Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

First day fixed...

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

First day fixed...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-08 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
<user defined text>
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia

Bikes: 80's peugeot. Somewhat knackered. Lovely new Salsa Casseroll singlespeed.

First day fixed...

So I've been riding SS for about a year on my daily commute. I have a Salsa Casseroll, and I love it.

At the weekend I finally got around to getting a fixed cog on the other side of the hub, and off I went into the (at first rather scary) world of fixed gear...

It is kinda fun, I guess, although I feel a bit vulnerable (I'm less confident about executing a sudden stop should it be required, and I'm still a bit cautious going around corners in case the pedal strikes).

It does make pedaling very smooth, though, especially going up hills.

It's set up with rather a high gear, however - I'm running 48/17 which feels rather high. It makes hill starts rather tricky; if i don't get clipped in on the first rotation of the pedals it gets a bit awkward...

I'm considering changing the chainring for a 42 (the 48/18 on the SS side has always felt a bit high, to be honest, given that Sydney has quite a few hills - climbing out of Coogee towards Bondi is kind of tough...). What you do reckon? Or should I just look out for 19 tooth cog for the fixed side?

Anyway, my first commute to work went without incident. Hopefully over the next week or so I'll get my 'fixie legs', and be able to get back up to full speed and be confident enough to eg trackstand at the lights (I didn't today as I was worried about not getting unclipped if it didn't work and doing the 'sprawl of shame').
trombone is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 03:40 PM
  #2  
NoneMoreBlack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
I wouldnt go all the way down to 42, you're gonna be WAY spinny that way... 44 would be a decent number to start with... Just my opinion.
NoneMoreBlack is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
Head Chief
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: kettering ohio

Bikes: Motobecane Messenger

44-46t is a good place to be. Gives nice versatility.
2new2this is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 04:03 PM
  #4  
roadfix's Avatar
hello
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,710
Likes: 136
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by 2new2this
44-46t is a good place to be. Gives nice versatility.
+1
roadfix is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
46/17 here, and i enjoy it!
Rafiki is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 05:13 PM
  #6  
NoneMoreBlack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rafiki
46/17 here, and i enjoy it!
Same thing I'm running. So far it seems like the magic gear.
NoneMoreBlack is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 05:29 PM
  #7  
get ill
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: sacramento

Bikes: fuji track

i'm looking at going 48 -17

pros and cons??
JoshG is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 05:43 PM
  #8  
Adam G.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
Congrats! hopefully you trashed your brakes, they will never be needed riding fixed. Go with 46X16 its a great ratio.
Adam G. is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
Thetank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JoshG
i'm looking at going 48 -17

pros and cons??
It's a tall gearing which is tough(er) on hills but I had that in my previous bike and it seemed decent enough for a flat enough city. I had a few hills to climb which weren't impossible just tougher. You will however have the benefit of not spinning like crazy when going down those very hills, and you'll have 17 skid patches too.
Thetank is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 06:14 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: PNW

Bikes: Older Raleigh Grand Prix

I have heard good things about 48/19 though I myself am running 40/16. Looking to get an odd number of teeth in the back so that I can have more skid patches.
klaxed is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
<user defined text>
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia

Bikes: 80's peugeot. Somewhat knackered. Lovely new Salsa Casseroll singlespeed.

Thanks for all the advice.

With regards to being too spinny, the odd thing is that when I'm riding my road bike I tend to leave it in a 39/17 combo most of the time, and am quite happy spinning. That said, I can see there is a difference between choosing to spin down a hill but having the option to change up or freewheel vs being stuck with it.

I can't see me trashing the brakes just yet (or ever, in fact). With the high ratio, it makes resisting the pedals to slow down quite hard work.

In terms of climbing hills, I can manage a high-ish ratio - I'm used to it from the SS side. But doing steep hill-starts is still my problem if I miss getting clipped in. It's bad anough on the SS; I think the fixie makes it worse (but might make it better, I suppose; I'll see over the coming days!)
trombone is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 08:38 PM
  #12  
bigbris1's Avatar
One skid from blown knees
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 913
Likes: 7
From: New York City
I started out on 48x15 & had to walk up most hills, just beginning again & all. Moved to 48x16 & it felt much better, skipping was much easier. Went to 48x17 for the patches, but found it spun more than I liked.

