Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Fixed chain snap... yowch.

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Fixed chain snap... yowch.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-07 | 10:48 PM
  #1  
HappyHumber's Avatar
Thread Starter
bring back ASCII art
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 5
From: Perth, Western Australia
Fixed chain snap... yowch.

Ok guys - I've had my bit of excitement and sat down to count my lucky stars since; but yesterday I snapped my chain about halfway through an intersection, just levelling out at the bottom of a downhill. Of course instant lock up of the back wheel & cranks. Luckily for me the road was pretty wet and this enabled me to skid reasonably long, gather my wits, get to the kerb and unclipped for a pretty well controlled stop.

I guess now is the post mortem time for the chain. Just revisiting what I think I might done, or rather not done, to let this happen. I'm keen to get back on the fixie, but obviously keen to prevent this happening again.


The chain itself itself was a 3/32" KMC "Narrow" Z chain about 4 or 5 months old with about 600km on it. The running gear was the stock kit removed from my project Steamroller; ie. 17t Surly cog, Sugino 48t Ring, Sugino RD crank. I had built up the mid 80s MBK road frame as a conversion with pretty near perfect chainline, using the straight-edge method of checking.

I had been riding this quite succesfully since the build - with no funny noises, rubbing or grinding. I've been negotiating up & downhills no worries and mastering gradually more graceful trackstands.

My biggest suspicion is that I might have let the chain slack. I hadn't really checked it since the initial buildup, but noticed recently just by eye it appeared to sag a little more. Is my own laziness in not doing something about this most likely to be the culprit here?

But otherwise... what are the most common causes of chain break on fixed gears. I appreciate that there must be some different stresses in the backpedalling motion/force that a freewheel chain wouldn't experience - which is why I believe the straw that broke the camels back in my case was me controlling my descent through the downhill.

I have some photos of the deceased chain at the break - if they're of any use I can post.
HappyHumber is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:07 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Sweet. I have the same chain...
Little Rider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:10 PM
  #3  
Sizzle-Chest's Avatar
The Brutally Handsome
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 4
From: Siberia
i have had chains break from bad chain alignment from the front chainring to the rear cog, but it sounds like your's was pretty good, right? i remember a mechanic once say that everytime you break a chain (with a chain breaker) and put it back together it is weaker. has that chain been broken many times?
Sizzle-Chest is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:10 PM
  #4  
mathletics's Avatar
jerk store
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Boston

Bikes: '80s Chimo Garbage fixed 36/14, Centurion fixed 42/17

I busted a chain from having it too tight. I won't take any guesses about the cause of your chain failure, because all of my other guesses about stuff today have been wrong.

Keep it properly tensioned, properly lubed, and ride with a brake.
mathletics is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:13 PM
  #5  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
most common cause of chain failure.....improper installation

there isn't more stress on a fixed gear chain. putting backpressure on is no different than pedaling forwards. It's still just chain tension.
There is probably less stress on a fixed gear chain since the chainline is straight. No lateral pressure from cross-chaining across 10 gears.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:14 PM
  #6  
Sizzle-Chest's Avatar
The Brutally Handsome
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 4
From: Siberia
Originally Posted by mathletics
I busted a chain from having it too tight. I won't take any guesses about the cause of your chain failure, because all of my other guesses about stuff today have been wrong.

Keep it properly tensioned, properly lubed, and ride with a brake.
good point, if your front chainring was bent even a little, and your chain was very tight, then the stress put on your chain by the chainring turning would be extremely great (in the pejorative sense of the word)
Sizzle-Chest is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-07 | 11:58 PM
  #7  
HappyHumber's Avatar
Thread Starter
bring back ASCII art
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 5
From: Perth, Western Australia
Originally Posted by Sizzle-Chest
good point, if your front chainring was bent even a little, and your chain was very tight, then the stress put on your chain by the chainring turning would be extremely great (in the pejorative sense of the word)

If anything my chain was slack.

I was concerned that my chainring might have been bent as from the resulting tangle/skid/wedge. Once I got it all home and pulled it apart I noticed that the entire rotation of the chainring evenly rubbed against the chain stay. Though this confused me for a minute but this was due to the chainstay having bendt out slightly. I bent it back loosely and the chain ring ran pretty true. whilst I am not sure of the exact point of rotation where the chain broke - it seemed to throw the remaining chain off and around the base of the driveside crank arm and wedge and stress things from there.

