Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Does anyone here run a rear brake

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Does anyone here run a rear brake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-08 | 02:49 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
Originally Posted by Adam G.
Get rid of it. Braking power and stoppage ability comes all in the front.
I think this must be the most common and potentially dangerous misinterpretation of something Sheldon said.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-08 | 05:30 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Originally Posted by mander
I think this must be the most common and potentially dangerous misinterpretation of something Sheldon said.
During maximum braking, your rear wheel is unweighted and unable to provide any braking power. This is, of course, for a nice dry road going in a straight line. As others have pointed out, if the road is wet, especially during autumn, you risk having your front wheel slide out if you try and do this. On wet or icy roads, you need both brakes for max stopping power.

This is also true when you are going fast on a hard turn, which is why road bikes have both a front and rear brake. On a hard turn, you need to keep weight on both wheels so keep from sliding out.
Saint Alfonzo is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-08 | 05:51 PM
  #28  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

My 1955 Lenton has two brakes and runs fixed /fixed... having that second brake is good on long loaded descents as it can relieve the front brake and reduce heat buildup.

It essentially has three brakes.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-08 | 06:33 PM
  #29  
Live without dead time
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I have a rear brake and run fixed. Mostly it's because I like the added hand position of the brake hoods, so there's no reason to run a hood but not run a rear brake. I have yet to use the rear brake but it's there if for no other reason than to give my right side lever something to connect to.
elTwitcho is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-08 | 06:35 PM
  #30  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

My second lever on my bikes that only have one brake gets used to do things like activate my bell.

Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 10-18-08 | 06:55 PM
  #31  
Live without dead time
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Well I don't believe in bells, so nyah


That is pretty clever though
elTwitcho is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 04:59 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
Originally Posted by Saint Alfonzo
During maximum braking, your rear wheel is unweighted and unable to provide any braking power. This is, of course, for a nice dry road going in a straight line. As others have pointed out, if the road is wet, especially during autumn, you risk having your front wheel slide out if you try and do this. On wet or icy roads, you need both brakes for max stopping power.

This is also true when you are going fast on a hard turn, which is why road bikes have both a front and rear brake. On a hard turn, you need to keep weight on both wheels so keep from sliding out.

Yep, that's exactly what I was thinking of. When Sheldon says how 100% of braking power comes from the front brake, he restricts that statement to situations where you are stopping as fast as possible, in a straight line, on clean and dry pavement. But readers often seem to misinterpret him as meaning that you only need a front brake, period. So many times on these boards, I've seen someone who doesn't understand why you need a rear brake on a ss bike, because "all your braking power comes from the front". Again, this has to be the most common and potentially dangerous misinterpetation of Sheldon's words.

Last edited by mander; 10-19-08 at 05:06 AM.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 09:03 AM
  #33  
malpag3's Avatar
takin' it to the streets
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Denv-arrrgghhh

Bikes: 1999 Kona Kapu; late 70's/early 80's Araya road bike/commuter bike.

Yep I run two. It's a flip-flop hub, but I even use both of them when I'm running fixed. The horror!

Do what you want, but if you're running SS then yes, you really should run a front and rear brake (why doesn't anyone know how to spell brake?)
malpag3 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 09:48 AM
  #34  
c0urt's Avatar
moving target
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,952
Likes: 156
From: birmingham, al

Bikes: looks like a specialized crux now

I am probably going to add a rear, riding in seattle yesterday was pretty nutty.
and i destroyed a tire. plus the cars are a little more aggressive here
c0urt is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 11:15 AM
  #35  
Asymmetriad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also note that stopping takes much less effort when using both hands than when having to squeeze twice as hard with one hand. Obviously not when stopping quickly, but then I'm the kind of guy who stops for red lights at four-lane intersections
 
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.