Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

recomended crank arm length?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

recomended crank arm length?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-08, 07:39 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: santa ana, CA
Posts: 55

Bikes: Bottecchia

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
recomended crank arm length?

as the title says. 170mm,165,mm or 160. i have no idea. mostly gonna use the bike for commuting. whats the difference? thanks in advance
iammbox is offline  
Old 07-08-08, 07:57 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 854

Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Miyata 310 (conversion)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i would say 165, i'm running 170 right now and wish they were a lil shorter.
Metricoclock is offline  
Old 07-08-08, 08:20 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 1 Post
how tall are you? how fast will you ride? how hard do you corner? how hilly is the route?

short arms favor shorter legs, high rpm spinning, cornering clearance, and less leverage.
longer, the opposite.

i have fairly short legs (29" inseam), ride 20mph +/- 5 in rolling hills, and watch my corners. i started with 165 and moved to 170. i like the extra leverage, upped my gear one tooth to slow the spin and take advantage. have yet to strike a pedal, but do try to keep the bike more upright in the corners.

$0.02.
dookie is offline  
Old 07-08-08, 09:23 PM
  #4  
IRL Banhammer
 
idiq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: RVA
Posts: 664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
170's.

165 is for higher cadence / spinning. I had 165's (ride a 54cm, 5'9, 32" inseam) and like the 170's a lot better.
__________________
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode
idiq is offline  
Old 07-08-08, 09:51 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: santa ana, CA
Posts: 55

Bikes: Bottecchia

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ahh i see. thanks for all the info and help
iammbox is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 08:22 AM
  #6  
teamn9ne
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: richmond, va
Posts: 60

Bikes: the hour

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 65 on the right and a 70 on the left!
its awesome....nooot
but hey I gotta use what I got
slotmachine is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 08:29 AM
  #7  
Street Pharmacist
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the yay
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slotmachine
I have a 65 on the right and a 70 on the left!
its awesome....nooot
but hey I gotta use what I got
o.O
Pennywize is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 09:40 AM
  #8  
Raving looney
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,482

Bikes: 70s Leader Precision w/Shimano 600 (road), IRO Rob Roy (Fixed)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pennywize
o.O
lol +1

I have 170s on my Rob Roy, have yet to strike a pedal, but have ground/scratched up the crank ends with bad pedal position going over obstacles (oops... beausage?). Seem to work nicely for me, I can still spin upto 120/130 usually no problem, higher than that is a rare effort
Flimflam is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 08:06 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Compromise with 167.5
legstwelve is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 08:46 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
PanFry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ATL
Posts: 163

Bikes: SS 29er Rigid, Kilo Stripper & Litespeed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anybody running 175's? I have a 35" inseam and I wonder if 170's would be long enough.

???

Any thoughts?

PF
PanFry is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 09:09 PM
  #11  
Street Pharmacist
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the yay
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
pedal strike sucks. 165 is ideal
Pennywize is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 09:11 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
sfcrossrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760

Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PanFry
Anybody running 175's? I have a 35" inseam and I wonder if 170's would be long enough.

???

Any thoughts?

PF
I have 175s on my FG cross bike. I have yet to have any issue in a race, or otherwise. If you're tall... 175s are the way to go.
sfcrossrider is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 09:15 PM
  #13  
IRL Banhammer
 
idiq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: RVA
Posts: 664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pennywize
pedal strike sucks. 165 is ideal
If you have an actual FG you don't have to worry as the BB is almost as high as a mountain bike... if you're riding some road conversion, pedal strike is more of a threat.
__________________
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode
idiq is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 09:59 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
PanFry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ATL
Posts: 163

Bikes: SS 29er Rigid, Kilo Stripper & Litespeed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool.

Originally Posted by idiq
If you have an actual FG you don't have to worry as the BB is almost as high as a mountain bike... if you're riding some road conversion, pedal strike is more of a threat.
62cm. IRO Mark V. I think I will stick with 175's.

Many Thanks,

PF
PanFry is offline  
Old 07-09-08, 10:04 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have some FSA Vero which are like 173.5 or some **** like that


I really want 165's to see what spinning is like w/ the shorter crank arms
iansmash is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.