But I guess more immediate concern will be breaking out the string and alligning the chain & seat stays before I worry about the small componet replacement
HappyHumber is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 12:04 AM
  #8  
megatron's Avatar
white men cant jump
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by baxtefer
most common cause of chain failure.....improper installation

there isn't more stress on a fixed gear chain. putting backpressure on is no different than pedaling forwards. It's still just chain tension.
There is probably less stress on a fixed gear chain since the chainline is straight. No lateral pressure from cross-chaining across 10 gears.
are you joking? what about the teeth bashing back against the bushings when you backpedal or resist
megatron is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 12:21 AM
  #9  
HappyHumber's Avatar
Thread Starter
bring back ASCII art
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 5
From: Perth, Western Australia
well.. they bash against the bushings going forward as well.. and they are circular... so I take baxtefer's point to some degree

(why do I get that can-of-worms-opening type feeling....)

My line of thinking is that more sudden staccato like movement of say, a heavier, guy like myself (just shy of 105kg or ~230lb) practising his trackstands with lots of rapid, to and fro movement might have also placed undue stress and weakened the chain as well.
HappyHumber is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 12:33 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence

Bikes: 1994 Paramount conversion

Originally Posted by baxtefer
most common cause of chain failure.....improper installation

there isn't more stress on a fixed gear chain. putting backpressure on is no different than pedaling forwards. It's still just chain tension.
There is probably less stress on a fixed gear chain since the chainline is straight. No lateral pressure from cross-chaining across 10 gears.
While this is true in many situations, how many people do you know that can break traction pedaling forward on a geared bike (the equivalent tension of skidding)?
ersatz radio is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
HappyHumber's Avatar
Thread Starter
bring back ASCII art
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 5
From: Perth, Western Australia
Originally Posted by Sizzle-Chest
i remember a mechanic once say that everytime you break a chain (with a chain breaker) and put it back together it is weaker. has that chain been broken many times?
Never... only the time I removed a couple links when it was new out of the box to get the right length. I bought a masterlink at the same time and used that upon installation. I hadn't even used that again since.

Not that it's probably of any significance, more coincidence; the break was only one link from the master.
HappyHumber is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 06:16 AM
  #12  
deathhare's Avatar
:jarckass:
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,562
Likes: 1
From: Nashville
Id like to see a pic of how it broke.
deathhare is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 07:19 AM
  #13  
Does Not Exist
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
From: Voltairia
Originally Posted by ersatz radio
While this is true in many situations, how many people do you know that can break traction pedaling forward on a geared bike (the equivalent tension of skidding)?
Those situations are not equivalent. When skidding, one unweights the rear wheel to initiate the skid. When people pedal forward, they do not do this.

Some cyclists can deliver 1800 Watts. Their chains don't break. It's highly unlikely that a broken chain is actually due to stresses caused by typical urban fixed gear riding. It's really hard (i.e. impossible) to break a properly installed chain with no manufacturing defects.

I think the original suspicion of too much slack is probably correct. Originally I suspected the OP reused a pin on installation (don't do that with 9/10-speed chains), but he used a Masterlink.
efficiency is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 08:09 AM
  #14  
cab horn
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 30
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Chain breaks =

1) Improper installation
2) manufacturing defect
operator is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 08:51 AM
  #15  
fatbat's Avatar
spinspinspinspin
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Glad to hear you're ok.

One possibility is that you threw your chain first, then broke it.
If your chain is wound around the rear hub instead of the cog, then you will exert a bunch of sideways stress on the chain, probably enough to break it.
fatbat is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 09:35 AM
  #16  
9Rings's Avatar
Boston did not sob
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HappyHumber
Ok guys - I've had my bit of excitement and sat down to count my lucky stars since; but yesterday I snapped my chain about halfway through an intersection, just levelling out at the bottom of a downhill. Of course instant lock up of the back wheel & cranks. Luckily for me the road was pretty wet and this enabled me to skid reasonably long, gather my wits, get to the kerb and unclipped for a pretty well controlled stop.

.
Please post pics of the chain.

From your assertion that you had just bottomed out from a downhill + slack chain perhaps equals thrown chain quickly followed by rear cog wrap & break with bonus skid through intersection.

