![]() |
Single fixed vs flip flop—strength
Is there a strength difference with a dished single sided wheel over a non-dished flip-flop?
|
Yes. Dished wheels have assymetrical spoke tension, are laterally more unstable, and spoke failure due to fatigue is much more likely. A well-built dished wheel is still plenty strong and durable, however you can get away with fewer spokes and/or a poorer quality build on a symmetrical wheel because it is an inherently more stable structure.
|
Originally Posted by mihlbach
(Post 9172059)
Yes. Dished wheels have assymetrical spoke tension, are laterally more unstable, and spoke failure due to fatigue is much more likely. A well-built dished wheel is still plenty strong and durable, however you can get away with fewer spokes and/or a poorer quality build on a symmetrical wheel because it is an inherently more stable structure.
|
Game over.
Play again? |
Reset.
|
except 120mm one-sided fixed wheels are not dished. SS conversion (ie: formerly geared) 126/130mm wheels, sure.
|
The real question is: will I die if I ride an dished freewheel converted to single speed versus an undished wheel with a flip-flop hub?
Depends upon the quality of the wheel build and that goes for both wheels. Geared riders put in many millions of miles a year on dished wheels and very few die; even fewer due to rear wheel failure caused by the dished spokes. An undished wheel is stronger but the dished wheel could be stronger than you'll ever need if done right. |
Originally Posted by bbattle
(Post 9174161)
The real question is: will I die if I ride...
|
Originally Posted by dookie
(Post 9174115)
except 120mm one-sided fixed wheels are not dished.
|
Originally Posted by dookie
(Post 9174115)
except 120mm one-sided fixed wheels are not dished. SS conversion (ie: formerly geared) 126/130mm wheels, sure.
|
Originally Posted by LoRoK
(Post 9180176)
My single sided 120mm track hub wheel is certainly dished, unless I'm totally dumb-town.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by mihlbach
(Post 9180520)
Severe dishing is a requirement on geared bikes, but not required on a ss or fg, regardless of whether or not it is single-sided or a flip-flop. Its possible that your wheel was dished slightly to line the cog up with the chainring. What crank, chainring, and BB are you using? A slight amount of dish, done to correct the chainline, is really nothing to worry about.
Sorry the picture uploaded sideways for some reason. |
I could be wrong, but from the looks of that wheel, what you seem to have is a rear wheel built for multigear use that has a single speed freewheel on it instead.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub. |
Originally Posted by droobieinop
(Post 9184272)
I could be wrong, but from the looks of that wheel, what you seem to have is a rear wheel built for multigear use that has a single speed freewheel on it instead.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub. |
Originally Posted by LoRoK
(Post 9184134)
I don't see how you could have a one sided hub and not have some dish. Not extreme like a roadbike, of course, but how would you keep the wheel centered in the frame without some dishing when the drive side of the hub shell doesn't extend as far as the non-drive side to accommodate threading for the cog?
Sorry the picture uploaded sideways for some reason. |
Edit: I see what they did there, there's a little bump on the non drive side that is about the same size as the drive side's threads.
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there? |
Perhaps, and I'm taking a stab in the dark here (and mostly thinking geared) but, balance and easier maintenance.
Wouldn't a frame have to be wider on the drive side to accomidate gears on a symmetrical hub? Unless its an IGH? Which could be difficult to maintain? I realize I might be reaching, I'm just thinking about possible evolutionary development. |
Originally Posted by LoRoK
(Post 9184708)
Edit: I see what they did there, there's a little bump on the non drive side that is about the same size as the drive side's threads.
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.