if anything they are more at fault in my eyes.
I'm frequently dodging cars driving by old people who are rushing off somewhere to die. And i'm speaking from the viewpoint of pedestrian, bicyclist, and motorist. |
Is critical mass an act of subtle mob aggression at heart, similar to the orangemen parade in Ireland? When I did it i certainly enjoyed sticking it to the car drivers with imputiny. It's fun but I think it may not be for me anymore.
|
Originally Posted by Retem
old scared and confused yes but running over four bicycles as people dismount them and run in fear is another thing
|
Originally Posted by doofo
six thats what happens when you play eye of the tiger for a mob it's true... |
maybe i should go on a CM sometime and bring a ghettoblaster to play bodycount
|
The Winner Loses?
|
Originally Posted by griffin_
when 10 people on bikes surround a car with people in it, the people in the car are going to get a bit freaked out and do something stupid
True. Seen it happen many times. I tend to lean towards leaving adults with kids out of things. |
Originally Posted by willypilgrim
if you left the part about bikes out, it would be more socially relevent.
i don't think the reprecussions would be as blown out if a motorist drove into a parade route, and people in the parade swarmed the car. In fact, the motorist would be arrested, and everyone would say, "what kind of idiot drives into a parade?" Do you people in the US drive into parades??? It's a simple yes/no question. If the answer is, as I expect, NO, then it's clear these people in the van had no moral justification to crumple 4 bikes (and potentially, the cyclists they belonged to). And EVEN IN THE CASE OF UNAUTHORIZED PARADES, it's a crime and clearly morally wrong to drive over people in a parade! So knock down that argument already. EDIT: I would even suggestthat CM should be modified so that cyclists actually WALK with their bikes, see if THAT is going to make the motorists happier. See how "quickly" that is going to go down. I bet at the end of it, motorists will be WISHING for the cyclists to ride! |
Originally Posted by mander
Video http://bclu.org/20070511/
I like how the guy has his crying kids right in the thick of the confrontation, and all the way through. If I didn't know that cars are bad and critical massers are never immoral hippie d-bags I would say he is exploiting their presence for the cameras. Thanks Dad! but that guy with the kids was definitely grandstanding. lame. |
those old foggies should have to pay for the kids therapy
and mine too |
having seen first hand how quickly an old persons mental and physical state can diminish(from watching my grandparents), they should be retested at minimum every six months to have the right to drive.
Granted, most people that drive are idiots. I've almost been hit hundreds of times while driving or while riding by idiots, and that's the way it goes. But seriously, old people are notoriously bad drivers. Also, it seems that the insurance companies standpoint of having higher premiums for males than females should be reinvestigated thoroughly, as (to sound like a terrible misogynist) i know i'm a better driver than most females of my age bracket are (which I would mostly attribute to cellular phone use, and as we are speaking in that instince of gender roles, a female is more likely to have a prolonged phone conversation whilst driving than a male, which I would mandate would equal the former belief that a male is more likely to be involved in an accident.) regardless, those are arguments for a different day, and I'm glad at least someone got my point on the parade issue. |
i believe the stats indicating males are involved in and cause more serious accidents
it could be a vast feminists conspiracy though young drivers should receive tests every 6 months too they suck |
agreed
|
Originally Posted by neasrhinolds
Not to beat a dead horse. But I saw the whole "Critial Smash" minivan scenario go down. The woman knew she hit the cyclist - she hit her brakes before she hit the gas. The cops on the scene wouldn't let the cyclist press "hit and run" charges unless he took an ambulance ride. He said "F-that, that's bullsh*t" and rode off. You can read my account here: www.urbandelicious.com .
FYI - Matier and Ross are working on another 1 sided Critical Mass story about a limo driver. There's a political slant to this whole thing: The decision on healthy Saturdays in GGP takes place April 9 which Matier opposes and is trying to push anti-bike sentiment. Otherwise none of these stories would had even made the news. |
Originally Posted by doofo
i believe the stats indicating males are involved in and cause more serious accidents
it could be a vast feminists conspiracy though young drivers should receive tests every 6 months too they suck |
Originally Posted by Morgie
social expectations also put males behind the wheel more often, girls 16-24 drive far fewer miles and therefore make up for fewer crashes...
like why CM is taking the heat for this--the attack didn't take place during the ride--see my post above. Now CM is under suspicion. My buddy who lives in SF said at the next ride there were choppers buzzing the whole event--waaay too much drama. I went to engage in a peaceful and fun event that asserts the rights of cyclists to the road and to enjoy camaraderie. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.