Why?
#26
Spelling Snob
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 2,862
Bikes: Panasonic DX4000, Bianchi Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
It is fun, but if I were to say there were any advantages to riding fixed, they would be:
1-ease of maintenance
2-they're good for certain types of training.
3-you will be allowed on a velodrome track (as long as it is brakeless)
1-ease of maintenance
2-they're good for certain types of training.
3-you will be allowed on a velodrome track (as long as it is brakeless)
__________________
The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
#27
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I own fixed on a climb with a road bike, you guys are making **** up, because you can expend less energy climbing by utilizing gears while losing speed when raising your ratio means your road bike climbs better, wih your fixed it means you have no choice in the matter of how much energy you must expend.
This place spawns ignorance.
Less work to maintain - Check
Fun - Check
For track - Check
Other answers are reflecting yourr ignorance of cycling
This place spawns ignorance.
Less work to maintain - Check
Fun - Check
For track - Check
Other answers are reflecting yourr ignorance of cycling
Who’s ignorant?
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my personal experience I have found it easier to climb on a fixed-gear compared to a road bike with a similar gearing. In this case I believe it is because of the momentum - climbing at low cadences requires a lot of force on the pedals and generally results in sloppy pedal stroke. Not having to pedal through dead spots helps you maintain your rhythm which makes it easier to climb. However it is possible that this speculation is completely incorrect, as soft-pedalling through dead spots on a road bike would accomplish the same thing. It warrants more thorough experimentation/analysis.
However climbing in a large gear at low cadence is biomechanically less efficient than low-gear/high-cadence so a road bike is better at climbing than a fixed-gear with a typical gear ratio.
Of course fixed-gear drivetrains are more efficient at transmitting torque from the cranks to the wheel than a road bike, due to a lack of derailleur and a straight chainline. The difference in efficiency between a fixed-gear and a single speed is probably negligible.
As for weight, the lightest bike I own is a track bike (around 16lbs) but there are road bikes out there that weigh much less than that. Weight only makes a real difference when climbing so for general street use a light weight bike offers little advantage over a heavier bike, everything else being equal.
#30
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I disagree.
You are correct, if you are letting the cranks do the work for you, but if you are powering the cranks, any momentum is an energy benefit over a free-wheel at the same cadence.
#31
Ride simple.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colorado Mountains/New Mexico highlands
Posts: 381
Bikes: vitus 979, g fisher, specialized, trek, bridgestone rb1, Trek SS, Hiawatha SS, 54' Schwinn SS, Trek SS CX conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's a grand idea for ANOTHER bike.
It's soooooooooooo quiet.
It's soooooooooooo quiet.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In any case, if you are applying a relatively constant amount of force on the cranks during the entire rotation then your chain is staying taut, meaning that NO momentum is being transmitted from your rear wheel to your cranks.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I drew a little picture to explain what I mean about the taut chain (ph33r my MS Paint skillz):
pedalling:
Not pedalling:
Force is transmitted from the cranks to the wheel along the top part of the chain, force is transmitted from the wheel to the cranks along the bottom part of the chain. It's not possible for force to be transmitted along both at the same time (even with a perfectly tight chain, though it's easier to see with a slightly slack chain).
pedalling:
Not pedalling:
Force is transmitted from the cranks to the wheel along the top part of the chain, force is transmitted from the wheel to the cranks along the bottom part of the chain. It's not possible for force to be transmitted along both at the same time (even with a perfectly tight chain, though it's easier to see with a slightly slack chain).
#34
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, I haven't discovered free energy and I'm not talking thermodynamics. I'm talking experience, real world comparisons and undeniable conclusions.
Last edited by 667; 07-09-08 at 11:54 AM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
RE: my free energy comment.
If what you say is true, and the momentum supplied to your cranks from your rear wheel acts as an energy benefit over a freewheel, this means there is a net positive.
Now let's assume a completely zero loss environment here, in other words there is no resistance on your bike at all, it will continue to move forward forever. Ignoring the fact that if you are pedalling there is NO momentum supplied to your cranks from your rear wheel (as shown in my diagrams), the rear wheels momentum (the product of its mass and angular velocity) is transmitted to your cranks via the chain. You then supply power to the cranks, thereby increasing its momentum. This combined momentum is transmitted to your rear wheel, increasing its momentum. So far so good. However you imply that you get a benefit from the momentum that is transmitted from your rear wheel to your cranks and back. This means that if you don't pedal, the momentum in your cranks is going to somehow increase the momentum in your rear wheel.
Think about it - if you don't pedal when you have a freewheel, your cranks don't move. If you don't pedal on a fixed-gear, your cranks do move. You are implying that the moving of your cranks means you need to put less energy into the system to maintain your speed which means that the moving of your cranks is putting energy into your rear wheel (more than it is taking away). Obviously this is impossible - the energy that your cranks can put into your rear wheel cannot be greater than the energy put into them by the rear wheel in the first place.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here's the deal, a fixed-gear drive train is more efficient than a road bike drive train, all else being equal. It may be more efficient than a single speed due to the efficiency of the freewheel mechanism (I have not verified this, but it would make sense).
