question from a non-FG/SS guy
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,134
Likes: 192
From: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
question from a non-FG/SS guy
this is a genuine question, not trying to start a flame war or anything. i don't hang out in FG/SS and i have no desire to ride FG but i've been wanting to know this for some time:
is there a specific term to describe when FG riders balance themselves at stoplights by pedaling forward/backward with the fork turned?
next, why do they do it for extended periods of time? i can sort of understand why you might want to do it for a second or two at a stop sign instead of dropping a foot to the ground, but to be honest, it appears painful and awkward to see guys doing it for like 30 seconds at a time at a stoplight.
from an aesthetic perspective, i see it constantly and IMHO it is not the most flattering pose a person can make on two wheels. it comes off as nervous and precarious as opposed to calm and stable.
from a technical standpoint, one of the arguments for FG is that it allows much more efficient energy transfer from the person to the ground, yet this seems negated by the fact that this little balancing act is certainly less efficient than just stopping and putting a foot on the ground.
again, not trying to come off as an FG hater, i really want some enlightenment here.
is there a specific term to describe when FG riders balance themselves at stoplights by pedaling forward/backward with the fork turned?
next, why do they do it for extended periods of time? i can sort of understand why you might want to do it for a second or two at a stop sign instead of dropping a foot to the ground, but to be honest, it appears painful and awkward to see guys doing it for like 30 seconds at a time at a stoplight.
from an aesthetic perspective, i see it constantly and IMHO it is not the most flattering pose a person can make on two wheels. it comes off as nervous and precarious as opposed to calm and stable.
from a technical standpoint, one of the arguments for FG is that it allows much more efficient energy transfer from the person to the ground, yet this seems negated by the fact that this little balancing act is certainly less efficient than just stopping and putting a foot on the ground.
again, not trying to come off as an FG hater, i really want some enlightenment here.
#2
the term is "trackstand." it comes from the use of that technique during match sprints. youtube will have examples for you to watch.
i trackstand at lights because if i'm looking to make a quick gap, i have to be ready to ride for it. if i first have to get my feet in the pedals and my arse up on to the saddle, i won't be able to do it.
and because of vanity. if anybody says otherwise they're lying.
also, it's not just fixed gear riders. lots of roadies do it too. i do it on my road bike.
i trackstand at lights because if i'm looking to make a quick gap, i have to be ready to ride for it. if i first have to get my feet in the pedals and my arse up on to the saddle, i won't be able to do it.
and because of vanity. if anybody says otherwise they're lying.
also, it's not just fixed gear riders. lots of roadies do it too. i do it on my road bike.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
It's called trackstanding. And i do it because it's fun mostly. Not sure why you think it looks awkward though, it's nt like i'm flailing my arms or being all over the place. I put my foot on the ground when i mess up the trackstand either on entry or by losing balance.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
From: ABQ, NM
Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot
It is called a trackstand. You can do it on a geared bike too.
I trackstand, actually I prefer to sit, as I run clips and straps around town and I like to run them tight so it is a pain to reach down and unstrap and then tighten my straps again so I prefer to do a trackstand instead.
If you run across people who are good at trackstands movement is almost impereceptible, but those riders are seen less as FG riding is very popular and there are a lot of people who have not mastered some of the FG skills.
Try it on your geared bike sometime, easiest to do on a slight incline, and you might gain a better appreciation for it.
I trackstand, actually I prefer to sit, as I run clips and straps around town and I like to run them tight so it is a pain to reach down and unstrap and then tighten my straps again so I prefer to do a trackstand instead.
If you run across people who are good at trackstands movement is almost impereceptible, but those riders are seen less as FG riding is very popular and there are a lot of people who have not mastered some of the FG skills.
Try it on your geared bike sometime, easiest to do on a slight incline, and you might gain a better appreciation for it.
#9
everyday I'm hustlin'
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck, Surly Steamrolla
Yeah, vanity is definitely involved. But it definitely proves practical a lot of times. It's just one of those rites of passage when riding fixed, I guess.
With clips and clipless pedals alike, I just find it a lot faster to trackstand for a bit, then jump the light or make my turn, rather than trying to scramble back into your clips or to clip in. I mean, I'm sure it's not that big of a deal getting into your pedals, I just think it's faster.
usually when it's a long light, it's not worth the effort to stay on your bike the entire time. my 2 cents.
But yes, I've seen roadies to it too.
With clips and clipless pedals alike, I just find it a lot faster to trackstand for a bit, then jump the light or make my turn, rather than trying to scramble back into your clips or to clip in. I mean, I'm sure it's not that big of a deal getting into your pedals, I just think it's faster.
usually when it's a long light, it's not worth the effort to stay on your bike the entire time. my 2 cents.
But yes, I've seen roadies to it too.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 413
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield, CA
Bikes: '72 peugeot PX10
next, why do they do it for extended periods of time? i can sort of understand why you might want to do it for a second or two at a stop sign instead of dropping a foot to the ground, but to be honest, it appears painful and awkward to see guys doing it for like 30 seconds at a time at a stoplight.
You ever see a kid in the park doing a handstand? Not very comfortable. Kind of odd looking but it's fun.
You ever drink a bunch of beer?
You ever ride a bike in the rain?
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
From: Athens, Ohio
Bikes: Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki
for me trackstanding gets really hard after like 10 seconds so if the light hasn't turned i end up just putting my foot down.
Last edited by dayvan cowboy; 12-28-08 at 07:03 PM.
#15
I agree that excessively long trackstanding is kind of silly and a waste of energy. Trackstanding can be super fun though. I love the moment when I reach a place of balance and I think to myself "I've got it, I am solidly balanced." It's a nice feeling.
#16
#17
epilepsy advocate
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: wichita kansas
Bikes: Specialized Rockhopper, Cannondale touring bike, Cannondale Black Lightning and a Cannondale Capo.
I find track standing easier on my road bike as well. Maybe its because I have been riding road bikes for over twenty years and have only been riding track for a few years. I do it because it is key to getting a jump on traffic when the light goes green.
There are certain lights in town that I will not track stand at because I know they have a long cycle to go through before I get a green again. But then even here in Kansas people are pretty impressed sometimes when you can sit there at a red light and never put a foot down.
There are certain lights in town that I will not track stand at because I know they have a long cycle to go through before I get a green again. But then even here in Kansas people are pretty impressed sometimes when you can sit there at a red light and never put a foot down.
#19
in grind we crust
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: brooklyn and anywhere
Bikes: de rosa prestige 1982 track, de rosa prestige 1982 road, olmo team 1985 road, hoffy track, faggin track, 1981 bianchi piaggio track, d'accordi road, bob jackson singlespeed
it shouldn't be a lot of effort, really.
and it looks awkward because for a lot of people just learning, it is.
but i mean, after a while it just sorta becomes second nature. and as mattio pointed out - it's way easier to get going quickly from a trackstand than it is when you have your foot down.
and it looks awkward because for a lot of people just learning, it is.
but i mean, after a while it just sorta becomes second nature. and as mattio pointed out - it's way easier to get going quickly from a trackstand than it is when you have your foot down.
#20
oh stephen, i hollered at you in williamsburg a couple weeks ago, from the inside of a car. i was a little bit out of sorts though and didn't think to roll the window down. you were t-standin' at, like, n7th and driggs or bedford or something. talkin' on a cell phone.
#22
:)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 1
From: duluth
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450






