Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   critical mass attack? (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/285042-critical-mass-attack.html)

JaredG 04-07-07 04:23 PM


Originally Posted by schnee
This is CM. Too many 'anarchists for anarchy's sake'.


The statement of the thread. This proves how LAME Critical Mass really is now. What is supposed to help a cause is just being F@ck'd up by a bunch of inconsiderate, hypocritical holier than thou nonsense.

Group Anarchy? Sounds good, I'll bring the beer!

Retem 04-07-07 04:31 PM

group anarchy isn't anarchy

DannyRocks 04-07-07 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by doofo
guys she only tapped a cyclists wheel!


that statement goes to show how little the police and the authors of the original article know about riding bikes on the street

how many of you have had a car "tap your wheel" and not been thrown
?

tapping cyclists is what sends them under trucks buses and other cars
:(

Re: tapping wheels
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=284717

wroomwroomoops 04-07-07 05:14 PM

Very biased article. You can clearly see this from the overall perspective the story was told from: the perspective of the car driver.

And then, take this quote:


According to police, Ferrando had allegedly tapped one of the cyclists' tires.

When the alleged bicycle victim was approached, however, he said he wasn't hurt. He also refused to give his name or any other information.
What does "however" imply? That nothing happened to the victim, or that, in spite of what happened, he/she wasn't hurt? The reporter would like to make it sound as if the event didn't happen - but the truth is, it might have. The car might have, indeed, tapped the bike, and the cyclist could have fallen, as witnesses (not mentioned in this article, of course) mentioned.

LeMans 04-07-07 05:36 PM


Originally Posted by Rusty Valiant
I think the key part to this equation is not the politics or the road rage, but the psychology of a crowd. CM is a crowd and behaves differently that an assembly of individuals.
A little outdated, but Gustav le Bon had some interesting things to say about it.

(sorry about the nerdery, I'm doing schoolwork)

EXACTLY. The mentality becomes that of a collective and you feel you won't be held accountable for your singular actions as part of the collective. Its why CM is ironic.

Ride your bikes as much as you want, boys and girls. Play by the rules of the road and don't worry so much about being a marketing tool to get the whole world to ride bikes. Because if the day comes that a good percentage of the world rides bikes instead of vehicles, it will have absolutely nothing to do with your silly little group rides. It will be based on individual economic necessity.

LeMans 04-07-07 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by mander
The report I read said her husband was in the van. I suspect that he's not in the photo because that would make the story less inflammatory.

Very plausible scenario.

Someone needs to turn this lady onto the Clydesdale forum.

wroomwroomoops 04-07-07 05:41 PM


Originally Posted by bbattle

If I could only see the next 2 seconds of that action :D That poor bastard got properly "tired" in the crotch...

Sekt 04-07-07 08:14 PM


Originally Posted by Retem
group anarchy isn't anarchy

Anarchism as a movement isn't about chaos. It's about the removal of power structures and the development of co-operative communities. I'm not sure how many self-proclaimed 'anarchists' (or kids with circle-A patches) actually realise that.

roadgator 04-08-07 12:04 AM


Originally Posted by LeMans
Because if the day comes that a good percentage of the world rides bikes instead of vehicles, it will have absolutely nothing to do with your silly little group rides. It will be based on individual economic necessity.

yup, as long as the majority can afford to drive cars, bikes will be second class citizens on the road.

get used to it now before you get run over. physics will never be on your side, even if cars become more courteous.

Retem 04-08-07 02:56 AM


Originally Posted by Sekt
Anarchism as a movement isn't about chaos. It's about the removal of power structures and the development of co-operative communities. I'm not sure how many self-proclaimed 'anarchists' (or kids with circle-A patches) actually realise that.

dude you just described communism

shogun17 04-08-07 03:31 AM

**** like this never happens in Western Australia. There aren't enough cyclists to start a critical mass, let alone enough to actually mob a car.

brokenrobot 04-08-07 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by Retem
dude you just described communism

I do not think that word means what you think it means.

oldsprinter 04-08-07 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
If I could only see the next 2 seconds of that action :D That poor bastard got properly "tired" in the crotch...

Another blow for Iranian/Russian relations.

I bet he wasn't holding his head a bit later.

Retem 04-08-07 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by brokenrobot
I do not think that word means what you think it means.

Oh I don't know the whole cooperative community thing sound awfully communist to me in the truest sense of the word

You know a true marxist communist system. communism as we westerners know it is really a totalitarian system with a dictator that often times takes advantage of the false sense of communism to placate ones own agenda, for the people!

wroomwroomoops 04-18-07 09:54 AM


Originally Posted by oldsprinter
I bet he wasn't holding his head a bit later.

Then again, maybe he was. Double entendre warning.


