What is more important? Form or function?
 

Just curious, as there seems to be a divergence here.

Both for me. I'll take a small drop in performance for pretties, but I will also take a drop in aesthetics if it is for significantly better performance. I like my **** to look good and I'm not racing, so small drops in performance don't matter all that much to me, but I do want my bike to work effeciently.

you gotta look good.

equally important to me.

I think we are all guilty of picking form over function from time to time: we all want a bike that looks good. However, I personally feel that when aesthetics interfere with safety or cause severe discomfort, then some line has been crossed. My bike might look a lot better without breaks and a rack, but then I would have trouble stopping myself and the loads of crap I have to carry in my panniers for work. And never forget that the only person who really cares what your bike looks like is you!

If you saw my bike you'd know I chose function over form, actually either the fixed or the geared roadie for that matter. Kind of ugly, but super functional.

My first response would be neither. Fitness is more important.

My second response would be Minimalism, which for a single speed/fixed gear serves both form and function.

it is all functional

just dependson what yer after


http://www.cosplaysupplies.com/footw...duce-202-P.jpg

Fitness wasn't an option, but thanks for your input, even though it was pointless to my questions.

I can't believe I voted wrong in my own poll.
I'm a dumbass.

Oh, a ton of other people care. They just don't matter.

[QUOTE=ChromePista]Blah blah blah blah..[QUOTE]


Are you gonna vote?

Especially with fixed gear bikes, form and function do not seem to be mutually exclusive. When you add gears and derraillers and cables then they start to diverge.

Not trying to be a d!ck, but have you seen the devotion to NJS?

Ultimately function is king, but few of us want something that lacks attractive form. Ideally, you get both.

Judging by the posts in this thread, I would say you are trying.

I have a fixed lowrider.. I think that about covers it... heheh

You judge incorrectly, sir.

So, function obviously. You just forgot to state that your function is to be the man.

I try to find a balance with more emphasis on function. I mean, if I can't use it, it doesn't matter what it looks like.

You can do both...

But seriously, the poll should be aesthetics vs. function, since form is whatever the choices of aesthetics or function end up creating.

Function. My bikes are for riding, not a fashion statement.

function is the most importance, but i want a bike that looks how i like.

why are you here?

what ever, you all don't know what you're talking about, I'm off to buy some new shoes, two days straight is way to long to wear any pair.

…form follows function.

Form and function are one...