Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

brakeless & your gear ratio

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

brakeless & your gear ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-07 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
I_luv_hooters
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
brakeless & your gear ratio

So I went brakeless about 2 weeks ago. Just a trial - they're available to go back on anytime I feel like it. But I don't yet feel like it. Now today I lowered my gear ratio dramatically. Its now 44x18. I think it's way safer this way. Yes, I'm slower but I'm also more in control of my bike (especially down hill). It also resolves any skidding issues I had. I can now do multiple powerslides and skid w/out even getting out of my seat. I can pretty much stop on a dime. My question is: What ratio do you other brakeless riders use? Do you agree going to a lower gear helps? Also: did any of you go back to a brake?
 
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 05:59 PM
  #2  
Sekt's Avatar
Arrr!
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Hobart, Australia
I also ride 44x18. Mostly for the hills around here though.
Sekt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
Boss Moniker's Avatar
It's an old photo
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Entropia

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Specialized Hardrock

When I was riding brakeless I had a 46x19 ratio.. I didn't have any close calls, but then again I only rode that bike for a season before I got a new one. And really, the main reason I went brakeless was because there was some crazy clearance on the front tire (700c in a lazy 27" fork) and I couldn't get my sidepulls to work well. I was too lazy to get a good brake, so I just left it off.

With my new bike, I do have a front brake, but then again I commute more often on it, and ride 46x17. I would only dream of taking off the front brake when I visit the velodrome.. that ratio is a little too high for me to skid consistently. But then again I'm a pretty small guy.
Boss Moniker is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 06:46 PM
  #4  
tylergarrison's Avatar
loser.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
40x15 and 44x16 here, both brakeless. the first bike because i was too lazy/cheap to buy a cable and lever and didn't happen to have one lying around. the second is because i don't wanna scuff up the paint on the rims...i am realizing more and more every day how dumb that might be but god damn they look good. never really had any issues...the type of bars you run will affect your control as well, as you know. i run a flat bar on my new bike and i feel pretty unsafe when it comes to needing to pull off a clutch skid or powerslide. with my chop and flops i felt pretty damn safe...good solid hand positions for those "oh ****" moments.
tylergarrison is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:31 PM
  #5  
parkerlewis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
46/16 is as heavy as I feel safe with..but I much prefer 17 rear cog, and run that 95 percent of the time, anything lighter, and you can stop really quickly once you get used to it for a few months
parkerlewis is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:37 PM
  #6  
TehK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: 2003 Novara Randonnee, Miyata 512, Mercier Kilo TT

Broke my break lever recently, so I'm riding 48/16 brakeless, which is tough, plan on getting a new lever, and switching to 46/17 for brakeless fun.
TehK is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:39 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
From: four 1 OHHH , Maryland

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

49/17
jdms mvp is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:39 PM
  #8  
c0urt's Avatar
moving target
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,952
Likes: 156
From: birmingham, al

Bikes: looks like a specialized crux now

74 gear inches and happy
c0urt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
Oh No's Avatar
TARCK BIKE DOT COM
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: 610 tarck bike city

Bikes: your mother on wheeeeeelz

48/17

17 skid patches, 70.50 inches.
Oh No is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 07:51 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: rva

Bikes: lotus grand prix (82) , iro jamie roy

i ride 46/16 brakeless. i've got empty threads on the other side of my hub, thinking of getting an 18 tooth cog for my steep climbs on the way home from work. my roommate rides a 44/18 and it drives me crazy when i ride it. you can skid the rear tire if you take off too quickly.... i stop just fine with my gearing. i've had my fair share of close calls, but never because i couldn't stop in time.
ex_ssn_yn1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:14 PM
  #11  
I_luv_hooters
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Oh No
48/17

17 skid patches, 70.50 inches.
skid patch ratios:



45x15 = 1 skidpatch? WTF???

Last edited by I_luv_hooters; 12-11-07 at 08:24 PM.
 
