Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

langster or bd bike??

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

langster or bd bike??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-09 | 01:57 AM
  #1  
lmaonade's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
langster or bd bike??

well im about to pull the trigger and buy a bike (finally ) but yeah...my choices are either get a langster frame and build it up or just buy a complete bd bike...probably the windsor hour or messenger, since they are out of stock in my size...if i were to get the langster, i would get a pretty good deal on it, but it would be a bit more pricey than buying a bd bike...gahh i dunno

any suggestions on the matter?
lmaonade is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 02:15 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, OR

Bikes: Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain

Langster! You'll appreciate it sooooo much more, if you build it yourself!
Scratcher33 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 02:36 AM
  #3  
mickey_'s Avatar
So tragically hip.
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: MASHboro, NJ

Bikes: 2009 SE Premium Brew, 2001 GT Interceptor, 2010 Motobecane Fantom 29

My Windsor Clockwork from BD is of surprisingly high quality. Granted, my previous ride was a 10-speed that my dad bought from Sears during the Ford administration, but I don't think you'll be disappointed with a BD bike. You can still do a decent amount of "building" yourself; I slapped on a 17t Surly track cog and I'm in the process of swapping in some handlebars from one of my old bikes. You'll essentially be getting an SE Lager for the price of a Wal-Mart bike.
mickey_ is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 03:03 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
No me gusta el langster.
philos is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 03:25 AM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 1
From: on the moon

Bikes: Cinelli Mash

theres lots of langster hate here, and you cant go wrong with the messenger or hour bikes. IMO, build it if you are willing to spend more just to say you built it. otherwise get the messenger or hour.
solbrothers is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 04:41 AM
  #6  
carleton's Avatar
Elitist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,966
Likes: 94
From: Atlanta, GA
My vote would be for the langster assuming that you have the patience to wait and the money to spend, being that you will likely upgrade some of the BD bike's parts over time anyway.

Don't listen to people who talk trash about Langsters. It's a great bike and what's more important is that what works for you works for you. The same people talked trash about the Trek T1 style...which seems to work fine for some dude named Larry Armstrong...or is it Lance?



https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/507994-lance-armstrong-s-training-bike.html
carleton is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 04:42 AM
  #7  
bigvegan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Bikes Direct. They're the same entry level bikes offered by other labels for a couple hundred bucks off.

Building up a bike from a frame is fun, but it adds up pretty quick. I bought an old Schwinn steel frame for $20 at the local bike collective, did the math, bought the Messenger on BD, and it's been an OUTSTANDING bike (for what it is, a solid basic chromoly steel fixie). Then, since I like to tinker, I went back and started buying parts for the Schwinn. (The $20 frame is turning into a $500ish build, because when you want something that reflects your taste (or lack thereof), you tend to get picky.)

Also, the Langster is aluminum, and has a more compact style rame, while most of the BD bikes are traditional geometry steel frames, which tend to be preferred by a lot of the Tarck crowd.

Buy the bike that you can afford that will make you happy.
bigvegan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 05:50 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
I'm partial, I love the aesthetic look of a traditional lugged track frame. Slight deviations from it I can handle. Thick ass alum frames just don't do it for me. In no way or form am I saying they are an inferior bike, cause that's crap. Specialized and Trek make good bikes, but if I was to hop on to this kinda style, I would get a Bianchi concept or Fuji track pro...

Get a/or: 1) Kilo TT Frame 2) IRO frame or complete 3) This is my all time favorite, because it is what enabled me to get a completely built up Bareknuckle for $650 - sift through ebay and craigslist.

...Please give ebay and craigslist a chance, you'll congratulate yourself later.
philos is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 09:27 AM
  #9  
stryper's Avatar
I just wanna ride
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 1
From: Chico Califo

Bikes: 2013 BMC Impec

My advice is to get which ever you think will make you happy, price aside. If a bd bike will do that then great, save the extra cash and have a blast on a good bike. But if you are like a lot of us here then nothing beats the satisfaction of building up your own bike just the way you want it (I would know since I just finished building mine after months of waiting).

If you can't afford it that is one thing, but if you can afford and have the know how and tools (or access to them), then build it yourself. And if you the desire to build it yourself without spending as much, then get the kilo tt frame by itself from bikeisland.

As far as looks go, check this langster, it's my fav so far, I love the bars on it:
stryper is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 11:08 AM
  #10  
Alex Steezeman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
That's my bike! I'm glad you like it.

I don't really know about comparing these two bikes as I've only had a Langster, but it's done me well so far and all the stock components are still up and running. The only stuff I changed was stuff I got for cheap or free, aside from the bars.
Alex Steezeman is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 04:54 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
If you want to end up with a lightweight build, start with the Langster. You drop over a pound (maybe even 2, I have not seen frame weights on the Windsor) on the frame alone, and its really expensive to drop that much weight on components.

If you could care less about the end weight, and want a budget built that you can ride right away, obviously get the BD bike.

I have built many bikes up from the frame, but always had a nice bike to ride while I was building. If it was my only bike, it would get annoying really quick to have most of the bike and still not be able to ride it.

I have a Langster for full disclosure.
Hirohsima is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Central CA

Bikes: A little of everything

Seconding the fact that the Langster is really, really light. Its not as 'track' as some other fixed-gears- its more of a fixed-gear road bike.

I ended up selling the frame, as the one I bought was a little large for me, but I kept all of the components and still carry them over to new frames.
Raiden is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 06:05 PM
  #13  
lmaonade's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
first and foremost, thanks for everyones insight and comments but i think im just gonna go with the bd bike, specifically the kilo tt since its my size is now on pre-order
i would have loved to go with the langster and build it up, but with my current budget, i think the kilo tt is my best bet~
lmaonade is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 07:01 PM
  #14  
erichsia's Avatar
thread derailleur
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 1
From: beyond Thunderdome

Bikes: 82 Bianchi ECO Pista, Pake, Kilo TT, some *** bmx i found underneath an old house

One last thing to take into consideration is aluminum v.s. steel. Not that there aren't ways to dampen the harshness of aluminum, or that there isn't anyone riding the streets on aluminum frames, cause there are & there is. But steel is generally considered to be the more forgiving of the two, providing a smoother ride on city streets. Aluminum is stiffer and lighter, but that can translate negatively when your dropping off curbs or riding over potholes/buckled pavement/any sort of city environment. Langsters are aluminum, while the hour & messenger are steel.
erichsia is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-09 | 07:07 PM
  #15  
carleton's Avatar
Elitist
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,966
Likes: 94
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by erichsia
One last thing to take into consideration is aluminum v.s. steel. Not that there aren't ways to dampen the harshness of aluminum, or that there isn't anyone riding the streets on aluminum frames, cause there are & there is. But steel is generally considered to be the more forgiving of the two, providing a smoother ride on city streets. Aluminum is stiffer and lighter, but that can translate negatively when your dropping off curbs or riding over potholes/buckled pavement/any sort of city environment. Langsters are aluminum, while the hour & messenger are steel.
But climbing using a bike that has a stiff aluminum rear triangle is amazing. 100% of your energy goes to the ground. No mushy mushy.
carleton is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.