Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Brakeless gear ratio???

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Brakeless gear ratio???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-09 | 12:30 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Brakeless gear ratio???

I recently made a bike and I currently have a 46 front and 17 back gear and well I was wondering what your gear ratio is front and back cogs?? any advise
I was think of eithar getting 19 for the back or keeping the 17 and changing the front one to 44 I wanna be able to do sitting skids but not sure if maybe what I have now is to high or do I just need practice I can lock up the back wheel for like a second and If i dont do right I really hurt me knees.
manuelche3434 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 12:34 PM
  #2  
anemptygun's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: time of legends

Bikes: nishiki rally

I am in the same position as you. I don't know the answer, but I would like to hear if someone else knows...
anemptygun is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 12:59 PM
  #3  
SpaceFace's Avatar
∞mpg
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Austin via Houston

Bikes: Nishiki Riviera GT and a Sparton

46/16 on the flip and 46/17 on the flop. I used the 16 as a starting point to kind of build up leg muscle and work on slowing down without skidding. When I finally got skidding down on the 16 tooth cog switching to the 17 was cake.

I live in Austin and there are small rolling hills and only a few minor climbs that I have to mildly attack, so the 17 tooth cog works for me. It also gives me 17 skid patches. When I skid I do very minimal lifting from my saddle, nothing at all close to those nuts to stem guys (which is not all that good for stopping anyway).

I would highly recommend a front brake. I have a front brake and today was the first time I've really used it in something like 3 months of it being on. A driver was paying no attention and drove into my lane. I would have ate some serious **** cause skidding wouldn't have bailed me out of that one.

I say you should keep with 46/17. Develop a little muscle and you should get the hang of skidding with a minimal amount of your ass off of your saddle. Then you could go for the 19 and it is going to be way too easy to skid.
SpaceFace is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 01:03 PM
  #4  
monster
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 756
Likes: 1
From: NYC
I ride 46x17 brakeless and I dig it.
I don't go around skidding all over the place to stop.
Skips and back pressure to stop, skids for just screwin around.
monsterkidz is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 01:19 PM
  #5  
anemptygun's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: time of legends

Bikes: nishiki rally

Thank you, that helps a lot.
anemptygun is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 02:20 PM
  #6  
4zn_balla's Avatar
is actually asian
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI

Bikes: Leader

48/15 . it doesn't matter what ratio you ride
4zn_balla is offline  
Reply
Old 03-11-09 | 02:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 159
Likes: 0

Bikes: 2001 Bianchi Eros, 1976 Orbea conversion

I started out 46/16 and it kicked my ass for a while. Once I could manage myself on that ratio, picked up a 17t cog and ride full brakeless. Its perfect.
Yaktizzle417 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 02:28 AM
  #8  
grymg's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, CA
Used to ride 48/17, now I ride 46/17 and love it.

Lots of skid patches and not too spinny on the downhills.
grymg is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 09:45 AM
  #9  
RichPugh's Avatar
Nymphomaniactionhero
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 496
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore, MD

Bikes: 07' Specialized Langster Comp, 04' Bianchi Pista Concept

Me:
Langster Comp is 49x16.
Surly Steamroller is 47x16.
This should mean nothing to you.

Technical term for the "front cog" is Chainring.

Brakeless gear ratios are the same as gear ratios with brake(s).

Gear Ratios are seldom used to compare. The common unit of measurement to dictate gearing is your "Gear Inches". Gear inches are the number of inches you move with every 1 full rotation of the crank. You should use THIS calculator and play around with it. A lower GI will be easier to accelerate (and decelerate) with, therefore will be easier to skid with but will require faster pedaling to maintain the same speed of that of a higher GI. A higher GI will be more difficult to skid but will allow you higher speeds at a lower pedaling rpm (aka Cadence) than that of a lower GI.

It's a person preference what ratio (i.e., what combination of chainring/cog) you run. If youre entire criteria is based on seated skids, you either need to go to the gym and beef up those stems and learn them with the ratio you are currently running OR lower your gear inches by going with a larger cog and smaller chainring. This in turn multiplies (or divides depending on how you calculate it) the torque between the crank and the rear wheel allowing you to exert less force to lock up that back wheel.

Review:
Chainring = front
Cog = rear
The closer you get the number of teeth between the Chainring and the Cog = lower gear inches, i.e., 44x19 is lower GI than 49x16.(Technically, the ratio between the cog/chainring dictates GI but nobody runs smaller chainrings than cogs in practical applications).
Higher gear inches = harder to skid.
Lower gear inches = easier to skid.

Now go practice!

