Single fixed vs flip flop—strength
#2
Yes. Dished wheels have assymetrical spoke tension, are laterally more unstable, and spoke failure due to fatigue is much more likely. A well-built dished wheel is still plenty strong and durable, however you can get away with fewer spokes and/or a poorer quality build on a symmetrical wheel because it is an inherently more stable structure.
#3
Yes. Dished wheels have assymetrical spoke tension, are laterally more unstable, and spoke failure due to fatigue is much more likely. A well-built dished wheel is still plenty strong and durable, however you can get away with fewer spokes and/or a poorer quality build on a symmetrical wheel because it is an inherently more stable structure.
#7
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
The real question is: will I die if I ride an dished freewheel converted to single speed versus an undished wheel with a flip-flop hub?
Depends upon the quality of the wheel build and that goes for both wheels. Geared riders put in many millions of miles a year on dished wheels and very few die; even fewer due to rear wheel failure caused by the dished spokes.
An undished wheel is stronger but the dished wheel could be stronger than you'll ever need if done right.
Depends upon the quality of the wheel build and that goes for both wheels. Geared riders put in many millions of miles a year on dished wheels and very few die; even fewer due to rear wheel failure caused by the dished spokes.
An undished wheel is stronger but the dished wheel could be stronger than you'll ever need if done right.
#10
Thread Starter
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
#11
Severe dishing is a requirement on geared bikes, but not required on a ss or fg, regardless of whether or not it is single-sided or a flip-flop. Its possible that your wheel was dished slightly to line the cog up with the chainring. What crank, chainring, and BB are you using? A slight amount of dish, done to correct the chainline, is really nothing to worry about.
#12
Thread Starter
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
Severe dishing is a requirement on geared bikes, but not required on a ss or fg, regardless of whether or not it is single-sided or a flip-flop. Its possible that your wheel was dished slightly to line the cog up with the chainring. What crank, chainring, and BB are you using? A slight amount of dish, done to correct the chainline, is really nothing to worry about.
Sorry the picture uploaded sideways for some reason.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: Orange Park, Florida
Bikes: jamis xenith comp '08, trek 750 hybrid (w/drops) c.1995, centurian fixie, kona cindercone mtb c.2000
I could be wrong, but from the looks of that wheel, what you seem to have is a rear wheel built for multigear use that has a single speed freewheel on it instead.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub.
#14
Thread Starter
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
I could be wrong, but from the looks of that wheel, what you seem to have is a rear wheel built for multigear use that has a single speed freewheel on it instead.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub.
However, it is potentially possible that a wheel could be relaced with equal length spokes and shifting of axle spacers could center the rim on the hub.
#15
I don't see how you could have a one sided hub and not have some dish. Not extreme like a roadbike, of course, but how would you keep the wheel centered in the frame without some dishing when the drive side of the hub shell doesn't extend as far as the non-drive side to accommodate threading for the cog?
Sorry the picture uploaded sideways for some reason.
Sorry the picture uploaded sideways for some reason.
#16
Thread Starter
a.k.a. QUADZILLA
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Bikes: Super Pista, Basso, Big Dummy
Edit: I see what they did there, there's a little bump on the non drive side that is about the same size as the drive side's threads.
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there?
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there?
Last edited by LoRoK; 06-28-09 at 09:33 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: Orange Park, Florida
Bikes: jamis xenith comp '08, trek 750 hybrid (w/drops) c.1995, centurian fixie, kona cindercone mtb c.2000
Perhaps, and I'm taking a stab in the dark here (and mostly thinking geared) but, balance and easier maintenance.
Wouldn't a frame have to be wider on the drive side to accomidate gears on a symmetrical hub? Unless its an IGH? Which could be difficult to maintain?
I realize I might be reaching, I'm just thinking about possible evolutionary development.
Wouldn't a frame have to be wider on the drive side to accomidate gears on a symmetrical hub? Unless its an IGH? Which could be difficult to maintain?
I realize I might be reaching, I'm just thinking about possible evolutionary development.
#18
Edit: I see what they did there, there's a little bump on the non drive side that is about the same size as the drive side's threads.
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there?
Edit #2: So, while a Dura-ace hub is built to be symmetrical even though it's one sided, my Phil hub isn't. Are there any advantages to an asymmetrical wheel? If a symmetrical wheel is going to suffer less from lateral stress and fatigue, it would make sense that all hubs would be built with symmetry in mind. Since they aren't, I guess there must be some kind of benefit? Is there?




