Question about Gear Ratio
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Question about Gear Ratio
is 42T - 17T a bad combination of gearing? i recently just purchased a flip flop hub wheelset and it came with a 17t cog.
i live in SF but the route i go to don't have much hills. (give or take a few)
is this good for overall riding?
thanks!
ken
i live in SF but the route i go to don't have much hills. (give or take a few)
is this good for overall riding?
thanks!
ken
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
You might find it a bit limiting on the flats. As in you'll have to spin like a human blender to go any faster than 20mph.
But generally speaking, I think you're better off going a bit low than a bit high.
But generally speaking, I think you're better off going a bit low than a bit high.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,779
Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The thing is that a low gear good for climbing usually sucks for descending So as roadfix said you need to find a compromise that works best for you and where you ride.
Last edited by aMull; 02-10-09 at 05:17 PM.
#8
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
Cogs are cheaper than chainrings. If the 17 is too low, get the 16. Or a 15. Keep the 17 for when you want to climb.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I live in SF too, and I ride 48/17 and it's good for going up hills (took about a week of riding to get used to climbing at that ratio) but it sucks for downhills (spinning quite a bit, which I guess is alright because I ride brakeless, so it's easy to control my speed) and flats are somewhere in between good and bad (average?).
I guess I'd suggest a little higher of a ratio, but give it a week or two to figure out what you need for your riding conditions.
I guess I'd suggest a little higher of a ratio, but give it a week or two to figure out what you need for your riding conditions.
#10
hello
We have no idea how fit the OP is. We can suggest gear ratios but we have no idea if he's a skinny 120 pounder or a fat 250 pounder. I think the stock 42-17 is a good starter gear and he can determine which way to go after a few rides.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
[QUOTE=roadfix;8339993]We have no idea how fit the OP is. We can suggest gear ratios but we have no idea if he's a skinny 120 pounder or a fat 250 pounder. I think the stock 42-17 is a good starter gear and he can determine which way to go after a few rides.[/QUOTE
i would say im fairly fit, based on the index haha. with 42/17 gearing i just notice i pedal a lot.
i would say im fairly fit, based on the index haha. with 42/17 gearing i just notice i pedal a lot.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I prefer 42/15 or 42/16. That is borderline granny gear, but in a hilly city it may be perfect. Like they all said, ride it until you figure it out.