Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

SOMA Rush Vs. FELT Dispatch

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

SOMA Rush Vs. FELT Dispatch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-09 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
SOMA Rush Vs. FELT Dispatch

hey, any thoughts here? I currently have the rush, and really don't have any complaints, but a buddy of mine was preaching the wonder of Felts, and is a fan of aluminum frames. Seems like they're very similar bikes, with the Felt having more relaxed geometry? and an unnecessary frame mounted bottle opener. Does it just boil down to a steel vs. aluminum frame preference?

https://www.feltracing.com/09-catalog...-dispatch.aspx
https://www.somafab.com/rush.html

thanks.
darthfleckner is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 10:32 AM
  #2  
the_don's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 2
From: Tokyo
if you go Felt, get the TK3! It is a much nicer bike. (well, in my eyes at least).
the_don is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Hmmmmm.....Tange prestige tubing or felt 7005 aluminum.

I'd take the soma any day of the week. I also really prefer steel on the street, which is where I ride.
seedubs1 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 11:00 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
TK3 does not have brakes, so you might consider that when comparing costs. I personally like the TK2 better, but it comes at a price.

I have a curbside which is the same as the dispatch except bars and color. I like it a lot but not everyone is a fan of that geometry. My MTB has a horizontal TT and my road bike doesn't.

It all comes down to personal preference and how much you want to spend. Ride both and see which one gives you the biggest thrill.
JackD is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
lukewall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: 2000 Raleigh M50. 2006 Raleigh Rush Hour. 2008 Cannondale Synapse 6.

Originally Posted by the_don
if you go Felt, get the TK3! It is a much nicer bike. (well, in my eyes at least).
They're 2 different frames for different applications. The TK3 isn't much nicer if you want to use a rack and wider tires on your bike.
lukewall is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 11:23 AM
  #6  
mihlbach's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 145
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by darthfleckner
Does it just boil down to a steel vs. aluminum frame preference?

thanks.
Despite the widespread belief that material is all that matters, its really only a minor factor in how a bike rides. As a material, steel is actually both stronger and stiffer than aluminum. However, some aluminum frames tend to give a jarring ride because of the large diameter tubing used to compensate for the lesser stiffness of aluminum. But that does not mean that all ALU frames are stiffer than all steel frames. OUt of all my bikes, the stiffest (EAI Bareknuckle) and unstiffest (Surly Long Haul Trucker) of my bikes are both made of steel. My aluminum bikes are both in the middle somewhere in terms of stiffness. A frame designer can achieve a wide range of ride characteristics with either material by altering the geometry, tube thickness, tube diameter, etc.


Both of those frames are nice frames and are probably going to be stiffer and quicker handling than your average road bike. I would bet that they look more different than how they ride.
mihlbach is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 12:18 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
The Soma for me all day long, but your mileage may differ. Why not ride the Felt and report back here what you think?
palladio is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 12:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
People here love to hate Felt. In the real world I have fun and get many compliments on my terrible green bike.
JackD is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 01:15 PM
  #9  
Goathead magnet
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Don't be a lemming. It's not getting what you want, it's wanting what you got. - SC

palu is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 04:12 PM
  #10  
lockedcog.com
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento

Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 08, Trek 1500 06, Felt tk2 06

im very happy with my felt. its a 06 tk2 so its a 09 tk3
murdaki11 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 07:18 PM
  #11  
'09 FELT Curbside
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, VA

Bikes: 2009 FELT Curbside

I love my Curbside and the wife loves her Dispatch.
SUPER STEVE is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 08:47 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
I've ridden a Soma Rush for the past 4 years, and the only thing it's got going for it is great geometry. It is a cheap frame and it flexes a lot, not stiff by any stretch of the imagination. Mine is made from Reynolds 631.

It has held up well, about 35,000 miles of not so gentle city riding.
Strick is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-09 | 10:54 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I have a Soma Rush Tange and a Felt F55 Alum/Carbon road bike (not sure how it compares to a TK1,2,3).

The Rush geometry is a great fit for me, it is stiff and very well made in my opinion. The drop outs are thick and the bottom bracket sits pretty high which is good for road use. The paint is thick but chips off in big pieces from high wear areas like the drop outs and seat post clamp areas. Mine has the stickers under the clearcoat which sucks if you're going for the low key factor.

The F55 is light and also fits me great, although not a comfortable as the Rush (I do ride this bike 3-4 times the distance than the Rush which could be the reason why). It's light and very fast but a little jumpy on harsh roads and not as stiff on steep climbs.

I'd say if you ride on flats, smooth roads or the track, get the Felt. If you ride on rough roads, paved trails, long distances get the Rush. Both are good bikes, cant really go wrong.
JesusChrysler is offline  
Reply
Old 05-14-09 | 01:31 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
rad. thanks for all the good advice, I really appreciate it. I probably do need to get more acquainted with an aluminum frame before I could make a decision, as I've always only rode steel frames to date. I've been thinking my frame is a little small, and since I might be getting a larger one I though I'd explore a completely different type while I'm switching things up. I'll have to cruise by the old LBS and see if they don't mind getting one in I could check out.

"It all comes down to personal preference and how much you want to spend. Ride both and see which one gives you the biggest thrill."

"I would bet that they look more different than how they ride."

-I think you guys probably hit the nail on the head here, prob 6 of 1 half a dozen of the other!

Thanks again all for the help.
darthfleckner is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.