Glad you're OK, though.
9Rings is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 09:50 AM
  #17  
Re-Cycle's Avatar
<3s bikes
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 1
From: CA

Bikes: lots

the chain is not the problem. Either the slack in the chain allowed it to derail slightly and the inertia of your forward movement broke the chain or the chain separated where you pushed the pin back in when installing the chain. Either way I say get another Z chain and put it on with no slack.
Re-Cycle is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 09:52 AM
  #18  
71 Peugeot. fixed.
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities
I would tend to agree with him throwing the chain first, then breaking it. It wouldn't make sense to me for the chain to just snap, and that would somehow lock up the wheel.
willypilgrim is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 10:19 AM
  #19  
.
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
I don't know if it's of any significance, but the OP was running an odd-number cog on an even chainring. Jedi Master Sheldon contraindicates this, as it contributes to uneven chain wear (if I understand him correctly, which isn't certain). 48/17 is a pretty beefy ratio, especially with a 230lb guy mashing down suddenly-- could uneven chain wear combined with such a monster load have caused the cahin to fail?

I''m not asserting anything here, just asking, so I'd appreciate not being jumped on if I'm way off the mark...
Gordiep is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 10:20 AM
  #20  
blickblocks's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ersatz radio
While this is true in many situations, how many people do you know that can break traction pedaling forward on a geared bike (the equivalent tension of skidding)?
If I unweigh the rear wheel because I'm standing up like a gopher in traffic, I can break traction. It's not hard.
__________________
https://blicksbags.com/
blickblocks is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 10:29 AM
  #21  
9Rings's Avatar
Boston did not sob
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Gordiep
I don't know if it's of any significance, but the OP was running an odd-number cog on an even chainring. Jedi Master Sheldon contraindicates this, as it contributes to uneven chain wear (if I understand him correctly, which isn't certain). 48/17 is a pretty beefy ratio, especially with a 230lb guy mashing down suddenly-- could uneven chain wear combined with such a monster load have caused the cahin to fail?

I''m not asserting anything here, just asking, so I'd appreciate not being jumped on if I'm way off the mark...
I *think* Sheldon is refering to uneven wear in the event that you want to replace the cog/chainring or something. If you have even numbered gearing you can always get the teeth to line up with the previous worn spots.
9Rings is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 11:22 AM
  #22  
666pack's Avatar
tarck bike.com exile
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 0
From: lancaster, pennsylvania

Bikes: bfssfg iro--black.

could the masterlink be at fault?

i don't use them because they scare me.
666pack is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 11:47 AM
  #23  
Sheldon Brown's Avatar
Gone, but not forgotten
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 12
From: Newtonville, Massachusetts

Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles

Originally Posted by HappyHumber
My biggest suspicion is that I might have let the chain slack.
That would be my guess too. A slack chan can wiggle so that the top of a tooth bumps into a side plate. That can generate a LOT of force on a fixed gear.
Originally Posted by Gordiep
I don't know if it's of any significance, but the OP was running an odd-number cog on an even chainring. Jedi Master Sheldon contraindicates this, as it contributes to uneven chain wear (if I understand him correctly, which isn't certain). 48/17 is a pretty beefy ratio, especially with a 230lb guy mashing down suddenly-- could uneven chain wear combined with such a monster load have caused the cahin to fail?
Not clear that it's a "monster load." Indeed, it doesn't sound like it to me. The magnitude of the load is related to the size of the sprocket driving the chain, not the ratio.

Thus, the pedaling load is _less_ with a large ring like a 48 than it would be with, say, a 42.

If the force was being applied by the rear spocket, as when resisting to slow down, a 17 tooth sprocket would not pull as hard a a smaller one, say a 15, would.

Sheldon "Loose Chains Break" Brown
Sheldon Brown is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 11:48 AM
  #24  
park ranger
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,794
Likes: 0
From: mars

Bikes: recumbents

i would suspect:

masterlink
improper installation
chain dropping then breaking because it got stuck
manufacturer defect

i doubt 600 miles is enough to weaken a chain from just wear. i don't see how slack in the chain could've made it break. maybe it made it drop and then that force exerted on it after it got wedged in the hub made it break.
piwonka is offline  
Reply
Old 08-20-07 | 11:52 AM
  #25  
.
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown
That would be my guess too. A slack chan can wiggle so that the top of a tooth bumps into a side plate. That can generate a LOT of force on a fixed gear.
Not clear that it's a "monster load." Indeed, it doesn't sound like it to me. The magnitude of the load is related to the size of the sprocket driving the chain, not the ratio.

Thus, the pedaling load is _less_ with a large ring like a 48 than it would be with, say, a 42.

If the force was being applied by the rear spocket, as when resisting to slow down, a 17 tooth sprocket would not pull as hard a a smaller one, say a 15, would.

Sheldon "Loose Chains Break" Brown
Good lord. It's spooky when he does that...amazing, but spooky.
Gordiep is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.