That alone can make a big difference. The momentum transferred to your cranks can make it easier to pedal if your pedal stroke is sloppy, but it doesn't make it more efficient.
It sounds to me like you are noticing that it is easier to pedal (especially uphill) on a fixed-gear because of the momentum carrying you through dead spots, and you are noticing the increased efficiency of the drivetrain. The problem is that you are attributing one to the other.
That alone can make a big difference. The momentum transferred to your cranks can make it easier to pedal if your pedal stroke is sloppy, but it doesn't make it more efficient.
It sounds to me like you are noticing that it is easier to pedal (especially uphill) on a fixed-gear because of the momentum carrying you through dead spots, and you are noticing the increased efficiency of the drivetrain. The problem is that you are attributing one to the other.
#37
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^ This is reasonable.
I can’t argue physics - im too much of a layman.
I guess I was touting the perceived benefits of fixed-gear biomechanics.
I can’t argue physics - im too much of a layman.
I guess I was touting the perceived benefits of fixed-gear biomechanics.
#39
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#40
-
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Banned in DC
Posts: 454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A fixed gear will climb slightly better on a hill that A) has a linear slope and B) has a slope that is in the proper torque range for your legs. A geared bike will climb better in the real world.
#41
K2ProFlex baby!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
Posts: 6,133
Bikes: to many to list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times
in
31 Posts
Preferance, its all about preferance, I know about six guys (myself included in the six) that tried fixed gear, everyone hated it but one. Does that make it suck? No, just means five guys in Philly didnt like it for whatever reason, but we all like single speeds including the one guy that likes fixed. (he now owns two bikes, one fixed and one single speed) its really as simple as that. Im sure youll hear this same story some day but in reverse
__________________
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just have more fun on mine. I haven't tried SS yet though, but riding fixed is more fun than riding with gears for me.
#43
K2ProFlex baby!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
Posts: 6,133
Bikes: to many to list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times
in
31 Posts
and thats what its all about, whats more fun for you Ill be god damned if Im going to ride a bike because everyone else tells me I should! No sheep here
__________________
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These "civilized" people...they'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster. I'm just ahead of the curve
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 866
Bikes: LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#45
hello
I don't find that to be true. I regularly ride two different bikes, one fixed and the other ss, geared identically, up the same hill every week. On the ss I can't tell the difference between that and the fixed gear when grinding up this hill. The fixed gear does not assist me in any way.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I built up a conversion for commuting and wet-season training. It's simple, reliable, and fun. Here's a training benefit: it broadens your power band. With a derailler bike you can choose the optimal gear for your speed and cadence. That's really the whole point, right? The thing is, you get used to riding in only the correct gear.
On a fixed gear, you're often in the "wrong gear." Maybe you're going down a decline or with a tailwind and you're in too low of a gear, maybe you're going up or into a headwind and you're in too high of a gear. With the former, your only choice is to spin it up; with the latter, to grind it out. Over many miles, your legs get used to spinning higher cadences at the top and pushing higher torque at the bottom.
Previously during a race or a group ride, if the pack suddenly accelerated I would have to drop a cog, stand up, and mash. After riding fixed, I can spin up to a higher cadence, remain seated, then drop a cog. Much smoother and faster acceleration. Or on rollers where I would previously gear down, now I have the low cadence power to stay in the big ring and power over the rollers. So that's a concrete benefit I have realized from riding fixed.
On a fixed gear, you're often in the "wrong gear." Maybe you're going down a decline or with a tailwind and you're in too low of a gear, maybe you're going up or into a headwind and you're in too high of a gear. With the former, your only choice is to spin it up; with the latter, to grind it out. Over many miles, your legs get used to spinning higher cadences at the top and pushing higher torque at the bottom.
Previously during a race or a group ride, if the pack suddenly accelerated I would have to drop a cog, stand up, and mash. After riding fixed, I can spin up to a higher cadence, remain seated, then drop a cog. Much smoother and faster acceleration. Or on rollers where I would previously gear down, now I have the low cadence power to stay in the big ring and power over the rollers. So that's a concrete benefit I have realized from riding fixed.
#48
:)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: duluth
Posts: 3,391
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Zen is easier to achieve with a fixed wheel.
....that and babes love my skidz.
....that and babes love my skidz.
#49
Bicyclerider4life
Thread Starter
Weight makes a big difference when going down the hill, too. Heavier bike = slower up hill and faster down hill
__________________
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
#50
The Neighbor of the Beast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 660
Bikes: Hardtail Mtn, Fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Try it right now with a penny and something substantially heavier (like a can of soup).