Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

42/13 ratio for fixed gear

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

42/13 ratio for fixed gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-08 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
Whilesryan's Avatar
Thread Starter
im not a newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: redlands california

Bikes: Nishiki fixed gear conversion, BCA old as **** custom mountain bike thing

42/13 ratio for fixed gear

how much wear will that put on the rear cog? and is that really good for mixed up and down hill ridding?
Whilesryan is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 09:50 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Stevens Point/Milwaukee, WI
thats 87.2 gear inches, pretty high. You'd be better off with a larger cog in the back as well.
42/15 would give you a good all-around gear.
matt wisconsin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 09:51 PM
  #3  
cc700's Avatar
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 4
From: seattle

Bikes: tirove

for hills that's just stupid.

38 13 or 42 17 is better.
cc700 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 09:52 PM
  #4  
NewYorkMantle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
in my opinion, 87.2 gear inches on a little cog isn't a good idea. 87.2 inches alone isn't a good idea.
NewYorkMantle is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 10:36 PM
  #5  
Whilesryan's Avatar
Thread Starter
im not a newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: redlands california

Bikes: Nishiki fixed gear conversion, BCA old as **** custom mountain bike thing

Originally Posted by cc700
for hills that's just stupid.

38 13 or 42 17 is better.
is it ok for just around town?
Whilesryan is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
NewYorkMantle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
for general riding, you're going to want to be somewhere between 75-80 gear inches.


Last edited by NewYorkMantle; 08-05-08 at 10:57 PM.
NewYorkMantle is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 11:20 PM
  #7  
spinerguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: SO-CAL

Bikes: Litespeed Teramo, Argon 18 Road, Fuji Mt Fuji Pro MTB, Fuji Track Pro FG, & Cannondale Quick CX Cross

As a reference I ride a 48x15 (86.4 gear inches) just fine in a mostly flat area. By no means I'm a strong rider just an experienced one.
spinerguy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 11:39 PM
  #8  
cc700's Avatar
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 4
From: seattle

Bikes: tirove

i ride 68 gear inches with a flop of 81 for fast flat riding.

i think 65 gear inches is good if you don't go fast or with traffic. especially if you have knee problems.
cc700 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-05-08 | 11:46 PM
  #9  
wallah's Avatar
Junior Mint
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: california

Bikes: Redline 925

I use 42 x 15 to ride to work each day and I ride comfortably at 18 to 20 mph. All flat.....short hills are doable, but definitely not a hill gear. My Cannondale Capo will be 50 x 14 for weekend club rides.
wallah is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 12:16 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
i do 52/17, but the city i go to school in is completely flat
Androo630 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 12:24 AM
  #11  
cc700's Avatar
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 4
From: seattle

Bikes: tirove

is it davis?
cc700 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-08 | 07:53 AM
  #12  
single&fixed
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Tracy, CA

Bikes: Windsdor Hour, Lugged Nishiki, Soft Ride fast TT w/650c wheels and a Specialized Allez Elite

48x18

I have a Windsor "Hour" - I am running 48x19 -I live in Nor Cal in the Central Valley -flat but VERY windy - I find 68 to 70 gear inches fine for most aplications. Once you get used to " spinning a bit" it is just fine for short hills and good for running down the road @ 18 mph or so. When head winds exceed 15 - 20 mph you will destroy your joints,(knees), by pushing too big a gear. It is not much fun either.
single&fixed is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-08 | 01:51 PM
  #13  
Whilesryan's Avatar
Thread Starter
im not a newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: redlands california

Bikes: Nishiki fixed gear conversion, BCA old as **** custom mountain bike thing

well i have 48 16 on my bike now so i guess thats good.
Whilesryan is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-08 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Tempe AZ

Bikes: Mondonico Road, Novaro Randonee Touring

At the risk of hijacking a thread - looking at what most of you run, it looks like you run somewhat lower cadence on your fixies than I do on my road bike. I haven't taken the plung on getting a fixie you but am about to... but should i assume a similar gearing to my road bike or should i gear up? For reference, I run 65" on flat ground at 18 MPH - a bit more if traffic is "pulling me along" [39-16 or 39-15])



I am tempted by the Hour or Messenger, so with the 48T ring, I would use a 20T cog - but that seems huge compared to what the rest of you use. Or, I could steal the 39T ring off my road bike to use with the 16T cog...



