Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   Common Chainring? (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/334114-common-chainring.html)

shmee40 08-17-07 06:15 AM

Common Chainring?
 
SO what is the most common gearing rings you all use on on your ss? I have a 42/18 but i wanted to know if there is a more common combo. thx yall

barba 08-17-07 06:22 AM

I am not sure "common" should be how you judge your gearing, especially since there are many ring/cog combos that will give you the same gear. Factor in preference, fitness and geography, and it gets even murkier. It will also be likely much cheaper to swap your cog. Try 42x16 if your current setup is feeling a little light.

lvleph 08-17-07 06:22 AM

46/16 and 46/17 are pretty common

I am running a 46/19, for spin training and every direction is uphill from my apartment.

Your current gearing has only 3 skid patches. I would worry more about that than what is common. If you went to the same combo I have you would have a slightly higher ratio (2.41 vs 2.33 or 65 GI vs 63 GI) and would have 19 skid patches.

MrCjolsen 08-17-07 07:40 AM

I go back and forth between 40/15 and 42/16. But I own many more chainrings than cogs. Chainrings are actually cheaper.

lvleph 08-17-07 08:17 AM


Originally Posted by MrCjolsen (Post 5088981)
I go back and forth between 40/15 and 42/16. But I own many more chainrings than cogs. Chainrings are actually cheaper.

My chainring cost $70, but I suppose a crappy chainring can be less expensive than a cog. But then again a crappy cog will cost $15.

You like 3 skid patches? Both combos you ride have 3 skid patches.

Landgolier 08-17-07 08:30 AM

Good chainrings don't need to cost all that much -- salsa, surly, FSA, and others all make good stuff for $30-40. Also, chainrings can be a little more up front, but they usually last longer.

OP, please just search, there have been 32452346457.6 gearing threads.

mathletics 08-17-07 09:11 AM


Originally Posted by lvleph (Post 5089199)
My chainring cost $70, but I suppose a crappy chainring can me less expensive than a cog. But then again a crappy cog will cost $15.

You like 3 skid patches? Both combos you ride have 3 skid patches.

3 is not a factor of 16. How are you getting 3 patches from 42/16?

lvleph 08-17-07 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by mathletics (Post 5089585)
3 is not a factor of 16. How are you getting 3 patches from 42/16?

Not sure, I guess it was too early. You would think a mathematician could simplify fractions. lol 42/16 has 8 skid patches, sorry.

shmee40 08-17-07 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by lvleph (Post 5088628)
46/16 and 46/17 are pretty common

I am running a 46/19, for spin training and every direction is uphill from my apartment.

Your current gearing has only 3 skid patches. I would worry more about that than what is common. If you went to the same combo I have you would have a slightly higher ratio (2.41 vs 2.33 or 65 GI vs 63 GI) and would have 19 skid patches.


what is a skid patch?

rational 08-17-07 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by Landgolier (Post 5089311)
OP, please just search, there have been 32452346457.6 gearing threads.

Realistically, at this point in the lifetime of these forums, we should just lock all threads and have everyone search for whatever their question may be.

mathletics 08-17-07 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by lvleph (Post 5089716)
Not sure, I guess it was too early. You would think a mathematician could simplify fractions. lol 42/16 has 8 skid patches, sorry.

No sweat. I've got a BS in math and openly admit that fractions aren't my strong point either.

2372ighost 08-17-07 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by shmee40 (Post 5089804)
what is a skid patch?


http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_sa-o.html#skidpatch

lvleph 08-17-07 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by mathletics (Post 5089940)
No sweat. I've got a BS in math and openly admit that fractions aren't my strong point either.

Working on my PhD. lol I got add, subtract, or multiply either.


Originally Posted by rational (Post 5089928)
Realistically, at this point in the lifetime of these forums, we should just lock all threads and have everyone search for whatever their question may be.

They should do that for most of the UBUNTU forums too. lol

rational 08-17-07 10:45 AM


Originally Posted by lvleph (Post 5090199)
They should do that for most of the UBUNTU forums too. lol

Need helpz with Beryl. It crashes my Dell. PLZ HALP!!11eleven!!shiftone!1!!

bboysubhuman 08-17-07 11:04 AM

From what I've seen, 42 and 48 are pretty common chainrings for people riding conversions. A lot of old ten speeds have them.

shmee40 08-17-07 11:07 AM

I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?

caloso 08-17-07 11:08 AM


Originally Posted by bboysubhuman (Post 5090432)
From what I've seen, 42 and 48 are pretty common chainrings for people riding conversions. A lot of old ten speeds have them.

Yup. 52-42 was the standard road double until the 90s. Right now I'm riding 42 / 15 (and a 17t freewheel para las montanas.)

caloso 08-17-07 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by shmee40 (Post 5090455)
I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?

Not if you put a big enough cog in back.

52/19 < 42/15

(check it out: http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/)

roadfix 08-17-07 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by shmee40 (Post 5090455)
I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?

You'll have more street practical gear inch latitude with the 42. (more practical cog choices)

shmee40 09-27-07 10:08 PM

UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1

mathletics 09-27-07 10:15 PM


Originally Posted by shmee40 (Post 5349844)
UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1

You now have 1 skid patch. Not good.

dizzy101 09-28-07 08:38 PM

43-17 all the way baby. slightly smaller than the ubiquitous 42-16, but barely

lvleph 09-28-07 08:51 PM


Originally Posted by shmee40 (Post 5349844)
UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1

Actually, it is probably less efficient, since you will not be spinning as much. Not that 81 GI can't be spun, but...

scirocco25 09-28-07 10:13 PM

I rode 48/14 for a long time. You guys with your 42 rings are sissies.

lvleph 09-28-07 10:27 PM


Originally Posted by scirocco25 (Post 5356802)
I rode 48/14 for a long time. You guys with your 42 rings are sissies.

Especially anyone riding a 42/12, huh?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.