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:28 PM
  #12  
lordgold's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: RVA
https://software.bareknucklebrigade.c...it.applet.html
lordgold is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:35 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
From: four 1 OHHH , Maryland

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

Originally Posted by Oh No
48/17

17 skid patches, 70.50 inches.
my math might be off, but isn't it more like 74 ish gear inches?

i know my 49/17 is around 76 inches
jdms mvp is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:50 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
44x15. I can stop just fine. I'll probably gear up to 44x17 though, I miss the spin.
Igneous Faction is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:51 PM
  #15  
humancongereel's Avatar
live free or die trying
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,999
Likes: 0
From: where i lay my head is home.

Bikes: bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion

Originally Posted by I_luv_hooters
skid patch ratios:



45x15 = 1 skidpatch? WTF???
just like 48x16, it's a 3:1 ratio. and 48x12 is a 4:1 ratio. i forget the proper mathematical term for expressing it, but the ratios can be reduced to an integer:1 ratio.
humancongereel is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
I failed math, so can someone explain to me Gear Inches? And whats good or bad? (high or low)

thanks

Also which is best...
48 x16
48 x 17
48 x 18

?

I really suck at math.
Prime is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:56 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Oh No
48/17

17 skid patches, 70.50 inches.
48/17 too... but its more like 75 gi
SamHatesCarCltr is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 08:59 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
From: four 1 OHHH , Maryland

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

Originally Posted by Prime
I failed math, so can someone explain to me Gear Inches? And whats good or bad? (high or low)

thanks
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_g.html#gearinch

lower the gear inches the "Easier"

i was always under the impression it was for every pedal rotation (full) you travel so many inches.
jdms mvp is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 09:13 PM
  #19  
kyle!'s Avatar
what.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: SD, CA, USA

Bikes: raleigh rush hour

48/18

i didn't want the heavier 48/17, but i didn't wanna spin like mad on a 19 cog. feels fine to me.
kyle! is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:03 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by humancongereel
just like 48x16, it's a 3:1 ratio. and 48x12 is a 4:1 ratio. i forget the proper mathematical term for expressing it, but the ratios can be reduced to an integer:1 ratio.
The number of skid patches is equal to the number of teeth on the cog divided by the greatest common factor between the chainring and cog.

Since 15 divides 45, the greatest common factor is 15 and you are left with one skid patch.

The best gear combinations are ones that are relatively prime - their greatest common factor is 1.
Yoshi is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:04 PM
  #21  
c0urt's Avatar
moving target
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,952
Likes: 156
From: birmingham, al

Bikes: looks like a specialized crux now

40x14 13 skid patches
650c wheels
my math may be off but it should be close this time
c0urt is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:05 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
I really suck at math.

Originally Posted by Yoshi
The number of skid patches is equal to the number of teeth on the cog divided by the greatest common factor between the chainring and cog.

Since 15 divides 45, the greatest common factor is 15 and you are left with one skid patch.

The best gear combinations are ones that are relatively prime - their greatest common factor is 1.
Soo...

48 17 > 48 18?
Or
48 17 < 48 18?
Prime is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:18 PM
  #23  
humancongereel's Avatar
live free or die trying
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,999
Likes: 0
From: where i lay my head is home.

Bikes: bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion

Originally Posted by c0urt
40x14 13 skid patches
650c wheels
my math may be off but it should be close this time
7 skid patches, right? the greatest common factor of 40 and 14 is 2, 14/2=7. am i right? i think i'm grasping the math now...i've read about this a few times, but it's always big proofs and such, and it loses me by the end. this explanation is one of the simplest i've heard.
humancongereel is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:30 PM
  #24  
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: not a bike lane in sight, TX
Wait, a greater number of skid patches is better right?
evictionsurplus is offline  
Reply
Old 12-11-07 | 10:33 PM
  #25  
71 Peugeot. fixed.
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities
48x18, but as soon as I buy a lockring wrench I'm dropping to 17 for more skid patches, since i have like, none now.
willypilgrim is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.