Currently riding 50x16, fast, but kind of tough on the knees, I can still skip it quite easily. Bought an EAI 17t cog which should straighten things out a bit.
bigbris1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-08 | 09:48 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR

Bikes: Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain

Originally Posted by klaxed
I have heard good things about 48/19 though I myself am running 40/16. Looking to get an odd number of teeth in the back so that I can have more skid patches.
Better make it quick. You've only got 1 now.
Scratcher33 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 06:33 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
"Trashing" the brake?
azukisingle is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 06:50 AM
  #15  
mangpress's Avatar
waste
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia

Bikes: work fix, play fix, dk 20", cruiser, ******* parts

another shrimp in the fixed gear barbie!
mangpress is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 06:53 AM
  #16  
Critical Jeff's Avatar
Permanent Beater Rider
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA

Bikes: Windsor Hour

Originally Posted by Adam G.
Congrats! hopefully you trashed your brakes, they will never be needed riding fixed. Go with 46X16 its a great ratio.
Don't listen to him. I would've gotten hit by a car this morning if it weren't for my front brake.
Critical Jeff is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 08:36 AM
  #17  
jpdesjar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
+1 on keeping the front brake and i have been riding 48x19 since riding fixed, it's a good ratio
 
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 08:52 AM
  #18  
middy's Avatar
Ketchup
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 464
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by Adam G.
Congrats! hopefully you trashed your brakes, they will never be needed riding fixed. Go with 46X16 its a great ratio.
Because chains never break and foot retention never fails.
middy is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-08 | 10:47 AM
  #19  
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: PNW

Bikes: Older Raleigh Grand Prix

Originally Posted by Scratcher33
Better make it quick. You've only got 1 now.
I am well aware of that fact. Just haven't had time to look around for different chainring/cog combos and how much they cost and what ratio that I want to run. This ratio that I am running currently is fine as I don't skid much unless it's wet and even then I don't really skid.
klaxed is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-08 | 12:07 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
<user defined text>
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia

Bikes: 80's peugeot. Somewhat knackered. Lovely new Salsa Casseroll singlespeed.

Just an update, for those interested.

I've now got my fixie legs established. The higher gearing is less of an issue than I thought; now I'm more confident I'm back to riding faster which keeps the cadence up reasonably well. There's a few big pulls on some uphill stretches, but so far they have been manageable. My fears about getting clipped in to a moving pedal have been quite unfounded; if anything it's a bit easier I reckon.

You do get used to the fixed thing, don't you? I went out on my other bike today, just to pop to the shop. I started slowing down, and my feet didn't go round as I expected. 'Crap! I've locked the back wheel!' was my instinctive thought as I released the brakes and quickly started pedalling again. Then I realised. 'Oh no, that's right, you don't have to pedal all the time...!'
trombone is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-08 | 12:17 AM
  #21  
Jabba Degrassi's Avatar
FNG
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON

Bikes: 2008 IRO Angus, 2008 Jamis Exile 29er

Originally Posted by Adam G.
Congrats! hopefully you trashed your brakes, they will never be needed riding fixed. Go with 46X16 its a great ratio.
Let's make a deal. You stop trying to convince people to ride brakeless and we'll stop arguing with you about it.

It's his FIRST DAY riding fixed for f*ck sake. Where's your brain?
Jabba Degrassi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-08 | 01:17 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA

Bikes: 50cm Kilo TT

I used to ride 48/16 on my stock Kilo TT. Everytime I try a hill, i feel like dying. But today, i put on a 19t surly cog in the back and the quickness of the bike is absolutely superb. I havent tried any downhill runs yet, so I don't about the spinning yet but that's why I have brakes.

oh, and its a ******ed idea to take off the front brakes if you already have them on. IMO
Ravuthpum is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-08 | 01:34 AM
  #23  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 150
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

A Public Service Message From Your Uncle Sixty on Braking
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-08 | 09:28 AM
  #24  
jpdesjar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Ravuthpum
I used to ride 48/16 on my stock Kilo TT. Everytime I try a hill, i feel like dying. But today, i put on a 19t surly cog in the back and the quickness of the bike is absolutely superb. I havent tried any downhill runs yet, so I don't about the spinning yet but that's why I have brakes.

oh, and its a ******ed idea to take off the front brakes if you already have them on. IMO
48x19 is not a bad ratio for downhills...i do spin quite a bit but it's controllable
 
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.