So, anyway... critical mass in Helsinki? I bet there would be at least 3 guys showing up :D :) :(

dblock 04-18-07 10:11 AM

"A biker to my right made a 90-degree turn into the van. I didn't hit him," she said. "He so very intentionally biked into me."

from the CBS article. pretty articulate, did she put that on the police report?

thatcher 04-18-07 10:52 AM

to find the IQ of a mob you devide the IQ of the dumbest person in the group by the number of people in the group.

but really from that video i can say that i dont like that woman at all. she reminds me from the pta mom in donny darko

Shiznaz 04-18-07 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by JaredG
The statement of the thread. This proves how LAME Critical Mass really is now. What is supposed to help a cause is just being F@ck'd up by a bunch of inconsiderate, hypocritical holier than thou nonsense.

Group Anarchy? Sounds good, I'll bring the beer!

Yeah, 'proves' :rolleyes:

Regardless of any of the context and what is right or wrong, I find the media bias to be shocking. Nothing new though. That Ferrando woman seems like a slimey character.

h_curtis 04-18-07 11:55 AM

I really don't know what the big deal is? The lady got what she deserved. Personally we should all go out and buy guns and protect ourselves from people like this. Just run down to the K-mart and grab a pistol and there you go. I mean what does anyone really expect? This is the US of A. We kick butt and that is the way it is. It is our way. So you folks in the CM's, don't take any crap man. Just ride and not care. It is our way. The rest of the world watch out. You may be next. Yeeeeeehaaaaaawwww. We need Jeb in next. Let's roll!

willypilgrim 04-18-07 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by Retem
Oh I don't know the whole cooperative community thing sound awfully communist to me in the truest sense of the word

You know a true marxist communist system. communism as we westerners know it is really a totalitarian system with a dictator that often times takes advantage of the false sense of communism to placate ones own agenda, for the people!

Since you're talking about "we westerners", and then you describe it as truly a totalitarian system with a dictator, that proves that you know nothing of which you speak.

thebankman 04-18-07 01:58 PM

A few choices words about the Critical Mass episode today in the local SF rag:

http://www.examiner.com/a-680357~Let..._18__2007.html

Retem 04-18-07 01:58 PM


Originally Posted by willypilgrim
Since you're talking about "we westerners", and then you describe it as truly a totalitarian system with a dictator, that proves that you know nothing of which you speak.

what the hell are you refering to??
I stated that the western view of a communist systems is skewd because of the fact that the "communist systems" in question are more like totalitarian system in reality.
Go read some marx and stfu.

Shiznaz 04-18-07 02:11 PM


Originally Posted by Retem
Go read some marx and stfu.

Yeah, quit Stalin and show us your Marx

Retem 04-18-07 02:21 PM

good one shiznaz ya know the whole commy thing should be moved to the politics thread anyway

BuddyMike 04-18-07 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by Shiznaz
Yeah, quit Stalin and show us your Marx

I loved that family guy episode.

willypilgrim 04-18-07 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by Retem
what the hell are you refering to??
I stated that the western view of a communist systems is skewd because of the fact that the "communist systems" in question are more like totalitarian system in reality.
Go read some marx and stfu.


Go read some marx? You mean like, Capital, On the Jewish Question, The German Ideaology, or should I go on? I'm quite familiar with marx, and could be called either a marxist or a trot depending on how you wanted to look at things.

This conversation doesn't have to continue here, as it's out of place, but your statement lends itself to you agreeing with the naive (western) assumption of the totalitarian nature of any communist society (of which, regardless, the world has never seen)\\

schnee 04-18-07 06:04 PM


of which, regardless, the world has never seen
Don't worry, it's 'inevitable', any day now the futility of capitalism will be realized and the workers will rise up to their rightful place

(Yes, being sarcastic)

Retem 04-18-07 06:08 PM


Originally Posted by willypilgrim
Go read some marx? You mean like, Capital, On the Jewish Question, The German Ideaology, or should I go on? I'm quite familiar with marx, and could be called either a marxist or a trot depending on how you wanted to look at things.

This conversation doesn't have to continue here, as it's out of place, but your statement lends itself to you agreeing with the naive (western) assumption of the totalitarian nature of any communist society (of which, regardless, the world has never seen)\\

you are correc that this is out of place but let me clarify myself I was arguing that the description given on a prior page of the "anarchist movement" in itself was a description of utopian communism I am sorry if I am a confusing person my communication skills are not the great thank you

and thank you for the refreshing bit f intelligence when it comes to these matters often opinions are souly based on popular beleif or popular reading once again excuse my trespass and thanks

Fugazi Dave 04-18-07 10:41 PM

I'm only posting because I just read through eight pages of the same **** I've read twenty times before. In short, people suck on both sides of the equation and none of this is going to get any better before we lose the victim mentality, this sense of entitlement overlaid with hollywood drama, and everyone takes on some personal ****ing responsibility.

EyeRobot 04-18-07 10:48 PM

http://www.evcforum.net/Images/Avatars/00001907.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.