Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Common Chainring?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Common Chainring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-07 | 06:15 AM
  #1  
shmee40's Avatar
Thread Starter
banana cognac
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Common Chainring?

SO what is the most common gearing rings you all use on on your ss? I have a 42/18 but i wanted to know if there is a more common combo. thx yall
shmee40 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 06:22 AM
  #2  
barba's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
I am not sure "common" should be how you judge your gearing, especially since there are many ring/cog combos that will give you the same gear. Factor in preference, fitness and geography, and it gets even murkier. It will also be likely much cheaper to swap your cog. Try 42x16 if your current setup is feeling a little light.
barba is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 06:22 AM
  #3  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

46/16 and 46/17 are pretty common

I am running a 46/19, for spin training and every direction is uphill from my apartment.

Your current gearing has only 3 skid patches. I would worry more about that than what is common. If you went to the same combo I have you would have a slightly higher ratio (2.41 vs 2.33 or 65 GI vs 63 GI) and would have 19 skid patches.
lvleph is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 07:40 AM
  #4  
MrCjolsen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 4
From: Davis CA

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion

I go back and forth between 40/15 and 42/16. But I own many more chainrings than cogs. Chainrings are actually cheaper.
MrCjolsen is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 08:17 AM
  #5  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Originally Posted by MrCjolsen
I go back and forth between 40/15 and 42/16. But I own many more chainrings than cogs. Chainrings are actually cheaper.
My chainring cost $70, but I suppose a crappy chainring can be less expensive than a cog. But then again a crappy cog will cost $15.

You like 3 skid patches? Both combos you ride have 3 skid patches.

Last edited by lvleph; 09-28-07 at 08:49 PM.
lvleph is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 1
Good chainrings don't need to cost all that much -- salsa, surly, FSA, and others all make good stuff for $30-40. Also, chainrings can be a little more up front, but they usually last longer.

OP, please just search, there have been 32452346457.6 gearing threads.
Landgolier is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 09:11 AM
  #7  
mathletics's Avatar
jerk store
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Boston

Bikes: '80s Chimo Garbage fixed 36/14, Centurion fixed 42/17

Originally Posted by lvleph
My chainring cost $70, but I suppose a crappy chainring can me less expensive than a cog. But then again a crappy cog will cost $15.

You like 3 skid patches? Both combos you ride have 3 skid patches.
3 is not a factor of 16. How are you getting 3 patches from 42/16?
mathletics is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 09:31 AM
  #8  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Originally Posted by mathletics
3 is not a factor of 16. How are you getting 3 patches from 42/16?
Not sure, I guess it was too early. You would think a mathematician could simplify fractions. lol 42/16 has 8 skid patches, sorry.
lvleph is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
shmee40's Avatar
Thread Starter
banana cognac
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Originally Posted by lvleph
46/16 and 46/17 are pretty common

I am running a 46/19, for spin training and every direction is uphill from my apartment.

Your current gearing has only 3 skid patches. I would worry more about that than what is common. If you went to the same combo I have you would have a slightly higher ratio (2.41 vs 2.33 or 65 GI vs 63 GI) and would have 19 skid patches.

what is a skid patch?
shmee40 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 09:58 AM
  #10  
rational's Avatar
<3=3o'
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by Landgolier
OP, please just search, there have been 32452346457.6 gearing threads.
Realistically, at this point in the lifetime of these forums, we should just lock all threads and have everyone search for whatever their question may be.
rational is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 10:00 AM
  #11  
mathletics's Avatar
jerk store
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Boston

Bikes: '80s Chimo Garbage fixed 36/14, Centurion fixed 42/17

Originally Posted by lvleph
Not sure, I guess it was too early. You would think a mathematician could simplify fractions. lol 42/16 has 8 skid patches, sorry.
No sweat. I've got a BS in math and openly admit that fractions aren't my strong point either.
mathletics is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 10:05 AM
  #12  
2372ighost's Avatar
118AHC "Thunderbirds"
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: AL.

Bikes: Numerous (wife says to many)

Originally Posted by shmee40
what is a skid patch?

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_sa-o.html#skidpatch
2372ighost is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Originally Posted by mathletics
No sweat. I've got a BS in math and openly admit that fractions aren't my strong point either.
Working on my PhD. lol I got add, subtract, or multiply either.

Originally Posted by rational
Realistically, at this point in the lifetime of these forums, we should just lock all threads and have everyone search for whatever their question may be.
They should do that for most of the UBUNTU forums too. lol
lvleph is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 10:45 AM
  #14  
rational's Avatar
<3=3o'
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by lvleph
They should do that for most of the UBUNTU forums too. lol
Need helpz with Beryl. It crashes my Dell. PLZ HALP!!11eleven!!shiftone!1!!
rational is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 11:04 AM
  #15  
bboysubhuman's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Philly
From what I've seen, 42 and 48 are pretty common chainrings for people riding conversions. A lot of old ten speeds have them.
bboysubhuman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 11:07 AM
  #16  
shmee40's Avatar
Thread Starter
banana cognac
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?
shmee40 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 11:08 AM
  #17  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,115
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Originally Posted by bboysubhuman
From what I've seen, 42 and 48 are pretty common chainrings for people riding conversions. A lot of old ten speeds have them.
Yup. 52-42 was the standard road double until the 90s. Right now I'm riding 42 / 15 (and a 17t freewheel para las montanas.)
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 11:11 AM
  #18  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,115
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Originally Posted by shmee40
I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?
Not if you put a big enough cog in back.

52/19 < 42/15

(check it out: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/)
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 08-17-07 | 11:12 AM
  #19  
roadfix's Avatar
hello
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,710
Likes: 136
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by shmee40
I have a 42 and 52. Do u think 52 is too big?
You'll have more street practical gear inch latitude with the 42. (more practical cog choices)
roadfix is offline  
Reply
Old 09-27-07 | 10:08 PM
  #20  
shmee40's Avatar
Thread Starter
banana cognac
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1
shmee40 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-27-07 | 10:15 PM
  #21  
mathletics's Avatar
jerk store
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Boston

Bikes: '80s Chimo Garbage fixed 36/14, Centurion fixed 42/17

Originally Posted by shmee40
UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1
You now have 1 skid patch. Not good.
mathletics is offline  
Reply
Old 09-28-07 | 08:38 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
43-17 all the way baby. slightly smaller than the ubiquitous 42-16, but barely
dizzy101 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-28-07 | 08:51 PM
  #23  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Originally Posted by shmee40
UPDATE: converted from 42/18 to 42/14 and it feels sooooooooooo much better/efficient/faster......my next attempt will be a 42/1
Actually, it is probably less efficient, since you will not be spinning as much. Not that 81 GI can't be spun, but...
lvleph is offline  
Reply
Old 09-28-07 | 10:13 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I rode 48/14 for a long time. You guys with your 42 rings are sissies.
scirocco25 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-28-07 | 10:27 PM
  #25  
Should be out Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 2
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Originally Posted by scirocco25
I rode 48/14 for a long time. You guys with your 42 rings are sissies.
Especially anyone riding a 42/12, huh?
lvleph is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.