Horizontal dropouts vs true track frame
#26
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
The other option is of course to add spacers to the hub. Having a straight chainline is important, but that can easily be adjusted by spacing the hub or using a different BB length.
Even if you do decide to respace the frame, cold-setting the steel is not too tough. I wouldn't try it on an aluminum frame, though.
Even if you do decide to respace the frame, cold-setting the steel is not too tough. I wouldn't try it on an aluminum frame, though.
Also in terms of 700 c vs 27 inch my conversion is 27 inch and I use 700 c wheels. Sng makes dual pivot long reach breaks that are perfect.
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
#28
Starting off hard in a low gear (on a geared bike) yields less stress on the dropouts and stays than starting off hard on a fixed, higher geared, track bike. Thus track dropouts are thicker than road dropouts.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
#29
Well, if my brawny 160 lb physique manages to tear a road horizontal dropout to pieces, I'll be sure to post photos here 
Anyone have better ideas than craigslist for the frame? Seems like most on there are BIG and I need a 56 cm or equivalent.

Anyone have better ideas than craigslist for the frame? Seems like most on there are BIG and I need a 56 cm or equivalent.
#31
I did say that "it can be kinda a hassle if you have to bend them in/space your wheel" although I guess hub is the right term. You're also definitely right about bb length adjustments, although there can be issues with bb's that are too short to accommodate the chainring on a ss crankset. And I definitely agree about not bending in aluminum drops. .
Of course if your lazy, and you have a nutted axle, you don't even need to respace, you can just tighten down the frame on the hub. It'll take a bit more work to tighten the track nuts than usual, but nothing a decent 15mm can't handle.
Trust me, I've done both, both work, and neither of them impacts chainline.
#32
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
80's Japanese bikes like Miyata, Nishiki, Panasonic, Bridgestone are undervalued right now, except for the high end stuff. I snagged a nice Miyata with butted chromoly, complete bike, for $40 for a friend.
Horizontal dropouts stayed around till the mid-90s; 700c wheels became common in the early 80's so you've got a good time window of quality frames with both.
Garage sales are your best bet for an inexpensive bike. Or thrift stores if you live in a large city and can visit the stores on a daily basis to find a bike. Flippers lurk everywhere to snag the good deals then throw them up on CL or eBay so you have to act fast.
Simply convert the 56cm to inches(divide by 2.54).
Italian bottom brackets are still being made; it's the French bottom bracket and the Raleigh 26tpi bottom brackets you got to be careful with. If you've got the original bottom bracket cups and spindle you can make it work, if not, a replacement is hard to find.
Look for dropouts that are forged or at least stamped from heavy gauge steel. Dropouts held in place by crimping the stays I don't mess with but I see plenty of people riding on them.
#36
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
#37
Vello Kombi, baby

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,188
Likes: 16
From: Je suis ici
Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10
Austrian, actually. Puch/Damlier/Steyr. Conglomerate that also makes/made cars and firearms, partially in Germany (hence the confusion). English thread, made some real beauties under the Austro-Damlier brand, which I likely just mis-spelled and mangled. Decent stuff, that one looks to be entry level.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
#39
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
You are wrong. Mashing a big gear stresses the cranks and bottom bracket a lot, but mashing a little gear confers mechanical advantage and so by the time the force is transferred to the dropouts, it winds up being greater (other things being equal). This is why you can accelerate faster in a low gear. I think there's more to the explanation than this, but that, I hope, is the basic truth. Newtonian physics as applied to bikes is actually a bit tricky for me to grasp.
Last edited by mander; 04-15-09 at 05:53 PM.
#40
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Alaska/Oregon
Bikes: Klein Palmino, Litespeed Sienna
I'd pick up that frame, Austrian=cool points, also it isn't super flashy=not stolen
150 is insane though, I paid 90 shipped for my Panasonic Sports Deluxe, structurally perfect, some chips/nicks, and the paint was faded. It's yellow, so the faded paint looks awesome. It's getting pin striped right now by a friend to give a little custom touch, then it gets turned into my new commuter.
Panasonic frames are great, just a no frills frame, down to brass tacks
#41
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
For the whole "stress on the dropouts" argument. It's bull.
Simply put, F=ma and you can accelerate faster with a lower gear, your mass isn't changed, and friction etc. stays the same from a fixed to geared bike, so only your acceleration is changing, therefore a greater force.
More scientifically, we get into torques which involve the length of the cranks, the force exerted by a track rider compared to a road rider, the difference in bikes mass etc. It gets complicated, but any way you put it, there is more force with a smaller gear ratio. Why do you think cars break their differentials when gunning it off a line because of too much torque... low end torque that fixed gears don't have.
Simply put, F=ma and you can accelerate faster with a lower gear, your mass isn't changed, and friction etc. stays the same from a fixed to geared bike, so only your acceleration is changing, therefore a greater force.
More scientifically, we get into torques which involve the length of the cranks, the force exerted by a track rider compared to a road rider, the difference in bikes mass etc. It gets complicated, but any way you put it, there is more force with a smaller gear ratio. Why do you think cars break their differentials when gunning it off a line because of too much torque... low end torque that fixed gears don't have.
#42
I got an offer, very good price on this bike. It is a trek 400, based on my research it is from early 90s. Seems to have horizontal dropouts, they're just a bit short looking.
I also may be able to get ahold of a bridgestone rb-t frame. Very good price offer there too.
Any opinions on either?
I also may be able to get ahold of a bridgestone rb-t frame. Very good price offer there too.
Any opinions on either?