So what do you guys think? Do I just ride a higher cadence than most of you, or is there a difference going fixed?
TempeRider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-08 | 08:06 PM
  #15  
aMull's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto

Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17

There is a difference. I don't know if it's jsut me but i find it easier to push a high gear on a fixed than on a geared bike, especially on hills. 48/20 is a bit low, i am running 48/19 and sometimes find it low, but it's about perfect most of the time.
aMull is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 12:51 AM
  #16  
pissypaw's Avatar
Infantile member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Berlin
I started out on a 46/16 (77"), and that was way too low for a steep downhill. I find that I'd rather do it tough up a hill than spin out down a hill. I've just gotten a 46/13 (95") and it's heaven! It's like riding a V8. It's a bit too heavy on some of the really long uphills or the really steep uphills, but the fun it grants me on the flat and downhill makes it all worth it. Changing the sprocket is cheap and easy, so if you don't know what to go for, just start out at 80" and see if you need a smaller or bigger one.
pissypaw is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 01:18 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
48/17 on flatland is great (for me at least - near perfect).
bionnaki is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 08:23 AM
  #18  
aMull's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto

Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17

Originally Posted by pissypaw
I started out on a 46/16 (77"), and that was way too low for a steep downhill. I find that I'd rather do it tough up a hill than spin out down a hill. I've just gotten a 46/13 (95") and it's heaven! It's like riding a V8. It's a bit too heavy on some of the really long uphills or the really steep uphills, but the fun it grants me on the flat and downhill makes it all worth it. Changing the sprocket is cheap and easy, so if you don't know what to go for, just start out at 80" and see if you need a smaller or bigger one.
Not many run a monster gear like a 95. Can't imagine how starting froma stop must suck. If you're riding in an urban environment 95 is simply overkill. Spinning is much better on the knees than mashing. I do spin out pretty easy on the hills with my 68, but i have a front brake so it never bothers me.
aMull is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 08:34 AM
  #19  
huhenio's Avatar
Barbieri Telefonico
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,522
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Bikes: Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger

48x16 and i am saving my energy for 3 or 4 hills

anything steeper and i would go 48x18
__________________
Giving Haircuts Over The Phone
huhenio is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 09:19 AM
  #20  
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I guess it really depends on what you want out of riding.
I use mine for road and training and general fitness.
I try to ride moderate rollers avoiding long seep climbs.
We don't really do "flat" here in Switzerland.
I've mounted a front brake to assist on the steeper descents.

I ride a 42X17, and can for short intervals sustain about 36mph on the descents.
I find it a good 17-18mph cruising gear.
This is about as physically small gear set as I would use.
If I was buying a new set I would go with a 48/49X19.
BillyTKidd is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 11:24 AM
  #21  
throwintail's Avatar
shreddin'
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: RVA
46-15 or 46-16 for my fast bike. 39-17 for my screwing around bike. I like spinning downhill, anyone running above 90 for urban riding is either a veteran rider with massive legs or looks very silly taking off from a stop or climbing. I have heard that no matter what ratio you are trying for it is better to use the largest possible ring and cog combination to achieve it. This apparently makes a lot less stress on the whole drivetrain.
throwintail is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 03:02 PM
  #22  
Gordo789's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Ithaca, NY
I have been riding 46x16 out here in the hills, and it is maybe a little low when it comes to flat and slight declines, but I am glad I have it when I hit sustained uphills.
Gordo789 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 06:00 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pissypaw
I started out on a 46/16 (77"), and that was way too low for a steep downhill. I find that I'd rather do it tough up a hill than spin out down a hill. I've just gotten a 46/13 (95") and it's heaven! It's like riding a V8. It's a bit too heavy on some of the really long uphills or the really steep uphills, but the fun it grants me on the flat and downhill makes it all worth it. Changing the sprocket is cheap and easy, so if you don't know what to go for, just start out at 80" and see if you need a smaller or bigger one.
This is a track gear and is killer on your knees. While this may work great for you it is by no means a good starting point for other people. The general consensus as far as starting out is around 70 then move up or down as needed.
Jenkinsal2 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 06:13 PM
  #24  
Banned.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 1
From: on the moon

Bikes: Cinelli Mash

i need a larger rear cog. im at 48x15 and i ride in a mostly hilly area.
solbrothers is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-08 | 06:16 PM
  #25  
PanFry's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: ATL

Bikes: SS 29er Rigid, Kilo Stripper & Litespeed Road Bike

I am right on the cusp of stupidity with a 50t./16t. in Boulder, CO. Kinda strong... Mostly stupid.

PF
PanFry is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.