Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Touring bike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-07 | 10:56 AM
  #26  
dustinlikewhat's Avatar
Bow$$
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
From: Bodymore, Murderland

Bikes: Surly Instigator '02, Schwinn Traveler fixed conversion, '02 Fuji Track

I don't do touring, so I've always wondered, how often do you make use of the extra spokes that you would have in the holders?
dustinlikewhat is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:56 AM
  #27  
Bye Bye
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 2
From: Gone gone gone
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
I'm also interested in the heel strike issue. I am taking my Soma Doublecross on tour and it has the same chainstay length as the IRO cross and surly cross. I'm wondering whether I will have to buy expensive Tubus racks because they can mount the panniers really far back, or whether I can go with a cheaper, more available rack...

edit: rider-x, are those the 28L arkel mountain bags? What kind of rack?
I mounted a Tubus Fly to my LeMond last year for some geared brevets. Used small panniers and had room for more. I would have cleared my heels without any problems, but to give me a bit more room I made some small aluminum extensions that pushed the rack further back. Took an hour using some hardware store parts.

Tubus Racks are wonderful. I've looked at several and settled on the Fly for my needs.

Personally I'd go XC - I had a dedicated tourer (a Trek 520) that I recently sold as I never really got into it. The CC gives you lots of options for rigging the bike, gears or no, racks, fenders, wide tires. I love mine. Currently running it FG, and I have thought about lite touring on it with my Carradice saddlebag and a handlebar bag.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:58 AM
  #28  
Bye Bye
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 2
From: Gone gone gone
Originally Posted by dutret
braze ons work much much better since they are closer to the brake and stiffer. The lack of one is my main complaint with my crosscheck.

The crosscheck is also missing the spoke holder and the fork rack braze ons of the LHT.

I also have tiny feet so heel strike isn't a problem.
Extra spokes - get a cork, tuck them and other stuff you may never use into your seat post before putting it into the frame. (assuming there's enough room for them)

It is missing the lowriders up front - but this can be overcome with Old Man Mountain or Tubus racks.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 11:13 AM
  #29  
riderx's Avatar
BFSSFG old timer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 1
From: Fredrock
Originally Posted by dustinlikewhat
I don't do touring, so I've always wondered, how often do you make use of the extra spokes that you would have in the holders?
You are generally carrying a lot of extra weight that also happens to be centered around your wheels. It's a lot more common to break spokes under these conditions.

That said, not have a purpose built place on the frame to store spokes is a minor issue. A nice touch on a touring specific frame, but if you don't have it you just stuff them in your panniers or tape them to your frame.
riderx is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 11:57 AM
  #30  
dustinlikewhat's Avatar
Bow$$
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
From: Bodymore, Murderland

Bikes: Surly Instigator '02, Schwinn Traveler fixed conversion, '02 Fuji Track

ahh gotcha. for a while I thought it was some sort of show-offy thing, like "I tour so much I need lots of extra spokes"
dustinlikewhat is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 12:02 PM
  #31  
disco2000's Avatar
...
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Philly, PA
wait, you're touring fixed?
disco2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 05:11 PM
  #32  
Thighmaster
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by riderx
That said, not have a purpose built place on the frame to store spokes is a minor issue. A nice touch on a touring specific frame, but if you don't have it you just stuff them in your panniers or tape them to your frame.
There is a perfect place for storing spokes on almost every bicycle made since the 1880s. Inside your seat tube, along with as many zipties as you can jam in there.

If you start breaking spokes, it is likely that you are going to need more than two in a cute little holder.

*edit* - late to the party again, bmike was on it already.
radical_edward is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 05:22 PM
  #33  
Thighmaster
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bmike
Personally I'd go XC - I had a dedicated tourer (a Trek 520) that I recently sold as I never really got into it. The CC gives you lots of options for rigging the bike, gears or no, racks, fenders, wide tires. I love mine. Currently running it FG, and I have thought about lite touring on it with my Carradice saddlebag and a handlebar bag.
I also vote for the crosscheck. Load it up for the long haul, rear rack and fenders for the city, strip it down for centuries, fix or singlespeed it, ride it on fireroads and XC trails.

The LHT is optimized for touring, but the crosscheck is a swiss army bike.

If you are lightweight touring or touring between hostels, don't bother with rear specific panniers. Just get 4x front panniers.
radical_edward is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 05:45 PM
  #34  
kemmer's Avatar
*****es love tarck
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,301
Likes: 1
From: Sandy, UT

Bikes: so many

Is $900 out the door for a LHT a good price? I met a shop owner guy who said he could hook me up. Seems pretty damn good to me...
__________________
kemmer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 06:48 PM
  #35  
dmg's Avatar
dmg
Beautiful Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
If you like the smaller wheels of the LHT but want something with horizontal dropouts, the Kogswell P/R looks kind of close...
dmg is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 07:30 PM
  #36  
dirtyphotons's Avatar
antisocialite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,385
Likes: 1
smaller wheels?
dirtyphotons is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 08:00 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Sub 52 cm (I think) frames have 26" wheels and the rest have 700c.

Another difference between the LHT and the CC is the geometry, although not having ridden either I can't really comment.

The top tube on the CC is longer comparetively.
garagegirl is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 08:05 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
The kogswell pr looks like an awesome bike, but you'd better pack a few 650c tires, good luck finding those on the road.
garagegirl is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 08:09 PM
  #39  
blacksheep the blemish
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Portland/Greendale

Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur (manufactured by panasonic), Italvega Super Speciale (fixed, primary ride now), Kona 2004 JTS 10 spd

the seat stays on my sister's lht (which is a 26" wheel frame) are really, really long. I'm not sure about angles and stuff though.
endform is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 09:36 PM
  #40  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by garagegirl
The kogswell pr looks like an awesome bike, but you'd better pack a few 650c tires, good luck finding those on the road.
kogswell p/r has 650b tyres not 650c tyres.

there is a difference.
goldener is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:05 PM
  #41  
dmg's Avatar
dmg
Beautiful Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Originally Posted by dirtyphotons
smaller wheels?
Weird, I thought all sizes of the Trucker had 26" wheels. A friend with a LHT told me that it was for use in 3rd world countries where it's tough to find 700c tires except for racing tires that won't do much good when your bike is loaded...but I guess he's just short and trying to play it off.
dmg is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:08 PM
  #42  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dmg
Weird, I thought all sizes of the Trucker had 26" wheels. A friend with a LHT told me that it was for use in 3rd world countries where it's tough to find 700c tires except for racing tires that won't do much good when your bike is loaded...but I guess he's just short and trying to play it off.
straight from the horse's mouth:
https://www.surlybikes.com/longhaul.html
goldener is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:45 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
"42-54cm accommodate 26" wheels
56-62cm accommodate 700c wheels"
garagegirl is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-07 | 10:46 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by goldener
kogswell p/r has 650b tyres not 650c tyres.

there is a difference.
Oops I meant 650b
Still, same deal.
garagegirl is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.