Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Single Speeds with only a front brake!?!

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Single Speeds with only a front brake!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-07, 01:44 AM
  #76  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^twice
time bandit is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 12:15 PM
  #77  
dude.
Thread Starter
 
stormywaters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: white turbo saddle
Posts: 52

Bikes: mine

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roadgator
no matter how recently the subject was brought up, this troll never fails to draw posts.

I say the thread will get to 5 pages before puttering out. cast your votes (or self fulfilling prophecies) now!
I am amazed at, for how little I post, how many replies my posts get.

good times.
stormywaters is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 12:18 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by time bandit
no freakin way. if your riding a ss, you need a rear brake, end of discussion. FOREVER. no matter what.
What about all those BMX kids who ride brakeless SS?
Yoshi is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:24 PM
  #79  
raodmaster shaman
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: G-ville
Posts: 1,431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stormywaters
I am amazed at, for how little I post, how many replies my posts get.

good times.
oh i wasn't trying to call you a troll, just the subject.

almost to 5!
roadgator is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:27 PM
  #80  
*****es love tarck
 
kemmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 3,301

Bikes: so many

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by time bandit
no freakin way. if your riding a ss, you need a rear brake, end of discussion. FOREVER. no matter what.
I still haven't seen a compelling argument that proves that you MUST have a rear brake on a SS to ride it safely.
__________________
kemmer is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:28 PM
  #81  
*****es love tarck
 
kemmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 3,301

Bikes: so many

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by roadgator
oh i wasn't trying to call you a troll, just the subject.

almost to 5!
Of course he's a troll.
__________________
kemmer is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:30 PM
  #82  
raodmaster shaman
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: G-ville
Posts: 1,431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
well i havent tracked the rest of his postings, so maybe you are right.
roadgator is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:43 PM
  #83  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NitroPye
^^ Wrong. Upwards of 80% of your braking power on a motorcycle is from the front brake.

They tell you to NEVER lock your rear (which is instinct in emergency situations) because locking your rear will toss you into a low slide skid which.. a skid on a bicycle is fine and dandy but I dare you to try holding onto a 600lb vehicle while doing one. I was lucky the one time I locked up my rear, .. very lucky. After much quick brake practicing the next time I was in a dangerous situation I kept from locking the rear and put all my effort into the front brake and I stopped much safer and cleaner (stopped so fast I burned brake fluid too)

Proper braking technique on a motorcycle (aside from engine braking) is using front brake while applying a little on your rear for control.

This is why I have my front brake on the right on my SS. Bicycle braking is similar in that braking in your front is far more efficient but since a bicycle is so light the rear brake comes into play more so.
Where does the other 20% come from? I have been riding for 15 years, worked in the motorsports industry for last 10, trained people to become better motorcyclists and worked as a test rider at the Desert Proving Grounds in Mesa Arizona. There are many different braking techniques that can be used in different situations, but hands down the fastest way to stop a motorcycle is to use both brakes and pull in the clutch. I didn't say lock the rear. I said to use both brakes and pull in the clutch.
AnarkistAttack is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:46 PM
  #84  
NitroPye
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
^^ I suggest rereading what I said.

Proper braking technique on a motorcycle (aside from engine braking) is using front brake while applying a little on your rear for control.
Basically in your statement calling limited back breaking b.s. is a false blanket statement. There are very good reasons why the front brake is the more powerful and the brake that a lot of places are teaching people to use by itself until they understand the bike more and get into more advanced riding / skill levels.
 
Old 11-21-07, 03:23 PM
  #85  
aspiring dirtbag commuter
 
max-a-mill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: philly
Posts: 2,123
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kemmer
I still haven't seen a compelling argument that proves that you MUST have a rear brake on a SS to ride it safely.
what about slowing down on a sketchy leaf covered turn going down a hill?

lock up the back wheel; no biggie...

lock up the front; BOOM! down you go.

also, if you have two brakes and never use the back one your not stopping as quickly as you can... why?
max-a-mill is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 03:48 PM
  #86  
NitroPye
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by max-a-mill
also, if you have two brakes and never use the back one your not stopping as quickly as you can... why?
Probably the same reason some people don't wear helmets
 
Old 11-21-07, 03:55 PM
  #87  
Elitest Murray Owner
 
Mos6502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657

Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I actually removed the rear brakes from my car.

