recomended crank arm length?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: santa ana, CA
Posts: 55
Bikes: Bottecchia
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
recomended crank arm length?
as the title says. 170mm,165,mm or 160. i have no idea. mostly gonna use the bike for commuting. whats the difference? thanks in advance
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
1 Post
how tall are you? how fast will you ride? how hard do you corner? how hilly is the route?
short arms favor shorter legs, high rpm spinning, cornering clearance, and less leverage.
longer, the opposite.
i have fairly short legs (29" inseam), ride 20mph +/- 5 in rolling hills, and watch my corners. i started with 165 and moved to 170. i like the extra leverage, upped my gear one tooth to slow the spin and take advantage. have yet to strike a pedal, but do try to keep the bike more upright in the corners.
$0.02.
short arms favor shorter legs, high rpm spinning, cornering clearance, and less leverage.
longer, the opposite.
i have fairly short legs (29" inseam), ride 20mph +/- 5 in rolling hills, and watch my corners. i started with 165 and moved to 170. i like the extra leverage, upped my gear one tooth to slow the spin and take advantage. have yet to strike a pedal, but do try to keep the bike more upright in the corners.
$0.02.
#4
IRL Banhammer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: RVA
Posts: 664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
170's.
165 is for higher cadence / spinning. I had 165's (ride a 54cm, 5'9, 32" inseam) and like the 170's a lot better.
165 is for higher cadence / spinning. I had 165's (ride a 54cm, 5'9, 32" inseam) and like the 170's a lot better.
__________________
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode
#7
Street Pharmacist
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the yay
Posts: 257
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Raving looney
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,482
Bikes: 70s Leader Precision w/Shimano 600 (road), IRO Rob Roy (Fixed)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
lol +1
I have 170s on my Rob Roy, have yet to strike a pedal, but have ground/scratched up the crank ends with bad pedal position going over obstacles (oops... beausage?). Seem to work nicely for me, I can still spin upto 120/130 usually no problem, higher than that is a rare effort
I have 170s on my Rob Roy, have yet to strike a pedal, but have ground/scratched up the crank ends with bad pedal position going over obstacles (oops... beausage?). Seem to work nicely for me, I can still spin upto 120/130 usually no problem, higher than that is a rare effort
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ATL
Posts: 163
Bikes: SS 29er Rigid, Kilo Stripper & Litespeed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anybody running 175's? I have a 35" inseam and I wonder if 170's would be long enough.
???
Any thoughts?
PF
???
Any thoughts?
PF
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760
Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
IRL Banhammer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: RVA
Posts: 664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ATL
Posts: 163
Bikes: SS 29er Rigid, Kilo Stripper & Litespeed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have some FSA Vero which are like 173.5 or some **** like that
I really want 165's to see what spinning is like w/ the shorter crank arms
I really want 165's to see what spinning is like w/ the shorter crank arms