Last edited by RichPugh; 03-16-09 at 10:19 AM.
RichPugh is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 09:50 AM
  #10  
jtarver's Avatar
Rumblefish
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Austin Texas

Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport

I have yet to see a truly seated skid on dry pavement, so don't feel like you're gearing is preventing it. It's physics that prevents it. I could be wrong, any video of a skid initiated while maintaining contact between seat and ass?
jtarver is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 12:32 PM
  #11  
4zn_balla's Avatar
is actually asian
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI

Bikes: Leader

Originally Posted by jtarver
I have yet to see a truly seated skid on dry pavement, so don't feel like you're gearing is preventing it. It's physics that prevents it. I could be wrong, any video of a skid initiated while maintaining contact between seat and ass?
i used to be able to do it with 48/17 but now i can't with 48/15. It depends on chain stretch, and tire wear. it was cause i had just gotten a new chain and my tire was pretty slick. I also couldn't do it if i had a bag on or anything extra other than my body
4zn_balla is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 03:28 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN

Bikes: 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport Conversion

42/18. skidding is siiimple.
theryanmeyer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 04:16 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
46/17. Works great on the hilly UCSC campus. However, I'm thinking of dropping down to 46/18 for easier climbing. Do whatever works for you.
nerdbot5000 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 06:25 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 159
Likes: 0

Bikes: 2001 Bianchi Eros, 1976 Orbea conversion

I love my 46/17 (this my second post in the thread bahaha)

I'm an ambidextrous skidder on every type of skids (trick/seated/hop/you know what I'm getting at) so I've got a **** ton of skid patches. I live in a windy and hilly area and its perfect. I can still play with traffic without spinning out like hella. Best ratio I've ridden. (although I've ridden only 4ish others)
Yaktizzle417 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 08:41 PM
  #15  
ModernDivo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC

Bikes: Cypress track bike

Originally Posted by RichPugh
. Gear inches are the number of inches you move with every 1 full rotation of the crank.
I thought gear inches were a measure of how big a wheel you would have on a penny farthing bike with the same gear ratio
ModernDivo is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 09:46 PM
  #16  
adriano's Avatar
*
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,876
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Originally Posted by RichPugh
The common unit of measurement to dictate gearing is your "Gear Inches". Gear inches are the number of inches you move with every 1 full rotation of the crank.
wow, i surely hope not!
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-09 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
bboysubhuman's Avatar
Señor Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Philly
It was originally the diameter of the penny farthing's wheel--which goes around once with each crank rotation. So the distance traveled in one rotation is actually the circumference of the wheel. The use of two gears makes a bike with smaller wheels go the same distance. But the distance is not the gear inches. My bike is the equivalent of a 73 inch wheel on a penny farthing, which travels 19ft in one rotation.

Correct me if this is wrong. I got confused writing that because I just figured it out in my head.
bboysubhuman is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-09 | 12:25 AM
  #18  
calf man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Atascadero, CA
Gear inches is actually the distance you would travel with one crank rotation divided by pi.

ie: for a 27" diameter wheel, a 45 tooth chain ring, and a 15 tooth cog . . .

Circumfrence = 27" x pi
Ratio = 3:1
Distance traveled in one rotation = 27" x pi x 3 = 81" x pi
Gear inches = 81"

It is intended to equate the diameter of the old penny farthing to modern bikes.
calf man is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-09 | 10:11 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Philly
I ride 48/16 and have no problem skidding if I need to stop quickly. It really depends on how strong your muscles get. When I first started I could barely do it with 46/16, had to really put my crotch to the bars to be able to skid, but after riding a year or so, I can skid seated with my current ratio.
jimmk is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-09 | 10:33 AM
  #20  
Meepers's Avatar
ECR
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 601
Likes: 1
From: Scranton, PA

Bikes: Bianchi Pista/Fuji Nevada/Windsor Clockwork

i ride 46/17. i can skid sitting down, and ride up the big hills to get to my apartment. there are like 34 skid patches if you can "go both ways."
Meepers is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-09 | 10:36 AM
  #21  
Street Pharmacist
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: the yay
skidding in a 46x17 is easy (that's my gearing). To do seated skids "better" you just need to practice your technique.
Pennywize is offline  
Reply
Old 03-17-09 | 11:13 AM
  #22  
RichPugh's Avatar
Nymphomaniactionhero
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 496
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore, MD

Bikes: 07' Specialized Langster Comp, 04' Bianchi Pista Concept

Sorry, thanks for clearing up the gear inches stuff. I left quite a bit out. My mistake. I didnt mean to say if you had a gear inch of 80, you would only travel 80" with one rotation of the crank LOL... I meant to convey the higher GI, the further you would move with one rotation of the cranks, and lower GI, the less... I simplified it a bit too far for the OP.

Gear inches = drive wheel diameter x chainring teeth / rear cog teeth.

i.e., If your bike has a Gear Inch measurement of 80, one turn of the pedals moves the bicycle the distance equal to the circumference of an 80" wheel.

Last edited by RichPugh; 03-17-09 at 11:30 AM.
RichPugh is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.