Factories put the rear brakes on, because they are totally useless and unnecessary; engineers know this, and that is why they always include them in their designs. I'm pretty sure I'm smarter than the engineers who decided rear brakes were a good and necessary idea. Besides, don't they just add more weight and make it harder to stop? And don't rear brakes look so much more hideous than front brakes? Barf out - gag me with a spoon.

A locked front wheel also provides 0% directional control. How cool!

Last edited by Mos6502; 11-21-07 at 04:21 PM.
Mos6502 is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 04:37 PM
  #88  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kemmer
I still haven't seen a compelling argument that proves that you MUST have a rear brake on a SS to ride it safely.

Hahaha, you have to be kidding me.
time bandit is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:01 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PGH
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Once more with feeling:

Sheldon MFing Brown
pinkmike is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:05 PM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
Marrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Used to be there, now I'm here.
Posts: 1,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pinkmike
Once more with feeling:

Sheldon MFing Brown
Maybe if you did it in bold with a really large font...
Marrock is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:08 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PGH
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sheldon dagnabbit Brown has the answers.

You're right. Much better.
pinkmike is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:12 PM
  #92  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
but in NO WAY does he TELL YOU TO ONLY RUN A FRONT. In https://sheldonbrown.com/fixed.html if you scroll down to "Flip-flop hubs" you will read:

"Also, note that you should have two brakes if you will be using a freewheel."

There, done, fugheddaboutit.
time bandit is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:17 PM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
People take that Sheldon Brown article WAY out of context. He absolutely advocates using TWO brakes on any bike with a freewheel.

The point of his article is that the majority of braking force in normal, dry conditions is from the front brake and that proper braking begins with understanding this.

In wet, sandy or otherwise adverse conditions a rear brake is invaluable and will probably save you a lot of skin.
Yoshi is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:27 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
Marrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Used to be there, now I'm here.
Posts: 1,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I tend to haul around a loaded BoB trailer a lot so having two sets of brakes is vital, even on flat dry roads it takes a lot to get that thing to stop in anything even remotely resembling a short distance.
Marrock is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:45 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PGH
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey, I'll never have a freewheel bike (other than a coaster cruiser) with only a front brake. But I think the rhetoric goes pretty crazy in the other direction as well, as in: "OMGz if u dont run 2 breaks the terrorists win!!!!!1!!!111!!!!one!"
pinkmike is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:49 PM
  #96  
NitroPye
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
^^ I think they just did....
 
Old 11-21-07, 07:03 PM
  #97  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NitroPye
^^ I suggest rereading what I said.



Basically in your statement calling limited back breaking b.s. is a false blanket statement. There are very good reasons why the front brake is the more powerful and the brake that a lot of places are teaching people to use by itself until they understand the bike more and get into more advanced riding / skill levels.
Talking to you is like trying to reason with a monkey. I never said that limited back braking was bs. I said that the statement that people are being taught not to use their back brake was bs. I personally teach people to safely ride their motorcycles at speeds in excess of 100 mph. I personally have ridden a motorcycle every single day for the last ten years. I personally have ridden motorcycles that will not see production for several years at speeds you wouldn't believe while working as a test rider. I personally could care less if you believe me, but buddy you're an amatuer talking to an expert.
AnarkistAttack is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 07:07 PM
  #98  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Yoshi
What about all those BMX kids who ride brakeless SS?
true. they are nuts. but i guess thats when the low gear ratio/top speed and the ability to literally walk off of the moving bike helps. I would still never do it.
time bandit is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 08:12 PM
  #99  
:jarckass:
 
deathhare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by time bandit
i guess thats when the low gear ratio/top speed and the ability to literally walk off of the moving bike helps. I would still never do it.
I guess you never rode BMX seriously.
The most common ratio those guys run is 74.2 inches. Thatll get you pretty damn fast.
Definitely cant "literally walk off of the moving bike" at that speed. But you can crash hard if you need to.
Not to mention there are such things as hills in the world.
deathhare is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 08:47 PM
  #100  
¡Senor Member!
 
time bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Philly
Posts: 1,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by deathhare
I guess you never rode BMX seriously.
No, i haven't, but have know quite a few sponsored bmx guys, and most of them who took it "seriously" rode at least one brake.

Originally Posted by deathhare
The most common ratio those guys run is 74.2 inches. That'll get you pretty damn fast.
Please, oh please give me some sort of reference or source where you came up with that particular number. this should be good.

I have personally worked in a small bmx shop in NEPA and have never seen, save for brake riding actual RACERS, anyone go over 65gi.

Why do people talk like this?

Last edited by time bandit; 11-21-07 at 08:57 PM.
time bandit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.